Re: fdk-aac: who knows more?

2013-04-07 Thread Romain Beauxis
Been reading the license. It's nice to point out explicit terms that are deemed non-free to back-up any claim, otherwise it sounds like FUD.. The part of the license that does not seem DFSG-compliant to me is this one: You may not charge copyright license fees for anyone to use, copy or

Bug#636071: dssi-dev requires libasound2-dev

2011-07-30 Thread Romain Beauxis
Package: dssi-dev Version: 1.1.0-3 Severity: normal Hi! dssi.h requires an alsa header provided by libasound2-dev. Therefore, it seems to me that libasound2-dev should be a binary-dep of dssi-dev. Romain -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy:

Re: lame_3.98.4+repack2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-07-29 Thread Romain Beauxis
2011/7/29 Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org: Accepted: lame-doc_3.98.4+repack2-1_all.deb  to main/l/lame/lame-doc_3.98.4+repack2-1_all.deb (...) Guys, I am impressed, really impressed... Thanks you all! Romain ___

Bug#627818: ffmpeg segmentation fault __memcpy_ssse3 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memcpy-ssse3.S:119

2011-05-24 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi all, 2011/5/24 Marco Mattiolo marco.matti...@hotmail.it: Hi. I'm having a problem with ffmpeg, converting flv downloaded by youtube-dl to audio-only ogg vorbis. I had debian-multimedia repo enabled, so I purged all packages related to that repo, before generating this bugreport. Hope

Bug#624274: produces invalid streams

2011-04-26 Thread Romain Beauxis
Package: libvo-aacenc0 Version: 0.1.0~rc1-1 Severity: normal Streams produced by libvo-aacenc0 as present in package 0.1.0~rc1-1 produces invalid streams, including with the example provided upstream. This can be noticed with mplayer for instance, which logs the following errors: A: 36.5 (36.5)

Re: lame_3.98.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2011-04-19 Thread Romain Beauxis
2011/4/19 Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org: Am 19.04.2011 21:02, schrieb Sebastian Dröge: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:56 +, Torsten Werner wrote: the package fails to comply with the LGPL. Quoting from the top level README:   (LGPL, see www.gnu.org) with the following modification:   ...

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Romain Beauxis
:33:41AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote: I agree though I am not sure whether Gerardo and Ivan were talking about icecast 1 or 2.. I any case, I believe they are welcome to maintain either of them among the multimedia team, right ? Sure!  Except if it is v1 they want to maintain and this team

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Romain Beauxis
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:48:06AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Ivan Diaz saisyukusan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Hi Ivan and Gerardo! Yes you are right, icecast2 is the only active

Package should be removed..

2011-01-31 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi! I just discovered this package.. I believe it should be removed, icecast2 has been around for a while now and is a clear alternative.. Romain ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

2011-01-27 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le jeudi 27 janvier 2011 03:33:40, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : Am 27.01.2011 00:48, schrieb Alessio Treglia: I've been thinking that maybe our audience would like to know what the Dear Debian Multimedia Team has planned to do for Wheezy (if there's something already planned), so now that

Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]

2011-01-27 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le jeudi 27 janvier 2011 03:33:40, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : Am 27.01.2011 00:48, schrieb Alessio Treglia: I've been thinking that maybe our audience would like to know what the Dear Debian Multimedia Team has planned to do for Wheezy (if there's something already planned), so now that

Re: Ocaml-bjack.

2010-09-14 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 00:44:32, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : The straight-forward solution would be to change this dependency to libjack-jackd2-dev | libjack-dev but I would like to know if this is the solution you would advise. No, we really want to use the headers from the

Re: Ocaml-bjack.

2010-09-13 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le lundi 13 septembre 2010 05:51:15, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : On Fr, Sep 10, 2010 at 23:02:05 (CEST), Romain Beauxis wrote: Hi all, I just realized that the binNMU of libbjack-ocaml(-dev) was not sufficient because libbjack-ocaml-dev declares a dependency on libjack-dev

Ocaml-bjack.

2010-09-10 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi all, I just realized that the binNMU of libbjack-ocaml(-dev) was not sufficient because libbjack-ocaml-dev declares a dependency on libjack-dev. I think it is reasonable to have a dependency on the -dev package of a library when installing the corresponding ocaml -dev binding, so I