Hello,
The inclusion of libgeotiff (which is included in debian gdal if
I'm not wrong) in fedora extras is blocked by a licencing issue that
may be relevant for debian.
It seems like some data included in libgeotiff is covered by:
http://www.epsg.org/CurrentDB.html#use
with
3. The data ma
Author: frankie
Date: 2006-08-08 12:12:57 + (Tue, 08 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 507
Modified:
packages/gdal/trunk/debian/changelog
packages/gdal/trunk/debian/control
Log:
Preparing release of 1.3.2-2
Modified: packages/gdal/trunk/debian/changelog
==
Author: frankie
Date: 2006-08-08 12:17:54 + (Tue, 08 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 508
Added:
packages/gdal/tags/1.3.2-2/
Log:
Tagging 1.3.2-2
Copied: packages/gdal/tags/1.3.2-2 (from rev 507, packages/gdal/trunk)
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pk
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:45:57PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The inclusion of libgeotiff (which is included in debian gdal if
> I'm not wrong) in fedora extras is blocked by a licencing issue that
> may be relevant for debian.
>
> It seems like some data included in libgeotiff i
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:41:32PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:45:57PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The inclusion of libgeotiff (which is included in debian gdal if
> > I'm not wrong) in fedora extras is blocked by a licencing issue that
Your message dated Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:43:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [DebianGIS-dev] Bug#381955: libgdal1-1.3.2: file conflicts
with libgdal1-1.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Author: frankie
Date: 2006-08-08 16:39:04 + (Tue, 08 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 509
Added:
packages/pkg-grass/debian/grass-dev.dirs
packages/pkg-grass/debian/grass-dev.install
Removed:
packages/pkg-grass/debian/libgrass-dev.dirs
packages/pkg-grass/debian/libgrass-dev.install
packag
7 matches
Mail list logo
