please remove name . i want to unsubscribe to the list thanks
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Green leslie_gr...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole gallery on egroups
Dwight,
I forwarded that old message from Gregg about the site
he set up for us. No
- Original Message -
From: Mike Vande Bunt mike.vandeb...@mixcom.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole gallery on egroups
TSHACK wrote:
error.jpg.
I can assure you that on this image, I did NOT
Hi all:
Just to let you know that my web site is now open (even if some sections
are still under construction) and it has a nice pinhole section.
I beg you not to be too harsh on me since the site needs some
streamlining. I beleive that the Javascript may not work on earlier
versions of the
I find that when using any ortho film (Kodak, Konica or Arista) that its
ISO in Hi Con developer is 6 But I get a speed increase when I develop
in paper or film developer. Presently I rate my Kodalith at ISO 25 when
using the Clayton developer. If I don't, I tend to have to pull the film
early
Great information about Ortho and Litho film thanks.
not that this completely relates to the conversation strain BUT: here is some
info on this type of film.
I use something from www.freestylesalesco.com called ortho litho film - they
make a sheet that is already cut to a 3.9x4.9 size for 4x5
Ortho means orthochromatic while litho means lithographic. In general,
ortho and litho are different, with ortho just meaning a film not sensitive
to red while litho is a very high contrast film, usually requiring a
special developer. Kodalith Ortho was both ortho and litho,
I have used this film in the past when found at surplus stores. There is
mention of it in my Compact Photo Lab Index from 1979. It has an ISO of
50 under tungsten light. It is able to record intermediate tones like
handwriting or the lines of an etching. Their recommendations for
developing are
I am not an expert on litho/ortho films but I think the ortho film is either
the same as or has similar properties as litho film. Kodak has an 800 number
for customer questions. If you plan not to return it, why not test it as if
it was litho film.
Rusty
In a message dated 8/23/00 8:21:54 PM
Just curious, anyone ever try using Kodak Ektachrome Radiance paper for
direct imaging? (instead of neg to print) The paper is used for prints from
slides, so I am guessing it may work for direct images. Requires R-3 or
R-3000 chemistry, which I know nothing about. Anyone try this or have any
Thank you all for responding to my question regarding
reciprocity law failure on ILFORD HP5 Plus sheet film.
Along with a lot of patience - I will go ahead to check things out.
Erich
-Original Message-
From: Leslie Green [mailto:leslie_gr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 10:54 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Pinhole gallery on egroups
Dwight,
I forwarded that old message from Gregg about the site
he set up
TSHACK wrote:
error.jpg.
I can assure you that on this image, I did NOT have the darkslide out for
three different exposures. When I was through exposing, I would put my
finger over the hole, push the darkslide in, and then take my finger off the
hole. I've got several like this. Can't
Dwight,
I forwarded that old message from Gregg about the site
he set up for us. No offense, just wanted you to know
of its existance. I started to look at your images
and have only looked at a couple yet. Do you live in
Ireland? The first one, Tralee, wasn't saturated in
green; was there a
Here is a math equation that fit the data for this HP5 film given by
Ilford:
Corrected exp = ( 0.10 * X * X ) + ( 2.22143 * X ) - 2.08333
X is the measured exposure in seconds
for instance, to find the corrected exposure for 120 seconds (2 minutes):
Corrected exposure = ( 0.10333 * 120 *
I don't know what it is that makes this list so collaborative,
understanding and tolerant, but I'd be more interested in keeping it like
this than in finding the reason.
It's difficult to get too worked up over things because pinholers all look for
different results. That being the case, it's
Does anyone use ILFORD HP5 Plus sheet film for pinhole photography?
If yes, I need advice.
The manufacturer has supplied my with a reciprocity failure chart
that end with 35 seconds metered time, transforming into 200 seconds
actual exposure time. On my last shooting meter reading was 2
In Steve Simmons' "Using the View Camera" he gives the following reciprocity
info for Ilford films (with the caveat that while these figures work for
him, you may wish to experiment to get the best results for yourself).:
(All times in seconds)
Metered Time
2 4 8
12 16
24 32
45 60
90 120
Hi,
Does anyone use ILFORD HP5 Plus sheet film for pinhole photography?
If yes, I need advice.
The manufacturer has supplied my with a reciprocity failure chart
that end with 35 seconds metered time, transforming into 200 seconds
actual exposure time. On my last shooting meter reading was 2
I don't know what it is that makes this list so collaborative,
understanding and tolerant, but I'd be more interested in keeping it like
this than in finding the reason.
Probably because we're already used to not being able to see what we're
shooting at, and don't get upset when things come
OK, I've loaded a few of my pinhole shots up on the
http://www.egroups.com/group/pinholegallery site.
Looking at them up there now, they don't really look any more out of the
ordinary than any other travelogue photos. I do love a pinhole sky
though. All that foreshortening, and everything tries
21 matches
Mail list logo
