Accepted:
buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/b/buddycloud-server/buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1.debian.tar.gz
buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1.dsc
to main/b/buddycloud-server/buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1.dsc
buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1_all.deb
to main/b/buddycloud-server/buddycloud-server
buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1.dsc
buddycloud-server_0.1.11.orig.tar.gz
buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1.debian.tar.gz
buddycloud-server_0.1.11-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (ru
Your message dated Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:17:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620223: fixed in jqapi 1.7+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #620223,
regarding [jquery] please include documentation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Accepted:
jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/j/jqapi/jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.dsc
to main/j/jqapi/jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.dsc
jqapi_1.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
to main/j/jqapi/jqapi_1.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
jquery-alternative-doc_1.7+dfsg-1_all.deb
to main/j/jqapi/jquery-alterna
Accepted:
backbone_0.9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/b/backbone/backbone_0.9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
backbone_0.9.0-1.dsc
to main/b/backbone/backbone_0.9.0-1.dsc
backbone_0.9.0.orig.tar.gz
to main/b/backbone/backbone_0.9.0.orig.tar.gz
libjs-backbone_0.9.0-1_all.deb
to main/b/backbone/libjs-backbon
backbone_0.9.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
backbone_0.9.0-1.dsc
backbone_0.9.0.orig.tar.gz
backbone_0.9.0-1.debian.tar.gz
libjs-backbone_0.9.0-1_all.deb
node-backbone_0.9.0-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on hos
(new) jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz optional doc
(new) jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.dsc optional doc
(new) jqapi_1.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz optional doc
(new) jquery-alternative-doc_1.7+dfsg-1_all.deb optional doc
Alternative jQuery Documentation
JQAPI is inspired by the Rails API. The content is the same as in th
jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.dsc
jqapi_1.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
jqapi_1.7+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
jquery-alternative-doc_1.7+dfsg-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
libjs-underscore_1.3.1-1_all.deb
to main/u/underscore/libjs-underscore_1.3.1-1_all.deb
node-underscore_1.3.1-1_all.deb
to main/u/underscore/node-underscore_1.3.1-1_all.deb
underscore_1.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/u/underscore/underscore_1.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
underscore_1.3.1-1.ds
underscore_1.3.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
underscore_1.3.1-1.dsc
underscore_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
underscore_1.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
libjs-underscore_1.3.1-1_all.deb
node-underscore_1.3.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (ru
On 31/01/12 14:44, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 31/01/2012 15:06, Andrew Baxter wrote:
I was thinking that someone might want to install several nodejs based packages
on their system.
Say one has all its dependencies in debian, and they have all been installed
that way, but the
other hasn't been packa
On 31/01/2012 15:06, Andrew Baxter wrote:
> On 31/01/12 12:51, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> On 31/01/2012 13:40, Andrew Baxter wrote:
>>> OK. If I get the energy, I'll look into how hard it would be to make npm
>>> detect installed debian packages.
>> Considering how npm works,
>> I really don't understan
On 31/01/12 12:51, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 31/01/2012 13:40, Andrew Baxter wrote:
OK. If I get the energy, I'll look into how hard it would be to make npm detect
installed debian packages.
Considering how npm works,
I really don't understand what advantage that would bring.
Could you explain ?
On 12-01-31 at 12:40pm, Andrew Baxter wrote:
> On 31/01/12 12:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >By packaging shared code as shared code, we encourage use of shared
> >code. Among our users, and also among developers of Debian: when you
> >decide to stuff a piece of shareable code into a consuming p
On 31/01/2012 13:40, Andrew Baxter wrote:
> On 31/01/12 12:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On 12-01-31 at 11:46am, Andrew Baxter wrote:
>>> what are the reasons for wanting separate debian packages for each
>>> dependent library of a program like the buddycloud web client? I'm
>>> assuming the idea
On 31/01/12 12:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-01-31 at 11:46am, Andrew Baxter wrote:
what are the reasons for wanting separate debian packages for each
dependent library of a program like the buddycloud web client? I'm
assuming the idea is to reduce code duplication between packages, but
I'd
On 12-01-31 at 11:46am, Andrew Baxter wrote:
> what are the reasons for wanting separate debian packages for each
> dependent library of a program like the buddycloud web client? I'm
> assuming the idea is to reduce code duplication between packages, but
> I'd rather have a definite answer than
On 30/01/12 21:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Andrew (and others following),
On 12-01-30 at 01:13pm, Andrew Baxter wrote:
I'm emailing partly to introduce myself, and partly with a few
questions about the best way to go about packaging programs based on
node.js for debian.
Welcome to the Debia
18 matches
Mail list logo
