On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:44:58PM +0200, Xavier Vello wrote:
> I don't mind if ksysguard depends on ksysguardd or just recommends it, but I
> want that the kdebase-workspace metapackage depends on it, because IMHO
> it's a metapackage's purpose to depend on everything provided by the archive.
>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:24:59 +0200, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should put it in as Depends for now and downgrade if upstream
> considers it optional. I can write them a email (or locate on irc)
I just spoke with upstream.
A few quotes from my irc conversation:
ksysg
Sveiki,
Tuesday 08 July 2008, Xavier Vello rašė:
> So that's what I propose :
> ksysguard recommends ksysguardd
> kdebase-workspace depends on ksysguardd
+1. I proposed this on IRC too.
--
Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 08:44:58 Xavier Vello wrote:
> I don't mind if ksysguard depends on ksysguardd or just recommends it, but
> I want that the kdebase-workspace metapackage depends on it, because IMHO
> it's a metapackage's purpose to depend on everything provided by the
> archive. I commited
On Friday 04 July 2008 00:40:03 Ana Guerrero wrote:
> So, we have in the Qt/Debian team the classic Debian problem of 2
> developers not getting along. It started on IRC some time ago and lately
> has spilled on this mailing list. It has been there for some time now, but
> it grow a lot with the pa
I don't mind if ksysguard depends on ksysguardd or just recommends it, but I
want that the kdebase-workspace metapackage depends on it, because IMHO
it's a metapackage's purpose to depend on everything provided by the archive.
I commited it and someone reverted without explanation.
Furthermore, i
