On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:25:24 (EDT), mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
> +Files: ./DotEmacs
> +Copyright: 2001 Fernando Lopez Lezcano
> +License: no licence mentioned
uh, does no license mean "all rights reserved" and are we actually
allowed to redistribute it?
more seriously, are
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:19:54 (EDT), HacKurx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We meet a lot of problems with mkv files in VLC 1.0.6.
> Can you pass to vlc 1.1 before the freeze Sqeeze packages for debian?
> This version uses fewer resources and has a support vdpau.
> Thank you for your work.
http://release.de
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:13:22 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:40:09 -0400, Reinhard Tartler
> wrote:
>> So let's check:
>>
>> | vlc | 0.8.6.release.e+x264svn20071224+faad2.6.1-0ubuntu3.3 |
>> hardy-updates/universe | source
>> | vlc | 0.9.9a-2ubuntu1 | jaunty/multiv
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:13 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> Ping maintainers and debian security team. Indicate the security
>> issue, the patch and or new tarball.
>
> It's not like it's not known:
> http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/stable
it lists 4 CVEs: CVE-
On 13/07/10 18:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:27:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> In csound, we build depend on default-jdk-builddep, which is wrong (as
>> per /usr/share/doc/java-common/README.gcj-native-transition). The
>> correct build dependency is default-jdk (sin
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:32:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#577527: fixed in zita-convolver 2.0.0really2.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #577527,
regarding [libzita-convolver-dev] package should depend on libfftw3-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Accepted:
libzita-convolver-dev_2.0.0really2.0.0-1_i386.deb
to main/z/zita-convolver/libzita-convolver-dev_2.0.0really2.0.0-1_i386.deb
libzita-convolver2_2.0.0really2.0.0-1_i386.deb
to main/z/zita-convolver/libzita-convolver2_2.0.0really2.0.0-1_i386.deb
zita-convolver_2.0.0really2.0.0-1.debi
zita-convolver_2.0.0really2.0.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
zita-convolver_2.0.0really2.0.0-1.dsc
zita-convolver_2.0.0really2.0.0.orig.tar.bz2
zita-convolver_2.0.0really2.0.0-1.debian.tar.gz
libzita-convolver-dev_2.0.0really2.0.0-1_i386.deb
lib
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:27:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
In csound, we build depend on default-jdk-builddep, which is wrong (as
per /usr/share/doc/java-common/README.gcj-native-transition). The
correct build dependency is default-jdk (since we are not using gcj to
compile java to native
On 13/07/10 18:14, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Neither of those packages has been uploaded, so I'd say just trash them
>> and start afresh.
>>
>
> Felipe,
>
> zita-convolver is available in testing [1], or did you mean trashing
> old reposi
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Neither of those packages has been uploaded, so I'd say just trash them
> and start afresh.
>
Felipe,
zita-convolver is available in testing [1], or did you mean trashing
old repositories?
--
Alessio Treglia
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
On 13/07/10 18:06, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> both zita-convolver and zita-convolver2 repositories are a mess, and
> the contents of the orig.tar.gz of the current package is not the same
> of the tar.bz2 available from upstream's homepage.
>
> Probably we need to repack the tarball
Hello guys,
both zita-convolver and zita-convolver2 repositories are a mess, and
the contents of the orig.tar.gz of the current package is not the same
of the tar.bz2 available from upstream's homepage.
Probably we need to repack the tarball and play a bit with the
versioning (I thought to releas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 521768 588747
Bug#521768: ITP: xjadeo -- Video player with jack sync
Bug#588747: ITP: xjadeo - Simple video player that receives sync from jackd or
MTC
Forcibly Merged 521768 588747.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
In csound, we build depend on default-jdk-builddep, which is wrong (as
per /usr/share/doc/java-common/README.gcj-native-transition). The
correct build dependency is default-jdk (since we are not using gcj to
compile java to native code). However, I noticed we resolve the
java-enabled archs by parsi
> % apt-cache rdepends libvlc2
> libvlc2
> Reverse Depends:
> vlc-nox
> mozilla-plugin-vlc
> libvlc-dev
> % apt-cache showsrc vlc-nox libvlc-dev mozilla-plugin-vlc| \
> grep Package: | uniq
> Package: vlc
>
>
> So the ABI issue is a non-issue, since nobody uses libvlc outside of vlc
> i
On Tue, Jul 13, 10 at 16:19 +0200, HacKurx wrote:
> We meet a lot of problems with mkv files in VLC 1.0.6.
> Can you pass to vlc 1.1 before the freeze Sqeeze packages for debian?
It needs to follow the proper process i.e. being old enough and having
no rc bugs and having all it depedencies in sque
On 13/07/10 08:40, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:49:15 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:28:59 +0200, Benjamin Drung
>> wrote:
>>> I doubt that we can pull a new upstream version into a stable Ubuntu
>>> release (e.g. vlc 1.1.0 in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 577527 pending
Bug #577527 [libzita-convolver-dev] [libzita-convolver-dev] package should
depend on libfftw3-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
577527: http://bugs.debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 577527 pending
Bug #577527 [libzita-convolver-dev] [libzita-convolver-dev] package should
depend on libfftw3-dev
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #577527 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Accepted:
create-resources_0.1.3-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/c/create-resources/create-resources_0.1.3-3.debian.tar.gz
create-resources_0.1.3-3.dsc
to main/c/create-resources/create-resources_0.1.3-3.dsc
create-resources_0.1.3-3_all.deb
to main/c/create-resources/create-resources_0.1.3-3_all.d
create-resources_0.1.3-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
create-resources_0.1.3-3.dsc
create-resources_0.1.3-3.debian.tar.gz
create-resources_0.1.3-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:40:09 -0400, Reinhard Tartler
wrote:
> So let's check:
>
> | vlc | 0.8.6.release.e+x264svn20071224+faad2.6.1-0ubuntu3.3 |
> hardy-updates/universe | source
> | vlc | 0.9.9a-2ubuntu1 | jaunty/multiverse | source, amd64, i386
> | vlc | 1.0.2-1ubuntu2 | karmic/universe | sour
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:22:11 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> 2010/7/12 Rémi Denis-Courmont :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think it is fair to say that there is increasing frustration from
>> users and developers w.r.t. the state of VLC in Debian & Ubuntu. I am
>> left wondering what is the best way
[sorry for the resent, it seems the CC line was wrong in the previous mail]
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 14:54:53 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it is fair to say that there is increasing frustration from users and
> developers w.r.t. the state of VLC in Debian & Ubuntu.
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:18:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#521768: fixed in xjadeo 0.4.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #521768,
regarding ITP: xjadeo -- Video player with jack sync
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Accepted:
xjadeo_0.4.10-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/x/xjadeo/xjadeo_0.4.10-1.debian.tar.gz
xjadeo_0.4.10-1.dsc
to main/x/xjadeo/xjadeo_0.4.10-1.dsc
xjadeo_0.4.10-1_i386.deb
to main/x/xjadeo/xjadeo_0.4.10-1_i386.deb
xjadeo_0.4.10.orig.tar.gz
to main/x/xjadeo/xjadeo_0.4.10.orig.tar.gz
Overri
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 02:49:15 (EDT), Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>Hello,
>
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:28:59 +0200, Benjamin Drung
> wrote:
>> I doubt that we can pull a new upstream version into a stable Ubuntu
>> release (e.g. vlc 1.1.0 in Ubuntu 10.04), because the new version breaks
>> the
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 13:26:17 (EDT), Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> Does Debian have any sort of policy about when there should and should
> not be a -dbg package?
>
> As an upstream author, I personally prefer having -dbg packages for all
> packages.
I think this question deserves a more ge
Hi maintainer!
I'm sorry, but your debian/copyright file is incomplete.
Some undocumented examples I found:
bess.rb, Michael Scholz, 2-Clause BSD
bess1.rb, Michael Scholz, GPLv2+
dlocsig.rb, Michael Scholz, GPLv2+
dlocsig.scm, Fernando Lopez Lezcano, "as long as no fees or compensation are
char
Thanks, this is now fixed.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Dear matroska developers,
>
> Jonas Smedegaard has found a bug in your web pages / web server, please
> find his explanations below:
>
> Am 12.07.2010 14:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>
>> The libebml page inten
Accepted:
das-watchdog_0.9.0-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/d/das-watchdog/das-watchdog_0.9.0-2.debian.tar.gz
das-watchdog_0.9.0-2.dsc
to main/d/das-watchdog/das-watchdog_0.9.0-2.dsc
das-watchdog_0.9.0-2_i386.deb
to main/d/das-watchdog/das-watchdog_0.9.0-2_i386.deb
Override entries for your pac
das-watchdog_0.9.0-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
das-watchdog_0.9.0-2.dsc
das-watchdog_0.9.0-2.debian.tar.gz
das-watchdog_0.9.0-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
_
33 matches
Mail list logo