Bug#566901: Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Vincent, On 17.10.2013 19:12, Vincent Fourmond wrote: [...] > Good job for checking all that ! You're welcome. > >> As you said verifying that everything works as intended is time >> consuming. Therefore I have targeted the new revision for experimental. >> I suggest to ask the maintainers

Bug#566901: Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hi Markus, On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: tags 566901 patch > > Hi Vincent, > > On 17.10.2013 15:07, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > [...] >> I don't have the time to review the patch right now. I can have a >> look this week-end, if you want more eyes, but if yo

Processed: Re: Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 566901 patch Bug #566901 [libbatik-java] Please split out scripts depending on headed JRE Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #566901 to the same tags previously set -- 566901: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566901 725461: http://bugs.debia

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags 566901 patch Hi Vincent, On 17.10.2013 15:07, Vincent Fourmond wrote: [...] > I don't have the time to review the patch right now. I can have a > look this week-end, if you want more eyes, but if you feel confident > about the current state, I don't mind an upload as-is. No worri

Processed: Re: Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 566901 patch Bug #566901 [libbatik-java] Please split out scripts depending on headed JRE Added tag(s) patch. -- 566901: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566901 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-17 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hi, [currently at a congress, hence not very on top of Debian things] On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > The current svn revision still recommends default-jre because of the > included wrapper scripts squiggle, rasterizer, ttf2svg and svgpp. The > recommendation for de

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-16 Thread tony mancill
On 10/16/2013 11:28 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > On 16.10.2013 07:21, tony mancill wrote: >> On 10/14/2013 06:23 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: > [...] >>> I have prepared a new revision for batik and committed everything to the >>> svn repository of the package. I believe the changes will fix

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-16 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, On 16.10.2013 07:21, tony mancill wrote: > On 10/14/2013 06:23 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: [...] >> I have prepared a new revision for batik and committed everything to the >> svn repository of the package. I believe the changes will fix this bug. > > Hi, > > Any concerns with an upload of Ma

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-15 Thread tony mancill
On 10/14/2013 06:23 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 14.10.2013 12:00, Daniel Schepler wrote: > [...] >> The point is, this installs openjdk-6-jdk by preference because it's first in >> the Build-Depends; and the only parts of openjdk-7 that get pulled in by >> other >> packages are -jre-headless a

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-14 Thread Markus Koschany
On 14.10.2013 12:00, Daniel Schepler wrote: [...] > The point is, this installs openjdk-6-jdk by preference because it's first in > the Build-Depends; and the only parts of openjdk-7 that get pulled in by other > packages are -jre-headless and -jre-lib. Indeed. The alternative build-dependency on

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-14 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Monday, October 14, 2013 10:20:25 AM Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: severity 725461 normal > Control: tags 725461 moreinfo > > Hello, > > I have also tried to reproduce your issue but without success. Batik > builds without problems in a clean cowbuilder chroot on sid amd64. > > I'm loweri

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-14 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: severity 725461 normal Control: tags 725461 moreinfo Hello, I have also tried to reproduce your issue but without success. Batik builds without problems in a clean cowbuilder chroot on sid amd64. I'm lowering the severity to normal and tagging the bug "moreinfo" until more information a

Processed: Re: Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 725461 + unreproducible Bug #725461 [src:batik] batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 725461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-06 Thread tony mancill
tag 725461 + unreproducible thanks On 10/05/2013 09:02 PM, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Source: batik > Version: 1.7+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious (snip) > BUILD FAILED > /tmp/buildd/batik-1.7+dfsg/build.xml:1008: Unable to find a javac compiler; > com.sun.tools.javac.Main is not on the classpath. > Perh

Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2013-10-05 Thread Daniel Schepler
Source: batik Version: 1.7+dfsg-3 Severity: serious >From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build test -x debian/rules mkdir -p "." cd . && /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/bin/java -classpath /usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.