Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
On 11/05/13 17:46, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 23:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. The current status is : * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably better be using it in testing/sid. thanks for the feedback ;) Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. Yes, I will try it. I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of nodejs is feasible? I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy and all seems OK ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 11/05/13 17:46, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 23:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. The current status is : * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably better be using it in testing/sid. thanks for the feedback ;) Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. Yes, I will try it. I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of nodejs is feasible? I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy and all seems OK Do you backport libv8 too ? Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 11/05/13 17:46, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 23:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. The current status is : * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably better be using it in testing/sid. thanks for the feedback ;) Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. Yes, I will try it. I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of nodejs is feasible? I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy and all seems OK Do you backport libv8 too ? Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure wheezy It has a version of libv8 depending on libc = 2.14 - I simply pulled the packages selectively from testing some months ago Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
On 11/10/2013 10:22, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 11/05/13 17:46, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 23:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. The current status is : * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably better be using it in testing/sid. thanks for the feedback ;) Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. Yes, I will try it. I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of nodejs is feasible? I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy and all seems OK Do you backport libv8 too ? Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure wheezy It has a version of libv8 depending on libc = 2.14 - I simply pulled the packages selectively from testing some months ago Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? I didn't but i can't see a reason why it wouldn't work smoothly. Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-10-11 10:22:48) On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of nodejs is feasible? I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy and all seems OK Do you backport libv8 too ? Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure wheezy It has a version of libv8 depending on libc = 2.14 - I simply pulled the packages selectively from testing some months ago Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? I suspect you mean libv8-3.14 - libv8 is same version in stable, testing and unstable. I have not (yet) backported libv8-3.14 to stable, but I have backported nodejs-0.6.19~dfsg1 to stable, and backported uglifyjs, pegjs and jssip to stable infected by that nodejs backport: deb http://debian.jones.dk/ wheezy javascript - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
On 11/10/13 11:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-10-11 10:22:48) On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of nodejs is feasible? I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy and all seems OK Do you backport libv8 too ? Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure wheezy It has a version of libv8 depending on libc = 2.14 - I simply pulled the packages selectively from testing some months ago Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? I suspect you mean libv8-3.14 - libv8 is same version in stable, testing and unstable. I have not (yet) backported libv8-3.14 to stable, but I have backported nodejs-0.6.19~dfsg1 to stable, and backported uglifyjs, pegjs and jssip to stable infected by that nodejs backport: deb http://debian.jones.dk/ wheezy javascript Related to this, I prepared a fix for closure-compiler, one of the jssip build dependencies This should clear FTBFS: jssip and allow simplification of jssip:debian/rules and build-deps http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565#41 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
On 11/10/13 13:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-10-11 13:09:38) On 11/10/13 11:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-10-11 10:22:48) On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of nodejs is feasible? I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy and all seems OK Do you backport libv8 too ? Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure wheezy It has a version of libv8 depending on libc = 2.14 - I simply pulled the packages selectively from testing some months ago Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? I suspect you mean libv8-3.14 - libv8 is same version in stable, testing and unstable. I have not (yet) backported libv8-3.14 to stable, but I have backported nodejs-0.6.19~dfsg1 to stable, and backported uglifyjs, pegjs and jssip to stable infected by that nodejs backport: deb http://debian.jones.dk/ wheezy javascript Related to this, I prepared a fix for closure-compiler, one of the jssip build dependencies This should clear FTBFS: jssip and allow simplification of jssip:debian/rules and build-deps http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565#41 I still (as I believe I pointed out in one of the bugreports I filed that day when doing the backport) recommend using uglifyjs consistently. (upstream argued there was a big size gain using another minifier, but in actual test the difference was minimal, and uglifyjs is (also) well tested and means simpler dependencies, compared to Java-based tools. For some reason (I haven't checked exactly why) upstream uses closure-compiler for their Grammar file and uglify for the rest of their code While it wouldn't be hard, I'm not too keen to make further changes to their build system unless it is essential - however, if you are curious about this particular case, you could raise an issue in their github project page and we can try to understand it ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
Hi Jérémy, On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 23:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. The current status is : * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably better be using it in testing/sid. thanks for the feedback ;) Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. Yes, I will try it. Cheers, -- Marcelo Jorge Vieira xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org http://metaldot.alucinados.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
Hi Jérémy, What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? Cheers, -- Marcelo Jorge Vieira xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org http://metaldot.alucinados.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] backport nodejs to wheezy
On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: Hi Jérémy, What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. The current status is : * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably better be using it in testing/sid. Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. Jérémy. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
