puredata-import_1.3-1_amd64.changes is NEW
(new) puredata-import_1.3-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound (new) puredata-import_1.3-1.dsc optional sound (new) puredata-import_1.3-1_amd64.deb optional sound Pd object for loading libraries within a patch Aiming to provide a simplified Python-style import for Pure Data, this import object loads libraries as part of a patch. It will load anything that Pd considers a library, including libraries that are defined by Pd loaders like 'libdir'. . This package is meant only for vanilla Pure Data, as pd-extended provides this functionality built-in. (new) puredata-import_1.3.orig.tar.gz optional sound Changes: puredata-import (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release (Closes: #596718) * Fixed puredata Depends. Override entries for your package: Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 596718 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of puredata-import_1.3-1_amd64.changes
puredata-import_1.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: puredata-import_1.3-1.dsc puredata-import_1.3.orig.tar.gz puredata-import_1.3-1.debian.tar.gz puredata-import_1.3-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: next, two small, weird-ish packages: puredata-import and pd-libdir
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 00:34, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 23:54 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 23:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> > Your changes make sense to me, looks ready for uploading as far as I am >> > concerned. >> >> Please update the changelog (I would not like to put my name in your work >> ;)). > > Done! Uploading... -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: next, two small, weird-ish packages: puredata-import and pd-libdir
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 23:54 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 23:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Your changes make sense to me, looks ready for uploading as far as I am > > concerned. > > Please update the changelog (I would not like to put my name in your work ;)). Done! .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: next, two small, weird-ish packages: puredata-import and pd-libdir
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 23:27, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Your changes make sense to me, looks ready for uploading as far as I am > concerned. Please update the changelog (I would not like to put my name in your work ;)). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: next, two small, weird-ish packages: puredata-import and pd-libdir
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 23:17 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 01:01, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >>> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > So the plan for puredata-dev has been pushed off until Pure Data 0.43 > > is > > released and packaged, so I think that the approach used in these two > > packages is going to be necessary for the timebeing. > > > > Can anyone upload these two? They are needed as deps for the rest of > > the > > packages that I have ITP'ed. > > Why did you put the DMUA field before starting your DM application? I > will upload them, although with the field removed until you get your > DM status approved. > >>> > >>> I actually have started my DM application before debconf10. The DebConf > >>> people that I worked with said I should get someone who knows the stuff > >>> that > >>> I package to sponsor my DM application. None of the debconf nyc > >>> localteam > >>> do any multimedia stuff. So at this point, once I find someone willing > >>> to > >>> sponsor me, I can revive my DM application email and complete the > >>> process. > >>> > >>> Sorry if I caused any trouble, I was just trying to make things go > >>> smoother. > >> > >> It's not trouble, just standard practice to put the flag after the DM > >> status is attained. > >> Unfortunately, I cannot in good conscience advocate your DM > >> application until I have further worked with you. Maybe after a few > >> more package uploads ;). > > > > Perfect, I have about 10 that are ready to upload! :-) > > > > > And another question, why does puredata-import depends on puredata (<< > 0.43)? I just uploaded pd-libdir for now. > >>> > >>> Thanks for uploading pd-libdir! puredata 0.43 has changed the way the > >>> headers are installed, so pd libraries that rely on certain headers will > >>> have to change once 0.43 hits the repos. I think its important to get > >>> this > >>> stuff into Debian working with 0.42, and I'm willing to do the legwork of > >>> packaging first for pd 0.42, then updating for 0.43. > >> > >> I understand the need for the build-depends, which is what I read from > >> your description above (pd-libdir has the same restriction). However, > >> puredata-import (the binary package) Depends on puredata << 0.43. Is > >> that intended? If so, please explain why. > > > > Depends: puredata (< 0.43) is a mistake, I think, now that I look at it. > > I'll change it and push the changes once I get the chance. But feel free > > to make the change if you beat me to it. > > Good, I see you fixed this. > > > > >> Also, while we are on it, why the naming scheme change? Shouldn't it > >> be pd-import? > > > > So there are multiple flavors of 'pd' but only one is currently packaged > > (puredata). I am in the process of packaging the other major flavor, > > Pd-extended as pdextended and that package will also provide 'pd'. > > Pd-extended/pdextended has "import" built-in, so it doesn't need the > > "import" from the package. Therefore puredata-import is targeted to only > > 'puredata' not anything that that provides 'pd'. > > I've added a description and removed an unnecesary note on debian/copyright. > Please rephrase the description if it does not conform to pd-speak, > and update the changelog. Then we can upload. Your changes make sense to me, looks ready for uploading as far as I am concerned. .hc ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: next, two small, weird-ish packages: puredata-import and pd-libdir
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 01:01, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner >> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 28, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Hey all, > > So the plan for puredata-dev has been pushed off until Pure Data 0.43 > is > released and packaged, so I think that the approach used in these two > packages is going to be necessary for the timebeing. > > Can anyone upload these two? They are needed as deps for the rest of > the > packages that I have ITP'ed. Why did you put the DMUA field before starting your DM application? I will upload them, although with the field removed until you get your DM status approved. >>> >>> I actually have started my DM application before debconf10. The DebConf >>> people that I worked with said I should get someone who knows the stuff >>> that >>> I package to sponsor my DM application. None of the debconf nyc >>> localteam >>> do any multimedia stuff. So at this point, once I find someone willing >>> to >>> sponsor me, I can revive my DM application email and complete the >>> process. >>> >>> Sorry if I caused any trouble, I was just trying to make things go >>> smoother. >> >> It's not trouble, just standard practice to put the flag after the DM >> status is attained. >> Unfortunately, I cannot in good conscience advocate your DM >> application until I have further worked with you. Maybe after a few >> more package uploads ;). > > Perfect, I have about 10 that are ready to upload! :-) > > And another question, why does puredata-import depends on puredata (<< 0.43)? I just uploaded pd-libdir for now. >>> >>> Thanks for uploading pd-libdir! puredata 0.43 has changed the way the >>> headers are installed, so pd libraries that rely on certain headers will >>> have to change once 0.43 hits the repos. I think its important to get >>> this >>> stuff into Debian working with 0.42, and I'm willing to do the legwork of >>> packaging first for pd 0.42, then updating for 0.43. >> >> I understand the need for the build-depends, which is what I read from >> your description above (pd-libdir has the same restriction). However, >> puredata-import (the binary package) Depends on puredata << 0.43. Is >> that intended? If so, please explain why. > > Depends: puredata (< 0.43) is a mistake, I think, now that I look at it. > I'll change it and push the changes once I get the chance. But feel free > to make the change if you beat me to it. Good, I see you fixed this. > >> Also, while we are on it, why the naming scheme change? Shouldn't it >> be pd-import? > > So there are multiple flavors of 'pd' but only one is currently packaged > (puredata). I am in the process of packaging the other major flavor, > Pd-extended as pdextended and that package will also provide 'pd'. > Pd-extended/pdextended has "import" built-in, so it doesn't need the > "import" from the package. Therefore puredata-import is targeted to only > 'puredata' not anything that that provides 'pd'. I've added a description and removed an unnecesary note on debian/copyright. Please rephrase the description if it does not conform to pd-speak, and update the changelog. Then we can upload. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: SuperCollider package
2010/11/2 Dan S : > 2010/10/31 Felipe Sateler : >> Артём, you are CCed because I don't know if you are subscribed to the list. >> >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:09, Dan S wrote: >>> >>> 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : >>> > Hi all, (Dan CCed because I'm not sure if you are subscribed to the list) >>> > >>> > I managed to take a few minutes to take a look at the package and it is >>> > not in a very good shape (it was still using simple-patchsys!). I have >>> > worked a bit on it, but it still has a long way to go. I will try to >>> > work on it during this week, I think I can find one hour or two. >>> > >>> > Dan, as you are part of upstream, could you comment on the patches >>> > included in the packaging? I can see they are in upstream svn ubuntu >>> > packaging module, with yourself as last commiter on most of them. They >>> > are older than the latest sc release, though. >>> >>> Hi - sorry for slow reply, I missed this thread. Most of the patches >>> are by other people but I will try to comment: >>> >>> 02_disable_elisp_compilation.diff >>> - not sure I'm afraid, it's connected with the emacs sc3 mode, which >>> I don't use. Looks like it might disable something from running simply >>> because the build machine isn't the target machine. >>> >>> 03_fix_elisp_install_path.diff >>> - another emacs mode thing, not sure. >> >> Does anyone use emacs and can comment on wether this should be applied >> upstream? The patch changes the elisp install path from >> /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/supercollider >> >>> >>> 06_deb_scvim.diff >>> - build machine != target machine so don't error out if no ruby executable >>> >>> 07_deb_sced.diff >>> - build machine != target machine so don't modify machine's mime database >> >> Dan, can you comment on whether these can be upstreamed? I don't see >> why they should be debian-specific. > > Right, that makes sense. I've had a look at the scons scripts and not > been able to integrate them in neatly (was hoping to add a nice option > for not-installing-here - if anyone has the scons chops to suggest > something then please do, I'd be grateful.) Can't do it, at least for the time being. > > FYI, supercollider 3.4.1 (bugfix release) has just been agreed, so is > likely to come out very very soon without any further upstreaming. I > hope that doesn't get in the way of debianising... would these patches > be considered blocking issues, do you think? I'm not quite sure what you mean. If you mean that the patches are not likely to be upstreamed before that, then it is no problem, we can continue with the patches. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#583923: marked as done (jackeq: [INTL:de] German translation)
Your message dated Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:47:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583923: fixed in jackeq 0.4.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #583923, regarding jackeq: [INTL:de] German translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 583923: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583923 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: jackeq Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n Hi, please find attached the initial german translation of jackeq. Regards, Chris # German translation of jackEQ. # Copyright (C) 2004 Free Ekanayaka. # This file is distributed under the same license as the jackeq package. # Chris Leick , 2010. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: jackeq 0.4.1-1\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Free Ekanayaka \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2006-04-25 09:53+0700\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2010-05-31 19:24+0100\n" "Last-Translator: Chris Leick \n" "Language-Team: Debian German \n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #: src/interface.c:234 msgid "jackEQ" msgstr "jackEQ" #: src/interface.c:259 msgid "_File" msgstr "_Datei" #: src/interface.c:268 msgid "_About" msgstr "_Ãber" #: src/interface.c:278 msgid "Ports" msgstr "Ports" #: src/interface.c:308 msgid "Monitor" msgstr "Monitor" #: src/interface.c:378 # heiÃt in der Jack-übersetzung auch Master msgid "Master" msgstr "Master" #: src/interface.c:464 src/interface.c:606 src/interface.c:748 #: src/interface.c:890 msgid "Treble" msgstr "Höhen" #: src/interface.c:481 src/interface.c:623 src/interface.c:765 #: src/interface.c:907 # Tonregler: Höhen Mitte Bass msgid "Mid" msgstr "Mitte" #: src/interface.c:498 src/interface.c:640 src/interface.c:782 #: src/interface.c:924 msgid "Bass" msgstr "Bass" #: src/interface.c:515 src/interface.c:657 src/interface.c:799 #: src/interface.c:941 src/interface.c:1367 src/interface.c:1442 msgid "Mon" msgstr "Mon" #: src/interface.c:520 src/interface.c:662 src/interface.c:804 #: src/interface.c:946 src/interface.c:1029 src/interface.c:1143 #: src/interface.c:1164 src/interface.c:1231 msgid "1" msgstr "1" #: src/interface.c:525 src/interface.c:667 src/interface.c:809 #: src/interface.c:951 src/interface.c:1039 src/interface.c:1097 #: src/interface.c:1173 src/interface.c:1240 msgid "2" msgstr "2" #: src/interface.c:535 msgid "Channel 1" msgstr "Kanal 1" #: src/interface.c:677 msgid "Channel 2" msgstr "Kanal 2" #: src/interface.c:819 msgid "Channel 3" msgstr "Kanal 3" #: src/interface.c:961 msgid "Channel 4" msgstr "Kanal 4" #: src/interface.c:1048 src/interface.c:1182 src/interface.c:1249 msgid "3" msgstr "3" #: src/interface.c:1057 src/interface.c:1116 src/interface.c:1192 #: src/interface.c:1258 msgid "4" msgstr "4" #: src/interface.c:1066 src/interface.c:1125 src/interface.c:1201 #: src/interface.c:1268 msgid "all" msgstr "alle" #: src/interface.c:1075 src/interface.c:1134 src/interface.c:1210 #: src/interface.c:1277 msgid "mute" msgstr "stumm" #: src/interface.c:1107 msgid " 3" msgstr " 3" #: src/interface.c:1317 msgid "Aux 1" msgstr "Aux 1" #: src/interface.c:1392 msgid "Aux 2" msgstr "Aux 2" #: src/support.c:90 src/support.c:114 #, c-format msgid "Couldn't find pixmap file: %s" msgstr "Pixmap-Datei konnte nicht gefunden werden: %s" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: jackeq Source-Version: 0.4.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jackeq, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jackeq_0.4.1-3.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jackeq/jackeq_0.4.1-3.debian.tar.gz jackeq_0.4.1-3.dsc to main/j/jackeq/jackeq_0.4.1-3.dsc jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.deb to main/j/jackeq/jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 583...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alessio Treglia (supplier of updated jackeq package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:26:33 +0100 Source: jackeq Binary: jackeq Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.4.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Changed-By: Aless
jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: jackeq_0.4.1-3.debian.tar.gz to main/j/jackeq/jackeq_0.4.1-3.debian.tar.gz jackeq_0.4.1-3.dsc to main/j/jackeq/jackeq_0.4.1-3.dsc jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.deb to main/j/jackeq/jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: jackeq_0.4.1-3.dsc - source sound jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 583923 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.changes
jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jackeq_0.4.1-3.dsc jackeq_0.4.1-3.debian.tar.gz jackeq_0.4.1-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: next, two small, weird-ish packages: puredata-import and pd-libdir
On Oct 30, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Oct 28, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Hey all, So the plan for puredata-dev has been pushed off until Pure Data 0.43 is released and packaged, so I think that the approach used in these two packages is going to be necessary for the timebeing. Can anyone upload these two? They are needed as deps for the rest of the packages that I have ITP'ed. Why did you put the DMUA field before starting your DM application? I will upload them, although with the field removed until you get your DM status approved. I actually have started my DM application before debconf10. The DebConf people that I worked with said I should get someone who knows the stuff that I package to sponsor my DM application. None of the debconf nyc localteam do any multimedia stuff. So at this point, once I find someone willing to sponsor me, I can revive my DM application email and complete the process. Sorry if I caused any trouble, I was just trying to make things go smoother. It's not trouble, just standard practice to put the flag after the DM status is attained. Unfortunately, I cannot in good conscience advocate your DM application until I have further worked with you. Maybe after a few more package uploads ;). Perfect, I have about 10 that are ready to upload! :-) And another question, why does puredata-import depends on puredata (<< 0.43)? I just uploaded pd-libdir for now. Thanks for uploading pd-libdir! puredata 0.43 has changed the way the headers are installed, so pd libraries that rely on certain headers will have to change once 0.43 hits the repos. I think its important to get this stuff into Debian working with 0.42, and I'm willing to do the legwork of packaging first for pd 0.42, then updating for 0.43. I understand the need for the build-depends, which is what I read from your description above (pd-libdir has the same restriction). However, puredata-import (the binary package) Depends on puredata << 0.43. Is that intended? If so, please explain why. Depends: puredata (< 0.43) is a mistake, I think, now that I look at it. I'll change it and push the changes once I get the chance. But feel free to make the change if you beat me to it. Also, while we are on it, why the naming scheme change? Shouldn't it be pd-import? So there are multiple flavors of 'pd' but only one is currently packaged (puredata). I am in the process of packaging the other major flavor, Pd-extended as pdextended and that package will also provide 'pd'. Pd-extended/pdextended has "import" built-in, so it doesn't need the "import" from the package. Therefore puredata-import is targeted to only 'puredata' not anything that that provides 'pd'. .hc There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: SuperCollider package
2010/10/31 Felipe Sateler : > Артём, you are CCed because I don't know if you are subscribed to the list. > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:09, Dan S wrote: >> >> 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : >> > Hi all, (Dan CCed because I'm not sure if you are subscribed to the list) >> > >> > I managed to take a few minutes to take a look at the package and it is >> > not in a very good shape (it was still using simple-patchsys!). I have >> > worked a bit on it, but it still has a long way to go. I will try to >> > work on it during this week, I think I can find one hour or two. >> > >> > Dan, as you are part of upstream, could you comment on the patches >> > included in the packaging? I can see they are in upstream svn ubuntu >> > packaging module, with yourself as last commiter on most of them. They >> > are older than the latest sc release, though. >> >> Hi - sorry for slow reply, I missed this thread. Most of the patches >> are by other people but I will try to comment: >> >> 02_disable_elisp_compilation.diff >> - not sure I'm afraid, it's connected with the emacs sc3 mode, which >> I don't use. Looks like it might disable something from running simply >> because the build machine isn't the target machine. >> >> 03_fix_elisp_install_path.diff >> - another emacs mode thing, not sure. > > Does anyone use emacs and can comment on wether this should be applied > upstream? The patch changes the elisp install path from > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/supercollider > >> >> 06_deb_scvim.diff >> - build machine != target machine so don't error out if no ruby executable >> >> 07_deb_sced.diff >> - build machine != target machine so don't modify machine's mime database > > Dan, can you comment on whether these can be upstreamed? I don't see > why they should be debian-specific. Right, that makes sense. I've had a look at the scons scripts and not been able to integrate them in neatly (was hoping to add a nice option for not-installing-here - if anyone has the scons chops to suggest something then please do, I'd be grateful.) FYI, supercollider 3.4.1 (bugfix release) has just been agreed, so is likely to come out very very soon without any further upstreaming. I hope that doesn't get in the way of debianising... would these patches be considered blocking issues, do you think? Dan >> 08_deb_scvim_checkactive.diff >> - the 'scvim' script is a wrapper which launches vim with the sc3 >> plugin. debian vim-addons policy requires the plugin not to be >> auto-enabled when installing, so we must modify the scvim script to >> detect if the addon is not enabled, and to help the user enable it if >> they want to. (Needs to be a patch since vim-addon-manager not >> necessarily used on all linuxes) > > This one has been upstreamed, great! > >> >> 10_fix_rpath.diff >> - I'm not clear on why the change from -rpath to -rpath-link has to >> be done here as a patch. cc'ing this message to Артём who may be able >> to comment on this, and possibly others. > > This looks like it could be upstreamed too? > > > > > -- > > Saludos, > Felipe Sateler > > ___ > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers > ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 03:58:06PM EDT, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Luke Yelavich > wrote: > > Ok, I have uploaded initial packaging to the repo, adjusted for Debian, > > based on the Ubuntu packaging. Feel free to go ahead and pick holes in it. > > :) > > I don't see you name in the Uploaders list, can I add it? Sure. Luke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Luke Yelavich wrote: > Ok, I have uploaded initial packaging to the repo, adjusted for Debian, based > on the Ubuntu packaging. Feel free to go ahead and pick holes in it. :) I don't see you name in the Uploaders list, can I add it? -- Alessio Treglia Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 11:33:03AM EDT, Luke Yelavich wrote: > Hi all > I am preparing to get rtkit into debian and the pkg-multimedia git repo. Ok, I have uploaded initial packaging to the repo, adjusted for Debian, based on the Ubuntu packaging. Feel free to go ahead and pick holes in it. :) Luke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:18:21PM EDT, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Have you looked at our wiki and didn't find this piece of information? > If yes, could you perhaps add/link/... this information at the place > where you would have expected it? I remember fiding the appropriate wiki page a while back, and didn't bookmark it, and couldn't remember where it was. :) Thanks to other devs, I have he link. Luke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 601238 sid squeeze fixed-in-experimental
Bug #601238 {Done: Alessio Treglia } [earcandy] earcandy:
exits on removal of a sound source
Added tag(s) squeeze, sid, and fixed-in-experimental.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
601238: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601238
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#601238: marked as done (earcandy: exits on removal of a sound source)
Your message dated Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:32:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#601238: fixed in earcandy 0.9+bzr12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601238,
regarding earcandy: exits on removal of a sound source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
601238: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601238
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: earcandy
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: important
Hi
using the earcandy from unstable (you really ought to get a new version
uploaded, upstream has released 0.9), earcandy exits itself as soon as
you remove a sound source. Like if i hit pause on mpd, or if a
notification is played and done -> earcandy exits.
Not exactly the goal of this tool
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages earcandy depends on:
ii pulseaudio 0.9.21-3+b1 PulseAudio sound server
ii python 2.6.6-3 interactive high-level object-orie
ii python-dbus 0.83.1-1simple interprocess messaging syst
ii python-glade22.17.0-2GTK+ bindings: Glade support
ii python-notify0.1.1-2+b2 Python bindings for libnotify
ii python-support 1.0.7 automated rebuilding support for P
ii python-wnck 2.30.0-3Python bindings for the WNCK libra
earcandy recommends no packages.
earcandy suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
bye, Joerg
Shut-up brain or I’ll stab you with a Q-Tip.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: earcandy
Source-Version: 0.9+bzr12-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
earcandy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.debian.tar.gz
earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc
to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc
earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_all.deb
to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_all.deb
earcandy_0.9+bzr12.orig.tar.gz
to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 601...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alessio Treglia (supplier of updated earcandy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:15:39 +0100
Source: earcandy
Binary: earcandy
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9+bzr12-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Changed-By: Alessio Treglia
Description:
earcandy - Sound level manager for PulseAudio
Closes: 601238
Changes:
earcandy (0.9+bzr12-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
[ Fladischer Michael ]
* debian/rules: Use default path and remove empty directories.
* debian/links: removed as it is no longer required because setup.py
will
* debian/copyright: Change format to DEP-5.
* debian/control: Bump to standards version 3.9.1.
.
[ Alessio Treglia ]
* New upstream release:
- Exits on removal of a sound sorce, fixed (Closes: #601238).
* Update copyright information. Fix all license-related issues.
* debian/control:
- Depends on python-{gobject,gtk2,gconf}.
* debian/patches/01-desktop_file_parsing.patch:
- Fixed parsing of commands separated by semicolon from desktop files.
* debian/gbp.conf: Add sign-tags.
Checksums-Sha1:
f67e81fbeb8ba80e440b6ac7ccceb8b07eff0fc3 1451 earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc
2cf7a3f9874bd794a247d043a85285843c7c94c1 59385 earcandy_0.9+bzr12.orig.tar.gz
a258b21a813f075fdba67795b71ab62a5e38a734 5589
earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.debian.tar.gz
ccc05cdf14faec68beda78c51ff1930a85125a5a 52338 earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
48df2d6516c26a39abf3747deb82be2609d4b4ec80e7e0d48b26c8ca84c3a587 1451
earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc
a2c824a0822c4ba0baac23021cc4e06d7a6c9b72434b85704ef8f95d79e7312d 59385
earcandy_0.9+bzr12.orig.tar.gz
64
earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.debian.tar.gz to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.debian.tar.gz earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_all.deb to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_all.deb earcandy_0.9+bzr12.orig.tar.gz to main/e/earcandy/earcandy_0.9+bzr12.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc - source sound earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 601238 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_amd64.changes
earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.dsc earcandy_0.9+bzr12.orig.tar.gz earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1.debian.tar.gz earcandy_0.9+bzr12-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Di, Nov 02, 2010 at 16:33:03 (CET), Luke Yelavich wrote: > Hi all I am preparing to get rtkit into debian and the pkg-multimedia > git repo. Is there any document that someone could point me to as to > what to do to set up a new git repo for pkg-multimedia maintenance? Just > about have everything to go locally, just need to push it. There is a script /git/pkg-multimedia/setup-repository on git.debian.org, which creates a new repository and enables the appropriate commit hooks. I usually first setup the repository, clone from it, do my work and then push back to git.debian.org. Have you looked at our wiki and didn't find this piece of information? If yes, could you perhaps add/link/... this information at the place where you would have expected it? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#602216: ITP: libprolooks -- GTK+ widgets for audio applications
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: libprolooks Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Hans Baier * URL : http://www.hansfbaier.de/wordpress/libprolooks/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Vala Description : GTK+ widgets designed for audio applications libprolooks is a GTK+ and Cairo-based widget library suitable for audio applications. It includes and consolidates widgets from the Calf plugin project. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On 11/02/10 16:54, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users RT-priviledge. It is not specific to an -rt kernel. Exactly. It's more or less a replacement of the PAM stuff we did in jackd (/etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf). AFAIK, rtkit is being integrated into systemd, but I might be mistaken on this one. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, rosea.grammostola wrote: RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users RT-priviledge. It is not specific to an -rt kernel. RT via pulseaudio? Hmm ok. No, RT via DBUS. It's not directly related to pulseaudio, but it was created to solve some of PA's problems -- and was created by PA developers (specifically Poettering). -gabriel ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On 11/02/2010 04:54 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, rosea.grammostola wrote: Uh, rtkit? Is that something else then Rtirq http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/107 Yes, it is something else. RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users RT-priviledge. It is not specific to an -rt kernel. RTIRQ, on the other hand, is a way to prioritize IRQ handling on an -rt patched kernel. RT via pulseaudio? Hmm ok. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, rosea.grammostola wrote: Uh, rtkit? Is that something else then Rtirq http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/107 Yes, it is something else. RtKit is pulseaudio's solution to giving normal users RT-priviledge. It is not specific to an -rt kernel. RTIRQ, on the other hand, is a way to prioritize IRQ handling on an -rt patched kernel. -gabriel ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 11:50:26AM EDT, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Luke Yelavich > wrote: > > Hi all > > I am preparing to get rtkit into debian and the pkg-multimedia git repo. Is > > there any document that someone could point me to as to what to do to set > > up a new git repo for pkg-multimedia maintenance? Just about have > > everything to go locally, just need to push it. > > Hi Luke! > > > Take a look: > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging#Howtohelpwithpackaging > > I've already set up an empty repo: > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/rtkit.git > > Feel free to add my name+email to the Uploaders field if you need a sponsor. Thanks very much, will hopefully get this populated by the end of the day (I am in the US currently). Luke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Luke Yelavich wrote: > Hi all > I am preparing to get rtkit into debian and the pkg-multimedia git repo. Is > there any document that someone could point me to as to what to do to set up > a new git repo for pkg-multimedia maintenance? Just about have everything to > go locally, just need to push it. Hi Luke! Take a look: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging#Howtohelpwithpackaging I've already set up an empty repo: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/rtkit.git Feel free to add my name+email to the Uploaders field if you need a sponsor. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On 11/02/2010 03:48 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote: On 11/02/2010 04:33 PM, Luke Yelavich wrote: Hi all I am preparing to get rtkit into debian and the pkg-multimedia git repo. Is there any document that someone could point me to as to what to do to set up a new git repo for pkg-multimedia maintenance? Just about have everything to go locally, just need to push it. Nice. Check: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging Good luck! Uh, rtkit? Is that something else then Rtirq http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/107 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
On 11/02/2010 04:33 PM, Luke Yelavich wrote: Hi all I am preparing to get rtkit into debian and the pkg-multimedia git repo. Is there any document that someone could point me to as to what to do to set up a new git repo for pkg-multimedia maintenance? Just about have everything to go locally, just need to push it. Nice. Check: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging Good luck! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Rtkit in pkg-multimedia.
Hi all I am preparing to get rtkit into debian and the pkg-multimedia git repo. Is there any document that someone could point me to as to what to do to set up a new git repo for pkg-multimedia maintenance? Just about have everything to go locally, just need to push it. Luke ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
autotalent_0.2-1_amd64.changes is NEW
(new) autotalent_0.2-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound (new) autotalent_0.2-1.dsc optional sound (new) autotalent_0.2-1_amd64.deb optional sound pith correction LADSPA plugin Autotalent is a real-time pitch correction plugin. Users can specify the notes that a singer is allowed to hit, and Autotalent makes sure that they do. Autotalent may be used for more exotic effects, like the Cher / T-Pain effect, making your voice sound like a chiptune, adding artificial vibrato, or messing with your formants. Autotalent can also be used as a harmonizer that knows how to sing in the scale with you. Or, you can use Autotalent to change the scale of a melody between major and minor or to change the musical mode. . Autotalent was designed from the ground up to process musical melodies, whether sung by voice or played on some kind of instrument. As long as one gives it a monophonic source (i.e. a melody in a single, 1-channel track), he can usually expects pretty good results. So this means that if you're in the business of processing vocal harmonies, you should apply it to each monophonic vocal part separately. If in the spirit of experimentation you're daring enough to try tuning or pitch shifting an entire chord using one instance of the plugin (again not what it's meant for), you'll hear gritty nastiness. (new) autotalent_0.2.orig.tar.gz optional sound Changes: autotalent (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. (Closes: #600730) Override entries for your package: Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 600730 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of autotalent_0.2-1_amd64.changes
autotalent_0.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: autotalent_0.2-1.dsc autotalent_0.2.orig.tar.gz autotalent_0.2-1.debian.tar.gz autotalent_0.2-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
autotalent_0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
As requested by Maintainer === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] zita-at1 packaging annotated tag, upstream/0.1.1, created. upstream/0.1.1
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:48 AM, wrote: > The annotated tag, upstream/0.1.1 has been created > at 92c979ab6941cec3f35a8b2fbb193b77e5665035 (tag) > tagging bfa6af6384c5c6e9101640e0293bfb4de8314a46 (commit) > tagged by Alessio Treglia Once the FTP-masters has accepted zita-resampler, I'll go on reviewing this. -- Alessio Treglia Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
mididings_0~20100602-1_amd64.changes is NEW
(new) mididings-doc_0~20100602-1_all.deb optional doc mididings Documentation mididings is a MIDI router and processor based on Python, supporting ALSA and JACK MIDI. . This package contains the documentation files for mididings. (new) mididings_0~20100602-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound (new) mididings_0~20100602-1.dsc optional sound (new) mididings_0~20100602-1_all.deb optional sound MIDI router and processor based on Python mididings is a MIDI router and processor based on Python, supporting ALSA and JACK MIDI. . This package contains the mididings and livedings applications. (new) mididings_0~20100602.orig.tar.gz optional sound (new) python-mididings_0~20100602-1_amd64.deb optional python MIDI routing library for Python mididings is a MIDI router and processor based on Python, supporting ALSA and JACK MIDI. . Features: * MIDI routing and filtering Filter events depending on their event type, channel, note number, velocity, etc., and freely route them between an arbitrary number of input and output ports. * Modifying and converting MIDI events Transpose notes, apply velocity curves, change controller values and ranges, or convert events to any other MIDI event type. mididings also includes more complex functions like a diatonic harmonizer, floating split points, latched notes, and more. * Seamless switching between patches Set up different "scenes", each with its own MIDI routing and processing, and switch between them at any time, even while playing. Switching scenes does not affect notes already held, and does not result in dropouts or stuck notes! * MIDI event monitoring, running external commands Print MIDI event data to the console to help debugging your patches and configuring your MIDI controllers. In addition to its MIDI output, mididings can also execute shell commands and send OSC or DBUS messages. Changes: mididings (0~20100602-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. (Closes: #600914) Override entries for your package: Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 600914 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of mididings_0~20100602-1_amd64.changes
mididings_0~20100602-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mididings_0~20100602-1.dsc mididings_0~20100602.orig.tar.gz mididings_0~20100602-1.debian.tar.gz python-mididings_0~20100602-1_amd64.deb mididings_0~20100602-1_all.deb mididings-doc_0~20100602-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
