horgand 1.14-4 MIGRATED to testing

2011-03-18 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the horgand source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.14-3
  Current version:  1.14-4

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


toonloop 2.0.6-1 MIGRATED to testing

2011-03-18 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the toonloop source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.0.4-1
  Current version:  2.0.6-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


idjc 0.8.4-4 MIGRATED to testing

2011-03-18 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the idjc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.8.4-3
  Current version:  0.8.4-4

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Hobby Pesca Fishing Club

2011-03-18 Thread Hobby Pesca Fishing
Nuova pagina 1Finalmente a Napoli in collaborazione con la società Hobby Pesca 
, nasce la prima scuola di pesca con sede in Marano di Napoli.

Nel corso degli ultimi 10 anni la disciplina della pesca sportiva ha raccolto e 
riunito consensi in tutta Italia in modo così elevato da arrivare ad essere una 
delle attività sociali più praticate della popolazione anche giovanile nelle 
giornate dedicate al tempo libero
leggi l'articolo completo->
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: ffmpeg-4:0.6.1-5 and jack support

2011-03-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 13:47:16 (CET), Dragan Noveski wrote:

> i am an aptosid user and using the ffmpeg-4:0.6.1-5 on my system.
> if i am looking right, this version is compiled w/out jack support.
> is there any special reason, or has the jack support just been forgotten
> while preparing the package?
> if there is any chance to include jack support in ffmpeg i would be more
> than happy.

please file a wishlist report against libavdevice52.

I think there is no problem with that, just that nobody was able to test
avdevice's jack output support.

> anyway, thanks for your work and maintaining all this complicated stuff!

Thanks! :-)

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


ffmpeg-4:0.6.1-5 and jack support

2011-03-18 Thread Dragan Noveski

hallo,

i am an aptosid user and using the ffmpeg-4:0.6.1-5 on my system.
if i am looking right, this version is compiled w/out jack support.
is there any special reason, or has the jack support just been forgotten 
while preparing the package?
if there is any chance to include jack support in ffmpeg i would be more 
than happy.


anyway, thanks for your work and maintaining all this complicated stuff!

cheers.
doc

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-03-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4.debian.tar.gz
  to main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4.debian.tar.gz
fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4.dsc
  to main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4.dsc
fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4_amd64.deb
  to main/f/fluidsynth-dssi/fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4_amd64.deb


Override entries for your package:
fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4.dsc - source sound
fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4_amd64.deb - optional sound

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Processing of fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4_amd64.changes

2011-03-18 Thread Debian FTP Masters
fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4.dsc
  fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4.debian.tar.gz
  fluidsynth-dssi_1.0.0-4_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#618759: hydrogen-drumkits: several years newer update material

2011-03-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: hydrogen-drumkits
Version: 0.9.3.20070703-3
Severity: minor

Upstream has newer material than this more than 3 years old packaging:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/hydrogen/files/Sound%20Libraries/Main%20sound%20libraries/

Please consider upgrading.

I dare raise severity from wishlist to minor due to the excess of
stalement.

Also, instead of the list of hardcoded ressources to fetch, it probably
is sensible to instead make use of this upstream provided
machine-parsable listing:
http://www.hydrogen-music.org/feeds/drumkit_list.php


 - Jonas



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Dbus-c++ Debian package maintainership.

2011-03-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:19:50AM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:29:35PM +1100, Luke Yelavich wrote:
If the team decides to not maintain this package, then we need to 
either make sure the package gets a maintainer in Debian from 
somewhere, or, we talk to Upstream about alternative solutions. I 
understand and accept in advance any reasons given to not take over 
maintainership of dbus-c++.


Let me add the following statement from ffado-devel to the discussion:

  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26942187

---
maybe the unbundling of dbus-c++ was premature.  Upstream appear not to 
do any releases nor do they seem to have arrived at a stable API yet. 
And downstreams have source incompatible versions of it or don't have 
it at all.

---

If we arrive at the conclusion that dbus-c++ is unmaintainable, I'm 
happy to re-add the embedded dbus-c++ bits upstream. Though I have 
commit rights, we could also do it locally with a quilt patch.


The very fact of one other package using the same library is to me proof 
that we (Debian) should maintain dbus-c++ as a separate package despite 
upstreams possibly feeling it relevant to ship it internally.


I would certainly hope that upstreams, if internalizing, does so without 
a) making it difficult to instead link against a system shared library 
or b) forking it by making local hacks to local copy of dbus-c++ code.



I find it inappropriate for this team to maintain dbus-c++ - it is not 
specific to Multimedia.


I would be happy to join forces with you, Luke, on maintaining dbus-c++ 
at the collab-maint area or in some other team more appropriate for 
this.  I won't call it "sponsoring" as that is easily associated with 
"you are responsible, I am your mentor" which might (or might not) be 
the initial situation but should not the atmosphere we are aiming at - 
neither here in the Debian Multimedia team nor in another team formed 
for the maintainance of dbus-c++.


As you may have noticed from earlier conversations here on the list, I 
do have some strong principles in the way I handle packages: I use CDBS, 
not short-form dh.  You need not be fluent in CDBS due to this - I am ok 
with either guiding you or taking care of the parts directly tied to 
juggling CDBS, but if you for some reason have _opposite_ principles 
then obviously you are better off teaming up with someone else :-)



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Partnership.

2011-03-18 Thread Ekkehard Schubert


Good day,

I am Mr. C.Y. Ling, alternate CEO of the operations of CITIC Bank
International, China. I have a proposal for you in the tune of One Hundred
& Five Million EUR, after successful transfer, we shall share in the ratio
of forty for you and sixty for me. Please reply for specifics.

Yours,
Mr. C.Y. Ling.


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Dbus-c++ Debian package maintainership.

2011-03-18 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:29:35PM +1100, Luke Yelavich wrote:

> Greetings all.

Hi!

> If the team decides to not maintain this package, then we need to
> either make sure the package gets a maintainer in Debian from
> somewhere, or, we talk to Upstream about alternative solutions. I
> understand and accept in advance any reasons given to not take over
> maintainership of dbus-c++.

Let me add the following statement from ffado-devel to the discussion:

   http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26942187

---
maybe the unbundling of dbus-c++ was premature.  Upstream appear not to
do any releases nor do they seem to have arrived at a stable API yet.
And downstreams have source incompatible versions of it or don't have it
at all.
---

If we arrive at the conclusion that dbus-c++ is unmaintainable, I'm happy
to re-add the embedded dbus-c++ bits upstream. Though I have commit
rights, we could also do it locally with a quilt patch.


Just my €0.02


Cheers

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers