Re: RFS: sfcgal/1.1.0
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I have just uploaded a new Version of sfcgal to mentors.debian.net. This is a very minor change. I included a patch from upstream which will make it compile again using boost boost 1.58 and gcc5 * Package name: sfcgal Version : 1.1.0-3 Upstream Author : Mickael Borne (IGN), Hugo Mercier (Oslandia), Vincent Mora (Oslandia), Olivier Courtin (Oslandia) * URL : http://www.sfcgal.org/ * License : LGPL-2+ Section : science Sources have already been uploaded to alioth and are availabe via the following URL: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git Regards Sven -- Exploits and holes are a now a necessary protection against large corporate interests. (Alan Cox) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#796990: Ogr2ogr with wrapdateline fails on armhf
This function uses GEOS, so we should check again after rebuilding that:
See ogrgeometryfactory.cpp:
2321 if (oEnvelope.MinX dfLeftBorderX oEnvelope.MaxX 180)
2322 {
2323 #ifndef HAVE_GEOS
2324 CPLError( CE_Failure, CPLE_NotSupported,
2325 GEOS support not enabled. );
2326 #else
2327 bWrapDateline = TRUE;
2328 #endif
2329 }
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#796990: Ogr2ogr with wrapdateline fails on armhf
On 26-08-15 21:15, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: This function uses GEOS, so we should check again after rebuilding that: Thanks for digging futher! This is all the more reason to start the geos transition soon as mentioned in the bugreport (#791045). Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[sfcgal] branch master updated (eff4eea - bd75537)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic pushed a change to branch master in repository sfcgal. from eff4eea make package build again in unstable using boost 1.58 and gcc5 new 9173dcf Update symbols for other architectures. new bd75537 Set distribution back to UNRELEASED. The 2 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog | 6 +- debian/libsfcgal1.symbols | 250 ++ 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[sfcgal] 02/02: Set distribution back to UNRELEASED.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic pushed a commit to branch master in repository sfcgal. commit bd755374892efda4532507ec9ad8b3376fef42e4 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Wed Aug 26 21:08:03 2015 +0200 Set distribution back to UNRELEASED. --- debian/changelog | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index fca6845..52749ec 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -sfcgal (1.1.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium +sfcgal (1.1.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium [ Sven Geggus ] * Make package build in unstable with boost 1.58 and gcc5 -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#796990: Ogr2ogr with wrapdateline fails on armhf
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I'm not sure what to do with this bugreport, if it's a problem with gdal
on arm{el,hf} we should forward it upstream, but since it can also very
likely be caused by the ongoing transitions we should probably keep it
around for now and check it again when the GCC 5 transitions have completed.
This is not an upstream issue. I checked and ubuntu utopic does not
show this behaviour (with gdal 1.11.2 and before the libstdc++
migration).
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
rasterio_0.25.0-1_armhf.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:34:03 +0200 Source: rasterio Binary: python-rasterio rasterio Architecture: armhf Version: 0.25.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Johan Van de Wauw johan.vandew...@gmail.com Description: python-rasterio - Python API for using geospatial raster data with Numpy rasterio - Command line tool for investigating geospatial rasters Closes: 790549 Changes: rasterio (0.25.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fix tests on i386 (Closes: #790549) * Imported Upstream version 0.25.0 * Fix patches, drop patches included upstream * Skip failing tests during build * Update copyright with AUTHORS.txt Checksums-Sha1: e9e1ef785a282ee2464acd36bc83ce696a55c9ee 445384 python-rasterio_0.25.0-1_armhf.deb Checksums-Sha256: 0a5f6e82993185929d73d623fbc10caab24c0f7ad831570d9dcece19825f5735 445384 python-rasterio_0.25.0-1_armhf.deb Files: ffb8d00fb84f959681d7a4d9395c5bad 445384 python optional python-rasterio_0.25.0-1_armhf.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV3gFNAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrxmQUQAKZLM6CtDReqN15C/3xL1UQe CHxzD52rQBqXE6MbAYpkgGqlfSwBMMsmd9oDRrkAA8STEEJu+1EIWWKq8+ErYnbf t8UzOwYU+MPClIUvQeyIVfsrXlafcibHlRe6GmnGdG5+NCm2u6IWDLztEQ8tyhSF 4MOVDPT/Z4EHgR8h7vbbnFFSgFJTVzfyMzpQ/DOjRW9Wpf+gRIijWpOayXfqzmXj +NFYtZjmJZ12CsWvu5vvPgXR7uJhIPuCgY2GpCoW7AiqpkLzNZ884U3OHV7v/jto qHM6/RjMtbNSiKDP6y9GEwXbR+K9+2QYG+3n+0MQ+YXEHLppGDIUQ2n28WtIuoEt VwJXqOL3hJezz+ulTi94AszpxBLoeclaDvRN3JhT4vvIMbvch5zLHdhNL1niuTSa HsLm5x9Z09LrzsKTVh4fDwZDHO+VP0OWXdS6phCe65UHWtzLcfD5JJ9V//1tx3Ky ETxdKOMHQJjNtaNJkVxJcYSe5ai/8tiYUxxgHfO1yktB1jxBGlUKhqYaFHTQXPwf CRKpxyIFIrSZuBVViqUXT4Gehv6CkNcXzGkJjxa6uz96RGJIQHVNGXaLpzjddSG8 4TIGwfx+444nAR0kLXhhXkb7vnxueqUonsHHW68WN5WwR+DgxvmXQ3qDnZ7sPW8q hcxgG7EMXVlO83j5lOjh =5K5x -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[sfcgal] 01/01: close bug 794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
giggls-guest pushed a commit to branch master
in repository sfcgal.
commit cf8c91c831099c58d22643e5e51ab2c7a490bc53
Author: Sven Geggus sven-...@geggus.net
Date: Wed Aug 26 22:12:38 2015 +0200
close bug 794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign
---
debian/changelog | 1 +
debian/control | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 52749ec..7371ba8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ sfcgal (1.1.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
[ Sven Geggus ]
* Make package build in unstable with boost 1.58 and gcc5
+ * close bug #794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign
[ Bas Couwenberg ]
* Update symbols for other architectures.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index bd0c758..8f53ce0 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Description: Library for ISO 19107:2013 and OGC SFA 1.2 for
3D operations (runti
Package: libsfcgal-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
-Multi-Arch: same
+Multi-Arch: foreign
Depends: libsfcgal1 (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}
Description: Library for ISO 19107:2013 and OGC SFA 1.2 for 3D operations (dev
part)
SFCGAL is a C++ wrapper library around CGAL with the aim of
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[sfcgal] branch master updated (bd75537 - cf8c91c)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. giggls-guest pushed a change to branch master in repository sfcgal. from bd75537 Set distribution back to UNRELEASED. new cf8c91c close bug 794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog | 1 + debian/control | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [sfcgal] 01/01: close bug 794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign
On 26-08-15 22:13, Sven Geggus wrote: + * close bug #794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign Thanks for this change. The changelog entry needs a little tweaking to automatically close the bug on upload as documented in the Policy: If this upload resolves bugs recorded in the Bug Tracking System (BTS), they may be automatically closed on the inclusion of this package into the Debian archive by including the string: closes: Bug#n in the change details.[17] This information is conveyed via the Closes field in the .changes file (see Closes, Section 5.6.22). https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-dpkgchangelog A typical changelog entry that closes a bug looks this: * Change -dev package from M-A: same to foreign. (closes: #794317) The closes: #nn can also be on the same line if its under 74 characters. I haven't seen the symbols change for GCC 5 yet, is the symbols handling using pkg-kde-tools clear enough for you how to handle this? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
rasterio_0.25.0-1_armel.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:34:03 +0200 Source: rasterio Binary: python-rasterio rasterio Architecture: armel Version: 0.25.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Johan Van de Wauw johan.vandew...@gmail.com Description: python-rasterio - Python API for using geospatial raster data with Numpy rasterio - Command line tool for investigating geospatial rasters Closes: 790549 Changes: rasterio (0.25.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fix tests on i386 (Closes: #790549) * Imported Upstream version 0.25.0 * Fix patches, drop patches included upstream * Skip failing tests during build * Update copyright with AUTHORS.txt Checksums-Sha1: 92aad3b3f6acf028c1a0c200e4c6a09ae4395d3a 436372 python-rasterio_0.25.0-1_armel.deb Checksums-Sha256: 1f10cfdb4724ae4b493c94952db7f4a95b342760dfe6ebef6cd8c0d377ee6a02 436372 python-rasterio_0.25.0-1_armel.deb Files: 87e5dbb525c6c420a87eae4e476cd5d9 436372 python optional python-rasterio_0.25.0-1_armel.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV3e8dAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrxg5AP/jBdY1bYxWezfXEt0Wfb8Ces Or0UZQ6bn5re+3dZ2BlPX6mrC8wflT8yk13hQYXrja1m5UuaE4wrdAy5IMpcU2IE X7erDy519ujP/D7GQG6s95FyIt/v+BZWjQpRHWFBPfmq7c6138RUDqLGp2d7n2HD Vu2lRSywWewZEV/0JbzI0x1Hl46K2RgW5ecIQhAuqV+fdSiiNbg3MOll61bxfvs4 WjIbxQikrdk8iDDV7ZXiPyGh1CwVarSym2x1ZQydbczA5RsnpojDAOj8nGVrukY/ K7f7ANYCDqH1K1lLJmQCYJiVJbZhVJOJuineMyqYQnv23CbbaCyjZonIorSWZRGv hgUa7Ye5kHmDgvTGiZvBIwNrB7GEMB6brQSpWXB5WHHbFLRg6Txzf8+uuI9R+M9K n2wiHXRPhtLWuNIf1QmqR7EXS1UoOplU0KrWyi5pMKohJInNtCR0f27o6qPoL/Jc j+/bFDQahk3K8av+MASsLiw4HycWhQgGte25M36ZDDmMv49I2G+qIButOI7FZS81 SZ4/qELjPTqWZMkzcoS6O3NAfsgZqH0QkuTRbQX6XmDzbGdBzECj1F8wR749QmIa UaSC4yYmpdnD4I53/bxzc/B071RuZUWl1OaXoCsdslXw3+7SuiWEfB6nt25JtwEP 8Cv/UX8VbWNoiq/AbuNT =aB6i -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#796990: Ogr2ogr with wrapdateline fails on armhf
Package:gdal Version: 1.11.2+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Hello Team members, While investigating the failing tests of rasterio in sid on armhf/armel [1,2] I tried doing the same command using ogr2ogr: ogr2ogr new.geojson test.geojson -t_srs epsg:4326 -f GeoJSON -wrapdateline ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert The same error is encountered. This error comes from C++ so I assume it is related to the libstdc++ transition. Moreover, if I build rasterio on stretch the error does not occur (and the ogr2ogr command works fine). [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rasterioarch=armelver=0.25.0-1stamp=1440369003 [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rasterioarch=armhfver=0.25.0-1stamp=1440368428 test.geojson Description: Binary data ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#796990: Ogr2ogr with wrapdateline fails on armhf
On 26-08-15 18:02, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
While investigating the failing tests of rasterio in sid on
armhf/armel [1,2] I tried doing the same command using ogr2ogr:
ogr2ogr new.geojson test.geojson -t_srs epsg:4326 -f GeoJSON -wrapdateline
ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert
ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert
ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert
ERROR 1: vector::_M_fill_insert
The same error is encountered. This error comes from C++ so I assume
it is related to the libstdc++ transition. Moreover, if I build
rasterio on stretch the error does not occur (and the ogr2ogr command
works fine).
Builds on stretch have different versions in the dependency chain, as
part of the ongoing GCC 5 transitions several packages in the rasterio
dependency chain have been updated to newer upstream versions, most
importantly gdal.
The most interesting aspect of this issue is that it's limited to
arm{hf,el} which makes me suspect architecture differences are the root
cause.
I'm not sure what to do with this bugreport, if it's a problem with gdal
on arm{el,hf} we should forward it upstream, but since it can also very
likely be caused by the ongoing transitions we should probably keep it
around for now and check it again when the GCC 5 transitions have completed.
For now I'll do some porter uploads with nocheck to allow the build to
succeed and not block the gdal transition.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[sfcgal] branch master updated (045ec5f - eff4eea)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. giggls-guest pushed a change to branch master in repository sfcgal. from 045ec5f Set distribution to unstable. new eff4eea make package build again in unstable using boost 1.58 and gcc5 The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog | 6 + ...T_VARIANT_USE_RELAXED_GET_BY_DEFAULT-in-c.patch | 29 ++ debian/patches/series | 1 + 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 debian/patches/0002-define-BOOST_VARIANT_USE_RELAXED_GET_BY_DEFAULT-in-c.patch -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[sfcgal] branch master updated (cf8c91c - 97f37f9)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. giggls-guest pushed a change to branch master in repository sfcgal. from cf8c91c close bug 794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign new 97f37f9 update symbols from amd64 build The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/libsfcgal1.symbols | 1565 +++-- 1 file changed, 1497 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: [sfcgal] 01/01: change closes sytax according to https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-dpkgchangelog
Hi Sven, Hopefully you do get this reply, it looks like Alioth is still configured to use your old email address sven-deb@ instead sven-debian@ you use now. You should probably update your profile on Alioth. On 26-08-15 23:57, Sven Geggus wrote: --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,10 +1,7 @@ sfcgal (1.1.0-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium - [ Sven Geggus ] * Make package build in unstable with boost 1.58 and gcc5 - * close bug #794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign - - [ Bas Couwenberg ] + * closes Bug#794317 by adding Multi-Arch: foreign * Update symbols for other architectures. -- Sven Geggus sven-deb...@geggus.net Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:56:50 +0200 Why did you squash the changes? Just rewriting your second change is sufficient. The point is to not include the closes command in your change description. Hence my suggestion: * Change -dev package from M-A: same to foreign. (closes: #794317) Closing the bug in the changelog is important metadata, but it doesn't describe the change. That's why we commonly append (closes: #nn) after the change description, it shouldn't be the change description itself. You also didn't add foreign, you switched to it. So the wording is currently very misleading. Please read up on the changelog best practices in the Developer Reference: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch06.en.html#bpp-debian-changelog Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
[sfcgal] branch master updated (97f37f9 - 412069b)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. giggls-guest pushed a change to branch master in repository sfcgal. from 97f37f9 update symbols from amd64 build new 412069b change closes sytax according to https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-dpkgchangelog The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as adds were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference. Summary of changes: debian/changelog | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/sfcgal.git ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#791067: hdf5: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 at 12:15:10 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: hdf5 in experimental have a soversion bump. From there I'm unsure about what to do right now. This SONAME bump means the necessary rename has taken place in experimental. What do you plan to do about unstable? There are basically two options: * send the experimental version to unstable, if you believe this to have a low risk of derailing the g++-5 transition, and in particular all the reverse-dependencies still build; * do a v5 rename in unstable, similar to https://patches.ubuntu.com/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.13+docs-15ubuntu2.patch My advice would be to choose whichever of those you think is lower-risk. The release team have said[1] that starting the transition is OK for any library whose library dependencies have all either started *their* transitions, or been confirmed not to need transitions. hdf5 doesn't appear to depend on any C++ libraries except mpich, which doesn't seem to be affected by this whole mess due to having a simpler ABI than most C++ libraries - so I think hdf5 is ready to go? (If you require confirmation from the release team I can try to get that, but I don't think they are going to be able to follow up on each of the dozens of parallel transitions involved in the libstdc++ ABI change, which is why I'm trying to help keep things moving.) Regards, S [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/08/msg00426.html ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#796912: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
qlandkartegt | 1.8.1+ds-1+b1 | armel, armhf
--- Reason ---
ROM; Dependencies not available on arm{el,hf}
--
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.
Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.
Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 796...@bugs.debian.org.
The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/796912
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#779974: josm: invalid certificate (incomplete /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacert)
Hi Salvo Java Team, As reported in the #779974 josm is not working for Salvo because the tile.openstreetmap.org SSL certificates are not trusted. This is caused by the /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacert list being incomplete, it doesn't include the entries other systems with ca-certificates-java have. So far I've been unable to get Salvo to regenerate /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacert properly, as should be automatic by the jks-keystore ca-certificates update hook. Do you have any advise what we could try to get his Java cacerts fixed? We've already tried to import the certificates in the CA chain manually, although that shouldn't be required. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#779974: josm: invalid certificate (incomplete /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacert)
I tried using it today again. I've noticed that after I get the initial error asking me to configure a proxy, if I just hit cancel I can go on working normally. 2015-08-26 12:42 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl: Hi Salvo Java Team, As reported in the #779974 josm is not working for Salvo because the tile.openstreetmap.org SSL certificates are not trusted. This is caused by the /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacert list being incomplete, it doesn't include the entries other systems with ca-certificates-java have. So far I've been unable to get Salvo to regenerate /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacert properly, as should be automatic by the jks-keystore ca-certificates update hook. Do you have any advise what we could try to get his Java cacerts fixed? We've already tried to import the certificates in the CA chain manually, although that shouldn't be required. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#779974: josm: invalid certificate (incomplete /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacert)
On 26-08-15 13:15, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: I tried using it today again. I've noticed that after I get the initial error asking me to configure a proxy, if I just hit cancel I can go on working normally. Shall we just close this bugreport, since a workaround is available? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#791067: hdf5: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Hi Simon, Thanks for helping :) Simon McVittie a écrit le 27/08/2015 00:36 : On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 at 12:15:10 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: hdf5 in experimental have a soversion bump. From there I'm unsure about what to do right now. This SONAME bump means the necessary rename has taken place in experimental. What do you plan to do about unstable? There are basically two options: * send the experimental version to unstable, if you believe this to have a low risk of derailing the g++-5 transition, and in particular all the reverse-dependencies still build; * do a v5 rename in unstable, similar to https://patches.ubuntu.com/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.13+docs-15ubuntu2.patch My advice would be to choose whichever of those you think is lower-risk. IMHO either way is equal in risk. There are 60+ rdepends on hdf5 and I'd very much prefer managing one direct transition to release 1.8.15 than two transitions (to v5 then to 1.8.15). The release team have said[1] that starting the transition is OK for any library whose library dependencies have all either started *their* transitions, or been confirmed not to need transitions. hdf5 doesn't appear to depend on any C++ libraries except mpich, which doesn't seem to be affected by this whole mess due to having a simpler ABI than most C++ libraries - so I think hdf5 is ready to go? The hdf5 c++ lib is not built for any of the MPI variants (because not supported upstream). Then, from what you wrote, I'd said that hdf5 is ready to go. But idealy I guess I'm expected to test the build of every rdepends, which will take some time. (If you require confirmation from the release team I can try to get that, but I don't think they are going to be able to follow up on each of the dozens of parallel transitions involved in the libstdc++ ABI change, which is why I'm trying to help keep things moving.) I just don't understand why this bug was assigned back to src:hdf5. A piece of explanation from vorlon would have been appreciated. Anyway, I'll assign it back to release.d.o when I'll have the rdepends builds checked. Thanks again for your help! _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
