Re: [pkg-go] Call for review: golang-github-urfave-cli

It will be migrated when we do the bulk migration. Until then, if you want to do the less work possible, I think that what Michael has said is fine:  - Create new repositories on salsa  - Don't migrate anything, unless you update the rewritemap, setup the right branch permissions and hooks

Re: [pkg-go] Call for review: golang-github-urfave-cli

Done. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Arnaud wrote: > > > >> >> For the repository we're talking about right now, I understand there's no >> need to bump the version right now, as long as I'm not sure it's needed. >> >> Should I just delete it, or at least take

Re: [pkg-go] Call for review: golang-github-urfave-cli

>   > > > For the repository we're talking about right now, I understand > there's no need to bump the version right now, as long as I'm not > sure it's needed. > > Should I just delete it, or at least take it out of the go > packages group, and keep it as a personal repo ? >

Re: [pkg-go] Call for review: golang-github-urfave-cli

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Arnaud wrote: > > > On 02/20/2018 12:08 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Are you certain that this commit is actually a requirement, or just > happens to be the latest version the containerd people tried? > > > It's just the

Re: [pkg-go] Call for review: golang-github-urfave-cli

On 02/20/2018 12:08 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Are you certain that this commit is actually a requirement, or just > happens to be the latest version the containerd people tried? It's just the version that is vendored by containerd. I assumed they used it for a good reason, that's all.

[pkg-go] Call for review: golang-github-urfave-cli

Dear Debian Go Packaging Team, The latest version of containerd requires a recent snapshot of github.com/urfave/cli. This can be seen with a command such as:       wget --quiet \     https://raw.githubusercontent.com/containerd/containerd/master/vendor.conf \     -O - | \     grep urfave At the