My favourite approach would be to check out the actual packaging
including the upstream sources from git.debian.org (e.g. via
gbp-clone), check out the latest tag, and then compile and build the
package using git-buildpackage.
Am 20.09.2012 13:41, schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
due to fears of
Hi Fabian,
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:33:02 Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 20.09.2012 13:41, schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
due to fears of running afoul of DMCA-style laws etc.
That sounds better at least.
I re-phrased to
libdvdcss is a free software but Debian is not shipping it
due to fears of
Hi Team,
I'm looking for feedback for my libdvdcss-pkg package.
Do you think the implementation is feasible?
Any ideas how it can be improved
or it is technically ready for upload?
Source package is available from:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/libd/libdvdcss-pkg
Hi Dmitry,
and thanks for your work on this.
Am 20.09.2012 08:54, schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
Any ideas how it can be improved
or it is technically ready for upload?
I just had a short look, but to me this looks overly complicated. Why
do we have to download the sources and build them into a
Hi Fabian,
Thank you for taking time and sharing your thoughts.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:10:26 Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I just had a short look, but to me this looks overly complicated. Why
do we have to download the sources and build them into a separate
package and then install this one - all
Am 20.09.2012 12:03, schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
Could you suggest a better wording please?
How to express better why we're not shipping from main repository and why
we're asking for user's discression to build the package?
We shouldn't even attempt to touch legal ground. Just tell the users
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:33:43 Fabian Greffrath wrote:
We shouldn't even attempt to touch legal ground. Just tell the users
where they can find more information, e.g.
http://www.videolan.org/developers/libdvdcss.html, and that they are
using it at their own risk.
I believe our users deserve to
