new package needing review & sponsor

checked) and I need to go to the next step : getting into experimental. That's why I'm searching for a debian maintainer to review and sponsor my upload. -- Xavier Vello -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: rev 11376 - in branches/kde4/packages/kdebase-workspace/debian: . patches

on. Furthermore, it would fix the issue of users not getting it if they disable recommends, while letting the powerusers remove it. So that's what I propose : ksysguard recommends ksysguardd kdebase-workspace depends on ksysguardd -- Xavier Vello -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mail

Re: Classic Debian problem

anches/kde4/packages/kdebase-workspace/debian: . patches" thread (just saying "I agree with this argument" helps) so that we can take a decision together. Thanks and sorry for the long email. -- Xavier Vello -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: rev 11376 - in branches/kde4/packages/kdebase-workspace/debian: . patches

tions. > > /Sune As someone stated on IRC, the debian policy says : The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together with this one in all but unusual installations. Which corresponds to this situation. Do you agree ? Does anyone have another id

a little bit of cleaning

reassign 482457 gtk-qt-engine-kde4 # see last comment fixed 482841 4:4.0.98-1 # to be closed tag 484855 pending # need to reupload meta-kde4 fixed 490952 4:4.0.98-1 # to be closed thanks -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Some notes on my switch to KDE 4.1

n issues we don't have a policy about yet. There have been some talks about this in the team. I didn't know the panel issue btw, but don't see an easy way to fix it automatically. Regards -- Xavier Vello -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Re: Some notes on my switch to KDE 4.1

ou mean, I should open a bug report for kontact for the missing dependency > on kmail? Hello After some research, it turns out that kontact recommends kmail (it's not a dependency as it can work without it), but dpkg doesn't understand version requirements for recommends, so there's

getfem++

ion. What do you think ? Homepage : http://home.gna.org/getfem/ Source and binary packages (it is uploaded to experimental, waiting in NEW) : http://alioth.debian.org/~wdgt-guest/getfem++/ SVN folder of the packaging : svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-kde/krap/getfem++/trunk/debian Regards -- Xa

Re: Uploads to lenny and the $KDEHOME dilemma

ithout messing up the kde4 configuration. If not, we have to disable these KCMs too. -- Xavier Vello -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

Vacancy notice

get back to the team in september. Regards -- Xavier Vello -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk