On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:18:23PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:36:09PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
1. Make all jack implementations provide: libjack-dev. This leaves
us with unversionable
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:18:23PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
We need not change anything now, just use a more meaningful tag than
next time we want to bump.
I think this makes most sense. (although it does require renaming
libjack-dev to libjack-jackd1-dev and making it Provide:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:08:25PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
So long story short: it seems the only change reguired right now is the
updated jackd2 package with libjack-jackd2-dev Provides: libjack-dev.
And that's already built and waiting for an upload on my system. Just
give me the OK in
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:08, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:18:23PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
We need not change anything now, just use a more meaningful tag than
next time we want to bump.
I think this makes most sense. (although it does
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:39:07AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:08, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:18:23PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
We need not change anything now, just use a more meaningful tag
than next time we
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:36:09PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm not happy with the way currently we need to add alternative
build-depends on the different libjack implementations. Possible ways
out of this problem:
1. Make all jack implementations provide: libjack-dev. This leaves us
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:33:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Unless there's really a need to discuss this in detail, I'd simply
upload the new version today.
so you don't care about unversionable build-depends? this means that not
a single package in the archive can then do
On Mo, Okt 25, 2010 at 17:20:58 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:33:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Unless there's really a need to discuss this in detail, I'd simply
upload the new version today.
so you don't care about unversionable build-depends? this means
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Mo, Okt 25, 2010 at 17:20:58 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:33:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Unless there's really a need to discuss this in detail, I'd simply
upload the new version today.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:36:09PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
1. Make all jack implementations provide: libjack-dev. This leaves us
with unversionable build-depends.
When versioning is needed, the requirement is either a
10 matches
Mail list logo
