On 16/01/2013 12:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting David I. Lehn (2013-01-16 01:12:17)
>> I would also like to see nodejs updated and have been working on it a
>> bit.
>
> We all would like to see Nodejs updated.
>
>
>> I'm kind of amazed that anyone would have to justify upgrading an
>> a
Quoting David I. Lehn (2013-01-16 01:12:17)
> I would also like to see nodejs updated and have been working on it a
> bit.
We all would like to see Nodejs updated.
> I'm kind of amazed that anyone would have to justify upgrading an
> ancient release because obviously it has to been done at som
On 14/01/2013 21:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Rick Waldron (2013-01-14 21:09:42)
>> It's strange to me this is even an issue that's being argued, I would
>> assume that a Debian package maintainer would be responsible enough to
>> keep up with the latest stable releases of whatever they
Quoting Rick Waldron (2013-01-14 21:09:42)
> It's strange to me this is even an issue that's being argued, I would
> assume that a Debian package maintainer would be responsible enough to
> keep up with the latest stable releases of whatever they have taken on
> to maintain.
> Back in the real-w
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:09:42PM -0500, Rick Waldron wrote:
>It's strange to me this is even an issue that's being argued, I would
>assume that a Debian package maintainer would be responsible enough to
>keep up with the latest stable releases of whatever they have taken on to
>ma
On Thursday 03 January 2013 22:55:32 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Personally I find the currently packaged version of Nodejs quite usable,
> so it might help elaborating what more detailed renders is useless for
> you.
On my side, I need nodejs 0.8 to work on Ares project [1], so I've compiled my
Hi Ruben,
Quoting Ruben Herold (2013-01-03 21:27:07)
> The current upstream version of nodejs is 0.8.16, but the version
> currently packaged for Debian is 0.6.19~dfsg1-6. This makes nodejs in
> Debian nearly unuseable
Above seems almost identical to the original bugreport: Please note that