vlc_0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
vlc_0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3.dsc
vlc_0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3.diff.gz
vlc_0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3_amd64.deb
vlc-nox_0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3_amd64.deb
libvlc0_0.8.6.h-4+lenny2.3_amd64.deb
Package: ardour
Version: 1:2.8.6-1+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Hi
Since I upgraded to jack-1.9.5, Ardour fails in time synchronisation with jack.
If I have recorded a track and I want to play it again then it is not possible.
Even if I do a 'rewind' with jack, Ardour always starts playing at
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
alpha, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, s390 and sparc the build
failed. On my local machine (i386), the Ubuntu Launchpad PPA builders
(i386, amd64 and
Does this mean we should just add procps as a build dependency? Surely
it should be in buildd anyway as it has a standard priority?
-- Forwarded message --
From: salsa...@xs4all.nl
Date: 11 May 2010 16:48
Subject: Re: LiVES 1.3.3 failing to build
To: Harry Rickards
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
alpha, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips,
On 11 May 2010 16:53, salsa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine, whereas on
alpha, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:58, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 16:53, salsa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that
On 11 May 2010 17:00, salsa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that armel, hppa and both kfreebsds built 1.3.3-1 fine,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 18:02, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 17:00, salsa...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 17:27, Harry Rickards wrote:
On 11 May 2010 16:22, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
From https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lives I can see
that
FYI: The status of the mplayer source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0~rc3+svn20090405-1
Current version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens
FYI: The status of the jack-audio-connection-kit source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.118+svn3796-2
Current version: 1.9.5~dfsg-13
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
If possible, can you upload this?
I'll do it ASAP.
--
Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com
Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 17:51:26 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
Does this mean we should just add procps as a build dependency? Surely
it should be in buildd anyway as it has a standard priority?
I think so, yes.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
On 11 May 2010 19:16, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 17:51:26 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
Does this mean we should just add procps as a build dependency? Surely
it should be in buildd anyway as it has a standard priority?
I think so, yes.
Turns out
lives_1.3.3-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lives_1.3.3-2.dsc
lives_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
lives_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
libweed0_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
libweed-dev_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
lives-data_1.3.3-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
Accepted:
libweed-dev_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
to main/l/lives/libweed-dev_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
libweed0_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
to main/l/lives/libweed0_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
lives-data_1.3.3-2_all.deb
to main/l/lives/lives-data_1.3.3-2_all.deb
lives_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
to main/l/lives/lives_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Turns out that pgrep wasn't actually required at build, but was a
false ./configure check. I've added a patch in Git to fix this and
Alessio says he will upload ASAP.
Done.
BTW, we may save a patch by adding a
Package: mplayer
Version: 1.0~rc3+svn20090405-1+b1
Severity: normal
Hello,
--disable-arts disappeared from debian/rules, so mplayer
2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-2 picked up an unwanted dependency on libartsc0. I
know it is unwanted because there is no corresponding build-depends.
-- System
clone 581225 -1
reassign -1 libsdl1.2-dev
block 581225 by -1
stop
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 20:54:26 (CEST), Marc Glisse wrote:
--disable-arts disappeared from debian/rules, so mplayer
2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-2 picked up an unwanted dependency on libartsc0. I
know it is unwanted because there is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 581225 -1
Bug#581225: mplayer: extra dependency on arts
Bug 581225 cloned as bug 581231.
reassign -1 libsdl1.2-dev
Bug #581231 [mplayer] mplayer: extra dependency on arts
Bug reassigned from package 'mplayer' to 'libsdl1.2-dev'.
Bug No
package: mplayer
severity: serious
version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-2
tags: security
an integer underflow was fixed in a recent DSA, but is still vulnerable
in the latest mplayer in unstable. see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2010/msg00085.html
Your message dated Tue, 11 May 2010 18:31:36 -0400
with message-id 20100511183136.7f6b22d4.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #407010,
regarding mplayer: multiple segmentation faults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
23 matches
Mail list logo
