You can be assured that with corporate users, the decision process about IT
deployments is more sophisticated than let's take this Linux CD, click
on 'Desktop', and see what happens.
off-topic
We don't have only corporate users. By the way, some IT deployments are
let's use default not more.
Hi,
IMHO, I prefer dch multimaintainer mode implementation.
by the way, we can start to use this scheme manually, no need to wait for dch
changes.
package (1.2.3-4) experimental; urgency=low
[ Joe User ]
* doing foo
* doing bar
[ Jane Hacker ]
* Something third
* Something fourth
On Friday 09 January 2009 17:18:42 Ana Guerrero wrote:
I hope the website is a bit clearer now. Still have to update the
instructions for lenny.
done.
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Hi,
after noticing a git archive for kde-extra too, I wonder how/when to use
svn/git. Is there an idea or is it more personal preference? If the plan is
to migrate I would suggest to use git for KDE4 stuff.
Comments anyone?
sorry to reply 2 weeks later.
I didn't know some kde-extras
Hi Jeremy :)
Author: sharky
Date: 2009-02-24 06:53:08 + (Tue, 24 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 13871
Modified:
branches/kde4/packages/kdevplatform/debian/kdevplatform-dev.install
branches/kde4/packages/kdevplatform/debian/rules
Log:
fix
kdevplatform up-to-date stuff is in trunk.
the
Hi,
we could probably fix this minor issue:
1) without insulting people:
08:57 pusling but ehm. whoever acked the kdevplatform package as it
is now should really learn about library packaging before actually
uploading new libraries and ask for a rejection of kdevplatform until
done so.
2)
Hi,
kdevplatform and kdevelop are the last missing KDE4 modules in Sid.
kdevplatform is waiting in NEW since a month and we are waiting it before
uploading kdevelop.
could you take a look at it please ? TIA.
cheers,
Fathi
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Welcome
I will do that, thanks.
Added.
Well, This is what Sune Vuorela wrote after I suggested this on
-mentors in slrnh169k3.720.nos...@sshway.ssh.pusling.com:
Who is right ?
We had a discussion on the subject and disagree as you can see.
We didn't reached a consensus about sponsors
Hi,
very late reply but QPrinter needs love.
ask Pino Toscano (okular), I guess he has many things to say about it.
cheers,
Fathi
On Monday 15 June 2009 19:12:44 Ana Guerrero wrote:
- Forwarded message from Knut Yrvin knut.yr...@nokia.com -
From: Knut Yrvin knut.yr...@nokia.com
Hi all,
As Sune: I'm fine for the tar.bz2 tarball but I need a closer look to
dpkg-source format 3.0.
cheers,
Fathi
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
My only request is that we document the workflow in something like:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/kde-extras/README
This is so we can get the workflow documented and give those of us git
newbies over the line.
Qt contains a README.source:
Do we move all of kde-extras to git too?
yes
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Fabo, do you know when is Qt 4.7 being released? :) I have not idea about
approx dates and we need them if we are about to tell our plans to the
release team. Actually, it might be a good idea to handle this separately?
We could expect Qt 4.7.0 being released on 1st week of September .
Hi,
I created a wiki page with the details:
http://wiki.debian.org/QtMultiarchTransition
What I don't know yet is how to proceed from there?
Obviously coordination is required whatever the plan is.
It worths mentioning that current Qt in Sid fails to build on IA64 architecture.
We could upload
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:27 PM, George Kiagiadakis
kiagiadakis.geo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Praveen A prav...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/23 Fathi Boudra f...@debian.org:
Hi,
I created a wiki page with the details:
http://wiki.debian.org/QtMultiarchTransition
What
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Sune Vuorela s...@vuorela.dk wrote:
Hi
I think we should remove the xine backend from the archive
- it is completely abandoned upstream
- it is broken for amarok users
- it is buggy
- it is installed by default in stable, so users won't automaticalyl get
16 matches
Mail list logo
