Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

Hi Steve, On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:08:45PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > DigiKam itself currently uses (Qt4-version) libqtwebkit-dev. I saw the bug > about it and the web page https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4WebKitRemoval > What I haven't seen is a precise time for this. The schedule for

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

Just for clarity: I'm talking about digikam not a new package. On December 28, 2015 6:07:12 AM CST, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >Hi Steve, > >On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:08:45PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> DigiKam itself currently uses (Qt4-version) libqtwebkit-dev. I saw

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

Hi Steve, On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 07:30:52AM -0600, Steve Robbins wrote: > Just for clarity: I'm talking about digikam not a new package. Oh, I missed the fact that digikam is already depending on qtwebkit. Then, indeed, please ignore my message and go ahead (as Lisandro said). -- Dmitry

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

On Monday 28 December 2015 15:07:12 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:08:45PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > DigiKam itself currently uses (Qt4-version) libqtwebkit-dev. I saw the > > bug > > about it and the web page https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4WebKitRemoval >

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

On Monday 28 December 2015 15:40:14 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: [snip] > We need a kf5-based kdepim in unstable first. I was told that current > packages in experimental are not ready for unstable yet. For what it's worth digikam is already in the archive, so just go ahead Steve.

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

On Sunday 27 December 2015 12:08:45 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot to all who responded. I sense a strong feeling against > introducing new Qt4-based packages right now. And this makes sense to me. > > Given that my only motivation for a Qt4 version of these libraries is for >

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

On Tuesday 22 December 2015 15:52:00 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 07:08:06AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > It's not a new package. It was just behind several releases and the > > question was to either update to the last Qt4 release or an unreleased Qt5 > >

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 03:52:00 PM Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 07:08:06AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > It's not a new package. It was just behind several releases and the > > question was to either update to the last Qt4 release or an unreleased Qt5

Re: Building DigiKam 4.14 with libkgeomanip and other former "extras"

[Since the conversation is now Debian-specific, I trimmed digikam-devel] On December 21, 2015 12:54:46 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Sunday 20 December 2015 17:22:07 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > Question 1: Given that I'm building DigiKam 4.x, I presume I'll need a > >