On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:24:59 +0200, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should put it in as Depends for now and downgrade if upstream
> considers it optional. I can write them a email (or locate on irc)
I just spoke with upstream.
A few quotes from my irc conversation:
<me> ksysguardd is expected to work without ksysguard available. How true
is the opposite ?
<upstream> not very
<me> we are in debian currently discussing wether ksysguardd should be
optional (Recommends in debian language) for ksysguard or mandatory
<upstream> I have never tested ksysguard without ksysguardd :-)
<upstream> besides, ksysguardd is a tiny program :)
There doesn't seem to be much possibilities of interpretating this in