Bug#649476:

2012-01-03 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
tags 649476 fixed-upstream thanks ... Note that this test pass FOP TRUNK (rev 1183620) successfully. ... __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for

Bug#649476: marked as done (fop: Fails to build publican's user guide with org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException java.lang.NullPointerException)

2012-01-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:02:55 + with message-id e1ri5t9-0005oa...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#649476: fixed in fop 1:1.0.dfsg2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #649476, regarding fop: Fails to build publican's user guide with org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException

Bug#649476: fop: Failure confirmed with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 but not with 1:0.95.dfsg-11

2012-01-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
2011/12/8 Vincent Hobeïka vincent.hobe...@cosmo-platform.org: Hi, On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote: Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead? I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes (revision

Bug#649476:

2012-01-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
tags 649476 - help tags 649476 confirmed thanks I could reproduce the segfault with a tiny test case. See: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28113 Let's hope someone figure out which svn revision needs to be imported in fop 1.0 branch. Thanks __ This is the maintainer

Bug#649476: fop: Failure confirmed with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 but not with 1:0.95.dfsg-11

2011-12-08 Thread Vincent Hobeïka
Hi, On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote: Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead? I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes (revision 1211788). Another user is confirming this on the fop users mailing

Bug#649476: fop: Failure confirmed with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 but not with 1:0.95.dfsg-11

2011-12-07 Thread Vincent Hobeika
Package: fop Severity: normal Dear Raphaël, I have tested your issue with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 and 1:0.95.dfsg-11. I confirm this bug for 1:1.0.dfsg2-3. However on 1:0.95.dfsg-11 I was able to produce the User Guide.pdf without any problem. I have started a thread on fop users mailing list. We are

Bug#649476: fop: Failure confirmed with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 but not with 1:0.95.dfsg-11

2011-12-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011, Vincent Hobeika wrote: I confirm this bug for 1:1.0.dfsg2-3. However on 1:0.95.dfsg-11 I was able to produce the User Guide.pdf without any problem. Yes, the build used to work with the old fop. I have started a thread on fop users mailing list. We are trying to find the

Bug#649476: fop: Fails to build publican's user guide with org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException java.lang.NullPointerException

2011-11-21 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Package: fop Version: 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 Severity: important publican 2.8 (that I just uploaded to unstable) has a test suite and fop is called as part of this test suite since it's the tool used to generate the PDF output. But fop fails with this highly unhelpful error message: Exception