libowasp-esapi-java_2.1.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libowasp-esapi-java_2.1.0-2.dsc
libowasp-esapi-java_2.1.0.orig.tar.bz2
libowasp-esapi-java_2.1.0-2.debian.tar.gz
libowasp-esapi-java_2.1.0-2_all.deb
libowasp-esapi-java-doc_2.1.0-2_all.deb
Hi,
On 22/05/14 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Some js-files are licensed under MIT, GPL or Apache-2. These licenses are
not mentioned in debian/copyright.
Please also remove all minified js-files where no sources are provided.
Right, I understand the problem now, and I'd like some advice,
Hi,
On 22/05/14 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
For example src/test/resources/log4j.dtd is licensed under Apache-2,
which is not mentioned in debian/coypright.
There might be other licenses missing!
Well spotted; I rashly belived upstream's LICENSE-README :-/. I did some
grepping and just
binary:libowasp-esapi-java is NEW.
binary:libowasp-esapi-java-doc is NEW.
source:libowasp-esapi-java is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are
On 30/05/14 10:32, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/05/2014 11:11, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
What would you prefer? i) has the advantages of leaving the source as
upstream have it in their SVN ; ii) is perhaps the right compromise
option; iii) seems too extreme.
IMHO if the minified JavaScript
Le 30/05/2014 11:11, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
What would you prefer? i) has the advantages of leaving the source as
upstream have it in their SVN ; ii) is perhaps the right compromise
option; iii) seems too extreme.
IMHO if the minified JavaScript files are only test objects they should
be
Le 30/05/2014 11:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
It's difficult to determine what license they might be covered by;
AFAICT they are the result of pointing something like wget at a bunch of
sites, namely: cnn.com, deadspin.com, fark.com, google.com,
microsoft.com, slashdot.org
In this case I
On 30/05/14 10:47, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 30/05/2014 11:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
It's difficult to determine what license they might be covered by;
AFAICT they are the result of pointing something like wget at a bunch of
sites, namely: cnn.com, deadspin.com, fark.com, google.com,
commons-beanutils_1.9.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libcommons-beanutils-java_1.9.2-1_all.deb
libcommons-beanutils-java-doc_1.9.2-1_all.deb
commons-beanutils_1.9.2-1.dsc
commons-beanutils_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz
libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3+dfsg-1.dsc
libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2
libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3+dfsg-1_all.deb
binary:libowasp-antisamy-java is NEW.
binary:libowasp-antisamy-java-doc is NEW.
source:libowasp-antisamy-java is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:58:47 +0200
Source: commons-beanutils
Binary: libcommons-beanutils-java libcommons-beanutils-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
FYI: The status of the jssc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.0-2
Current version: 2.6.0-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the groovy source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.8.6-1
Current version: 1.8.6-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the libasm4-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 5.0.1-2
Current version: 5.0.3-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Hi Matthew,
I marked your package for accept now, but please take care of:
W: libowasp-antisamy-java: copyright-refers-to-deprecated-bsd-license-file
Thanks!
Thorsten
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:23:32 +0100
Source: libowasp-antisamy-java
Binary: libowasp-antisamy-java libowasp-antisamy-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
control: reassign -1 libtomcat6-java
Hi,
[...]
BUILD FAILED
/srv/jenkins-slave/workspace/sid-goto-cc-lucene-solr/lucene-solr-3.6.2+dfsg/solr/build.xml:322:
The following error occurred while executing this line:
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 libtomcat6-java
Bug #749364 [lucene-solr] lucene-solr: FTBFS - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/LocalResolver
Bug reassigned from package 'lucene-solr' to 'libtomcat6-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Package: lwjgl
Version: 2.7.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Usertags: goto-cc
During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder
and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
[...]
I: Running /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc ${DEBBUILDOPTS}
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-9_all.deb
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-9.dsc
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-9.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
This
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 12:28:56 +0900
Source: libstruts1.2-java
Binary: libstruts1.2-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.9-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Your message dated Sat, 31 May 2014 04:18:57 +
with message-id e1wqakz-0003ru...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#745897: fixed in libstruts1.2-java 1.2.9-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #745897,
regarding libstruts1.2-java: CVE-2014-0114
to be marked as done.
This means that you
control: tags -1 +unreproducible
Hi,
I've rebuilt eclipse package in current sid using pbuilder and didn't
encounter any error.
Can someone please confirm this bug is still relevant?
me too (cowbuilder amd64/sid), so once tag it as unreproducible.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich
Processing control commands:
tags -1 +unreproducible
Bug #747054 [eclipse] FTBFS: package javax.servlet.http does not exist
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
747054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747054
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
25 matches
Mail list logo
