2011/12/8 Vincent Hobeïka vincent.hobe...@cosmo-platform.org:
Hi,
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead?
I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes
(revision
Hi,
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead?
I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes
(revision 1211788).
Another user is confirming this on the fop users mailing
Package: fop
Severity: normal
Dear Raphaël,
I have tested your issue with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 and 1:0.95.dfsg-11.
I confirm this bug for 1:1.0.dfsg2-3. However on 1:0.95.dfsg-11 I was
able to produce the User Guide.pdf without any problem.
I have started a thread on fop users mailing list. We are
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011, Vincent Hobeika wrote:
I confirm this bug for 1:1.0.dfsg2-3. However on 1:0.95.dfsg-11 I was
able to produce the User Guide.pdf without any problem.
Yes, the build used to work with the old fop.
I have started a thread on fop users mailing list. We are trying to
find the
4 matches
Mail list logo
