Re: JACK1 to JACK2 wants to rip out all JACK related packages

2010-08-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:29:14 (CEST), i...@bandshed.net wrote: Hi, I have been playing around with both JACK1 and JACK2 for the last little while. Since I distribute AV Linux I settled on JACK1 because it seemed to have much better across the board compatibility with a broader range of

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Indeed this looks weird. If you consider it sane to use this approach then I guess it won't matter much. But striving towards the ultimate, if this is a dirty hack then please elaborate on possible alternative approaches - even if tricky to

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: We should simply suppress the sse flag on 32bit x86, in my opinion. Or if it really hurts, we should either a) offer to variants or b) convince upstream to implement support for both and detect at runtime if optimized code whould be used or not.

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-23 09:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: anyhow, i had a look at the debian policy, and it says (in chapter 10.2 Libraries on todays http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html): If the package is architecture: any, then the

Re: [SCM] dssi packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.0.0-1-6-g06b5c40

2010-08-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:27:24 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: Can you please explain this? On what basis do we want to build against jackd2 instead of jackd1? this indicates that dssi works also when built

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:35:24 (CEST), IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-08-22 20:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: We should simply suppress the sse flag on 32bit x86, in my opinion. Or if it really hurts, we should either a) offer to variants or b) convince upstream to implement support

Re: [SCM] dssi packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.0.0-1-6-g06b5c40

2010-08-23 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: No, but I want to avoid that other maintainers pick up this as bad example espc. when they are unsure about the situation and don't know what to do. In the next upload, please properly document that this is an

Re: pd-zexy compilation improvements

2010-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-23 09:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote: If they are indeed in non-standard paths such that the dynamic linker doesn't see it without setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH or similar, then you're right. But.. nevertheless, it complies with it... even on amd64? There are some architectures that are

Processing of naspro-core_0.2.0-1_i386.changes

2010-08-23 Thread Archive Administrator
naspro-core_0.2.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: naspro-core_0.2.0-1.dsc naspro-core_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz naspro-core_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz libnacore2_0.2.0-1_i386.deb libnacore-dev_0.2.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Re: Defining interesting multimedia tasks

2010-08-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:18:47AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: I particularily like https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications, which is linked from the PackageList page! We should write

naspro-core_0.2.0-1_i386.changes is NEW

2010-08-23 Thread Archive Administrator
(new) libnacore-dev_0.2.0-1_all.deb optional libdevel The NASPRO core library (development files) A tiny convenience library containing useful code to implement LV2 dynamic manifest plugins and especially bridges from other APIs to LV2. . This package includes the development tools. (new)

Re: Defining interesting multimedia tasks

2010-08-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:14:06 (CEST), Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:18:47AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote: I particularily like https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications,

Re: [SCM] dssi packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.0.0-1-6-g06b5c40

2010-08-23 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote: JFTR: jackd2 has no jack-session support, yet. Jack session is only available in jackd1-svn atm, but you probably already know. ;) Oh man, what an idiot... Of couse I have noticed that in some upstream's documents

Processing of permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.changes

2010-08-23 Thread Archive Administrator
permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: permafrost_0.2.0-1.dsc permafrost_0.2.0.orig.tar.gz permafrost_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.changes is NEW

2010-08-23 Thread Archive Administrator
(new) permafrost_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound (new) permafrost_0.2.0-1.dsc optional sound (new) permafrost_0.2.0-1_i386.deb optional sound DSP language designed with physics-based modeling in mind This package contains a compiler for such language which generates C source code and

Re: Defining interesting multimedia tasks

2010-08-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Well, the most obvious pieces of information missing are a) what version of the package is included in lenny and squeeze, and b) link to the package documentation. Do you mean the information is missing on the long list[1]

Bug#399292: mplayer: MPlayer rc1 can't be properly scaled by WM on start

2010-08-23 Thread Reinhard Tartler
reassign 399292 mplayer,kwin severity 399292 minor tags 399292 upstream,help thanks On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:04:08 (CEST), Alexander Dorokhine wrote: Sorry, there is a misunderstanding regarding what is working. Scaling works fine as long as it is done after the movie starts. If I start

Processed: Re: Bug#399292: mplayer: MPlayer rc1 can't be properly scaled by WM on start

2010-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 399292 mplayer,kwin Bug #399292 [mplayer] mplayer: MPlayer rc1 can't be properly scaled by WM on start Bug reassigned from package 'mplayer' to 'mplayer,kwin'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions mplayer/1.0~rc1-3. severity 399292

Re: Should libjack-jackd2-dev provide libjack-dev?

2010-08-23 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:14:11PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: I can't install jack2 in my development box... Or is some other way to do this? Yeah, that's a problem. I added libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev to some build-deps, but that's nothing more than a crude hack. We somehow want some

Re: Should libjack-jackd2-dev provide libjack-dev?

2010-08-23 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 23/08/10 11:34, Adrian Knoth wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:14:11PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: I can't install jack2 in my development box... Or is some other way to do this? Yeah, that's a problem. I added libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev to some build-deps, but that's nothing

Bug#594093: mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11 (-vo sdl works)?

2010-08-23 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
I can reproduce this on amd64: 1) vnc4server -depth 24 :1 2) xvnc4viewer -passwd .vnc/passwd localhost:1 3) DISPLAY=:1 mplayer -vo x11 -nosound 1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Bug#594108: ffmpeg: documented example fails: Unrecognized option 'vfilters'

2010-08-23 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: ffmpeg Version: 4:0.6-2 Severity: normal /usr/share/doc/ffmpeg/html/libavfilter.html contains the example ffmpeg -i in.avi -vfilters crop=0:0:0:240 out.avi but it seems to fail: $ wget

[bts-link] source package dirac

2010-08-23 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package dirac # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #564976 (http://bugs.debian.org/564976) # *

Processed: tagging 582274

2010-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 582274 - wontfix Bug #582274 {Done: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de} [ffmpeg] ffmpeg: VP8/WebM Removed tag(s) wontfix. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 582274:

Bug#594110: mencoder -lavcopts acodec=libvorbis segfaults

2010-08-23 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: mencoder Version: 2:1.0~rc3++final.dfsg1-1 Severity: normal Steps to reproduce: 1) wget http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/low/1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv 2) mencoder 1050_Lightning_talk_Redirecting_require.ogv -oac lavc -lavcopts acodec=libvorbis

[ivo...@videolan.org: Bug#594122: ITP: multicat -- Set of tools for multicast and transport stream manipulation]

2010-08-23 Thread Rémi Duraffort
-- Rémi Duraffort | ivoire ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rémi Duraffort ivo...@videolan.org * Package name: multicat Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Christophe Massiot * URL : http://www.videolan.org/projects/multicat.html * License

Re: [SCM] multicat packaging branch, pristine-tar, created. 8310c858374a1a6643c1e22ade6ba88f1e61351f

2010-08-23 Thread Alessio Treglia
Hi! On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:11 PM, ivoire-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The branch, pristine-tar has been created at 8310c858374a1a6643c1e22ade6ba88f1e61351f (commit) - Shortlog commit

Re: [SCM] pd-pmpd packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/0.9-4-g86cd593

2010-08-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:18:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 21/08/10 18:00, eighthave-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit b50fc79d8a856062d9a05100dd83a7fca3bf696b

Re: 2nd package in Pd batch uploaded: pd-pmpd

2010-08-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Aug 21, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: (Please don't CC me) On 21/08/10 18:02, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 15:45 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 21/08/10 15:10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Ok, so we got pd-motex uploaded, and I've been applying all the