[pkg-go] Bug#848316: Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-20 Thread Dmitry Smirnov 
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 10:41:23 AM AEDT TFAUCK wrote:
> Initially I thought that maintainers of etcd 2.0 which are also
> maintainers for packages relative to go were going to do it, but I may
> be wrong there.

I'm not sure what are you trying to say...
Maintainers (upstream developers) of Etcd are not maintainers of Debian 
package...


> I can work with the package upgrade and submit the debdiff if that's the
> idea ?

Whatever you can do to help is welcome. I suggest to start working on 
dependency packages -- that's where usual >90% of effort will be spent...

-- 
Best wishes,
 Dmitry Smirnov.

---

To predict the behavior of ordinary people in advance, you only have to
assume that they will always try to escape a disagreeable situation with
the smallest possible expenditure of intelligence.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#848316: Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-19 Thread TFAUCK 
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:54:30 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov 
wrote:
> On Friday, 13 January 2017 1:57:33 PM AEDT TFAUCK wrote:
> > So what do we do for that issue ?
> 
> Hopefully fix it eventually by updating "etcd" package...
> 
> 
> > who's going to decide if there is a
> > need for new package or just and upgrade ?
> 
> That would be me... :)
> The matter is quite simple: if my understanding is correct, upstream no 
> longer support Etcd v2... The question is only who is going to update the 
> package and when.
> 
> Why do you think we need two packages and who is going to maintain 'em?
> 
> -- 
> All the best,
>  Dmitry Smirnov.

Hello,
I have checked and definitely etcd 2 package is no longer supported.
Migration to etcd 3 (and even etcd 3.1) is what must be done.
As making the package upgrade and supporting it, I am not too sure -
Initially I thought that maintainers of etcd 2.0 which are also
maintainers for packages relative to go were going to do it, but I may
be wrong there.
I can work with the package upgrade and submit the debdiff if that's the
idea ?

Thanks
Regards
Thierry

-- 

__
thf - Thierry Fauck - tfa...@free.fr>
/pubkey: 4096R/FCC181CE/
/fingerprint: 5CCF 6B82 DE4E E72A A40B B63E A153 BF4F FCC1 81CE/

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#848316: Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-13 Thread Dmitry Smirnov 
On Friday, 13 January 2017 1:57:33 PM AEDT TFAUCK wrote:
> So what do we do for that issue ?

Hopefully fix it eventually by updating "etcd" package...


> who's going to decide if there is a
> need for new package or just and upgrade ?

That would be me... :)
The matter is quite simple: if my understanding is correct, upstream no 
longer support Etcd v2... The question is only who is going to update the 
package and when.

Why do you think we need two packages and who is going to maintain 'em?

-- 
All the best,
 Dmitry Smirnov.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#848316: Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-13 Thread TFAUCK 
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:50:53 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 12:03:44 AM AEDT Potter, Tim wrote:
> > Hi there.  I've currently got someone working on a etcd3 package - still
> > tossing up whether to create a new binary package and keep etcd as
> > implicitly version 2 only.  That's what I'm leaning to at the moment.
> 
> I think we should just upgrade etcd v2 --> v3 without making any new 
> packages.
> 
> -- 
> All the best,
>  Dmitry Smirnov.
> 
> ---
> 
> The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary; men alone
> are quite capable of every wickedness.
> -- Joseph Conrad
So what do we do for that issue ? who's going to decide if there is a
need for new package or just and upgrade ?

All the best
Thierry
-- 

__
thf - Thierry Fauck - tfa...@free.fr>
/pubkey: 4096R/FCC181CE/
/fingerprint: 5CCF 6B82 DE4E E72A A40B B63E A153 BF4F FCC1 81CE/

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#848316: Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-05 Thread Dmitry Smirnov 
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 12:03:44 AM AEDT Potter, Tim wrote:
> Hi there.  I've currently got someone working on a etcd3 package - still
> tossing up whether to create a new binary package and keep etcd as
> implicitly version 2 only.  That's what I'm leaning to at the moment.

I think we should just upgrade etcd v2 --> v3 without making any new 
packages.

-- 
All the best,
 Dmitry Smirnov.

---

The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary; men alone
are quite capable of every wickedness.
-- Joseph Conrad


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#848316: Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-03 Thread Potter, Tim 
On 16 Dec 2016, at 8:04 PM, debian  wrote:
> 
> Source: etcd
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> On https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/etcd I saw that a  new upstream version is 
> available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

Hi there.  I've currently got someone working on a etcd3 package - still 
tossing up whether to create a new
binary package and keep etcd as implicitly version 2 only.  That's what I'm 
leaning to at the moment.

Will close out this bug when there is a new upload!


Thanks,

Tim.

> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: stretch/sid
>  APT prefers unstable
>  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: ppc64el (ppc64le)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-powerpc64le (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
> UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers