eed for you to do anything, since SSE already gets enabled
> only where it's supported (in the upstream version currently in git).
Debian is supposed to support i486 computers. What happens if caps
detects SSE in the buildd? i386 binaries should not have such
optimizations by default.
--
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Felipe Sateler (2013-08-28 23:31:57)
>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >
>> > Quoting Felipe Sateler (2013-08-26 00:09:49)
>> > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at
nternal () from /usr/lib/liblo.so.7
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xf7eed3ec in lo_arg_pp_internal () from /usr/lib/liblo.so.7
> #1 0x000d in ?? ()
> #2 0x000d in ?? ()
>
> So this makes me believe that liblo is broken on sparc and hence I'm
> reassigning this bug to liblo.
&
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi liblo devs,
>
> The python liblo wrapper has a test suite that has uncovered a bug in
> liblo.
I just tried current git (5a7a54b4a0a) and the test provided by
Sebastian continues to fail:
Program received signal SIGBU
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Hi liblo devs,
>>
>> The python liblo wrapper has a test suite that has uncovered a bug in
>> liblo.
>
> I just tried current git (5a7a54b4a0a) and
environments?).
Possibly radium could default to /usr/lib/ladspa if LADSPA_PATH is not set.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>> Hi liblo devs,
>>>>
ke there aren't any other specific
rdpends, so it should be enough with that.
>
> It would have been nice if the caps package had a Debian.NEWS entry about this
> (at the very least) though, along with all the other renames.
True
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
would certainly welcome Tim to join us at the team!
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Bart Brouns wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 11:43 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Hi Bart, any reason you dropped the CC:s? If no reason in particular,
>> please CC the list and bug report.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Bart Broun
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.6.3~repack-2
Severity: normal
Debian now has yaml-cpp, so supercollider should use it. Unfortunately,
sc requires yaml 0.3, so some porting seems to be required.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstab
ll_headers ../../*hpp)
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> In all archs except i386 and amd64 :(
>
> So far I have the following that works,
Hmm, turns out it doesn't. sclang needs atomic too.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimed
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:18 AM,
wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit 5f4d0fb4ce4b15fac4c78bbc871f94ba9fbd9fb8
> Author: Dan Stowell
> Date: Thu Sep 12 19:42:16 2013 +0100
>
> Use system libyaml-cpp0.3 (fixes #722430)
libyaml-cpp0.3 is bound to go a
cpp0.3 available everywhere.
In debian, the 0.3 package is built from the same sources, so it is
bound to go away at some point. The headers also do not match the 0.3
version. I tried building using system yaml-cpp but it failed.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
__
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Dan S wrote:
> 2013/9/13 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Dan S wrote:
>>> Ah, that's useful. Actually, though, I don't believe porting is
>>> required. The yaml-cpp website says that the old 0.3 API &q
s
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
Uploaded.
What is the intended upgrade path from ardour2? So far one would have
to manually install ardour3 (good thing they are coinstallable). At
some point ardour3 should probably replace ardour?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia
gt;
>> >Did you noticed any other issue with copyright file?
>>
>> I don't recall any, but I usually stop processing when I find an error :)
>
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> copyright file fixed.
>
> Can you review and upload again please?
Sorry for t
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, wrote:
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit ae11cc02389f29f0e7c3545f35606a113ce68d60
> Author: Felipe Sateler
> Date: Tue Sep 24 11:33:11 2013 -0300
>
> Pass env variables to waf
For some reason this
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2013/9/24 Felipe Sateler
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM,
>> wrote:
>> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>> > commit ae11cc02389f29f0e7c3545f35606a113ce68d60
>&g
relevance...
Unfortunately, the difference is that waf.mk sets LINKFLAGS. But
LDFLAGS works and is (as noted in the page linked by Jaromír) the
correct variable to specify. I suspect LINKFLAGS was used in older waf
(as scons does, I believe they share some ancestry).
--
Saludos,
Felipe
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Felipe Sateler (2013-09-24 23:22:09)
>> We should also disable the optimizations and enable them manually (it
>> is now ftbs everywhere). We need to set the --dist-target argument to
>> configure appropria
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2013/9/24 Felipe Sateler
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Jaromír Mikeš
>> wrote:
>> > 2013/9/24 Felipe Sateler
>> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM,
>> >> >
>> >
;
[2]
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2013-September/034475.html
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Thomas Nagy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Nagy wrote:
>> > Waf by default does accept CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS, and in all versions.
&
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Dan S wrote:
> 2013/9/11 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> In all archs except i386 and amd64 :(
>>>
>>> So far I have the following that works,
>>
>> Hmm, turns out it
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On 09/22/13 00:19, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> [something about ardour3]
>
> I've fixed the FTBFS and added the bug numbers to the changelog.
>
> Is there anything left that prevents us from another upload?
Not that
On 5 August 2016 at 18:15, James Cowgill wrote:
> On 05/08/16 22:47, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 5 August 2016 at 17:24, James Cowgill wrote:
>>> On 05/08/16 21:03, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>>> Hi Sebastian,
>>>>
>>>> I did a fresh b
ase be sure to read
the wiki[1] for some details on how most packages are managed in the
team.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintaine
them?
> How to confirm they are really fixed?
The reports have files that should reproduce the issues. I think it is
best to forward these issues upstream. Sometimes the fix to these
issues is not trivial.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-mult
o allowing easier workflows for eg, rebasing on
new upstream versions, this nicely sidesteps the issue of the .pc dir.
Paired with the use of export-dir, this results in the .pc dir never
existing in my local worktree.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On 25 August 2016 at 11:50, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2016-08-25 15:03 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler :
>> On 25 August 2016 at 09:39, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have a plenty of these warnings in eq10q package :(
>>>
>>> W: eq10q-dbgs
ng /usr/lib/libcsound64.a
>> Project ERROR: A valid csound library was not found.
>> /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/qmake.mk:45: recipe for target 'Makefile' failed
>> make: *** [Makefile] Error 3
Turns out the latest csound upload somehow is missing the dev s
-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> csoundqt fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
Thanks for reporting! This bug is actually in src:csound, and was
filed a few days ago. I'm merging the bugs.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
_
On 4 November 2016 at 11:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> 2016-11-04 15:50 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler :
>> On 4 November 2016 at 11:21, Balint Reczey wrote:
>>> Source: kodi
>>> Version: 17.0~beta5+dfsg1-1
>>> Severity: grave
>>>
>
an extra package is installed
2. Should a bug occur in the autodetection code, or on the depended
package, the feature will be silently disabled instead of failing the
build.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
uploaded to unstable before the hard freeze.
Thanks!
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia
> state (from yesterday)
> and new upstream releases are not accepted :(
It is my understanding that new versions can still be uploaded. New
packages are not acceptable anymore.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
teracting apps misbehave?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
On 11 January 2017 at 04:59, Bogdan Vatra wrote:
> On miercuri, 11 ianuarie 2017 09:48:16 EET Bogdan Vatra wrote:
>> On marți, 10 ianuarie 2017 17:20:28 EET Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 10 Januar
On 11 January 2017 at 12:37, Bogdan Vatra wrote:
> On miercuri, 11 ianuarie 2017 10:12:00 EET Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>>
>> On 11 January 2017 at 04:59, Bogdan Vatra wrote:
>> > On miercuri, 11 ianuarie 2017 09:48:16 EE
On 11 January 2017 at 13:05, Bogdan Vatra wrote:
> On miercuri, 11 ianuarie 2017 12:40:23 EET Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 11 January 2017 at 12:37, Bogdan Vatra wrote:
>> > On miercuri, 11 ianuarie 2017 10:12:00 EET Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> >> Control: t
ages into squeeze-backports, and maybe others might be
> enthusiastic about this as well.
FYI, there's already a draft at the usual
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom page.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-mai
ploaded.
Hans, please fix the dependencies on pd and explicitly state the
preferred provider (on this and the other pd-* packages).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 22:38, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 16:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is one more package with the same "fatal erro
hould be disabled by default and
enabled when needed. They provide zero value for most. Those who need
it can build the static libraries themselves. And they probably
will/should anyways, since static libs will probably be used in some
rare context.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
people with unsupported old cruft in their system will
continue to have a working system, and it may even enable them to
remove said old cruft from the system.
Jonas, why do you claim it is not a tiny change? In this case it is a
1 line patch that requires no maintainance.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sate
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-08-12 at 01:27pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > > If you cannot live with others applying such tiny changes to your
>> > > pet packages, you sh
Can we fetch sced3 from upstream's git repository?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multi
What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:25, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:35:30PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed?
>
> ecasound replaces ecasound2.2, so yes, ecasound2.2 should be removed (I
> don't know ho
ot;
> fi
> cat <<-EOF
> - Subject: ${EMAILPREFIX}$repo/$short_refname: $describe
> + Subject: ${EMAILPREFIX}$subjectdesc $refname_type, $short_refname,
> ${change_type}d. $describe
This and the above are to send more meaningful subje
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 16:17, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Do we want to care? If so, could somebody take the required actions?
Seems like for some reason non ascii characters go mangled up. Don't
know what to do about it, though. I'll try to inspect that when I get
time.
-
27;m sorry I can't check right now (otherwise I'd check and change it
myself, but lest this be forgotten), but did you also modify the repo
setup script to add this too? So that new repositories get the right
hook by default.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
_
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 03:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mi, Okt 05, 2011 at 23:38:00 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:48, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've update (most) pkg-multimedia post-receiv
g.
This looks fishy. You might want to ask on debian-release.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ipt into the current debian
packaging or do we need to wait for the next upstream release?
Otherwise, I'm just going to disable the gedit plugin package for the
time being.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:02, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 17.10.2011 00:51, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> Dan, I'm CCing you to try to get your attention.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 18:59, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>> Can we fetch sced3 from upstr
we ignore it? If it is a valid
copyright claim, can we redistribute these datasets?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailma
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:49, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on updating csound's copyright file, and I have a case I
> did not handle before. Csound ships four datafiles which are the
> result of a Discrete Fourier Transform of data (impulse responses)
iptions of licenses.
Also, I believe licenses should be either on a separate paragraph or
written in the file paragraph but not both.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.or
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 17:51, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Hi Felipe
>
> Thanks for your remarks.
>
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 23:18 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:52, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> > I uploaded the pd-flite package to git.debian.org
e build dependency should be
puredata-dev | puredata (<< 0.43), since puredata >= 0.43 is not
enough to build.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 19:16, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 21:33 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 17:51, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
>> > I wasn't able to verify that but it certainly doesn't hurt. I replaced
>> > the spac
oes not
> guarantee puredata-dev?
Sorry I haven't answered, I've been very busy.
It seems to me that the dependency of puredata on puredata-dev should
be transitory (there is no reason to need the -dev package in a user
system). Therefore
s to fulfill their
> jobs.
Actually, that is a problem with scons. SCons doesn't distinguish
between 'configure' and 'build', so it performs all tests whenever
invoked. One can try to hack around this like with Dan's patch, but in
the general
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:49, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2011-11-15 15:34, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> Sorry I haven't answered, I've been very busy.
>
> aye.
> sorry for perstering then.
>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 07:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2011-11-21 03:26, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:49, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>
>>> right, makes sense.
>>> i a
hread, the autotools stuff need not be
documented in the copyright file, and is just unnecessary noise.
BTW, I still find it weird that we need to issue weird commands in pd
to load distro-provided externals. Can someone please explain to me
the rationale for such a requirement?
--
Sal
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 21:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-11-29 at 08:00pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> As discussed in another thread, the autotools stuff need not be
>> documented in the copyright file, and is just unnecessary noise.
>
> Sorry for not paying attentio
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 00:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-11-21 at 11:25am, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> On 2011-11-21 03:26, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > Looks like there is a strange thing with the install-sh section in
>> > debian/copyright. The license name c
undistributable).
[1] More correctly, debian's approach to complying is putting the
stuff in the copyright file.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 16:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-12-01 at 03:56pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >> > I sure prefer if you are not lazy but instead respectful to those
>> >> > develo
iledges for it. Its all ready for upload, hopefully someone can
> upload it in the next day or two so it makes it into testing in time.
>
Uploaded.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintaine
ed an idea,
> which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
> himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
> of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. -
> Thomas Jefferson
>
>
>
> __
tion
>
>
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
7;t. Unfortunately, you have to create yet another account.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
changes in both
versions. There is an embedded copy of the mpadec library (not really
used anywhere else, apparently), which needs checking. Also, there may
be new opcodes and whatnot. Any help will be appreciated.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multime
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 15:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been able
>> to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the package
>> is wor
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 17:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-01-19 at 07:06pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been
>> > able to finish up the new upst
e in the library, then the ABI would
be broken. Is this the case?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
vior you
describe was true...
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:12, Dan S wrote:
> 2012/1/22 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:00, Dan S wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> SuperCollider just released bugfix release 3.4.5. I've imported it
>>> into the debian-mu
f
>
> - use adduser --system rtaudio in jackd-common's postinst scripts
>
> - maybe ask the user about adding user IDs to this new group
>
>
> Do we have to coordinate with debian-devel about the group name?
I think we should. There are probably other applications that need
sing the cpu does to
follow branches can be very relevant too. Code compactness is also
important due to cache hits/misses. So I think the only way to tell if
an optimization really is beneficial is via benchmarking.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
maintaining nginx packages.
>
> I'm familiar with the BTS, I would be pleased to contribute to this project
> and help on packages/issues.
>
> Looking forward to work with you.
Hi,
Please apply via the alioth web interface so that we can grant you privileges.
--
Saludos,
Fel
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:30, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:26, Cyril LAVIER
> wrote:
>> Hi pkg-multimedia members.
>>
>> I'm Cyril Lavier, a 25 years old system administrator from France.
>>
>> I would like to join the team to c
wed in this repository
>
> Could someone with more git-fu help me delete it?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2196874/cannot-delete-remote-branch-in-git
The update hook should be the culprit
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-mainta
h do).
I'll edit this thing a bit now (mostly cosmetic changes).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:15, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I've been reviewing the Bits, and have a comment:
>
> The lash->ladish change is confusing. The part about a patch being
> needed is unnecessary IMO. It should be replaced by a statement of
> wether jackd1 and jackd2
working with upstream to fix it. I hope to have the build system ready
soonish.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> If you do not want to be an admin, just grant yourself lowered
>> privileges in the team page. I surely hope we didn't decide everyone
>> was forced to be an admin. What we did decide is that anyone who wants
>> to be an admin, can be one (
edia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ve
> I have found a useful set of routines, which could be put into
> README.source.
I think the main issue is working with applied patches _and_ a
debian/patches dir... If one does not use --export-dir
git-buildpackage fails miserably.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 14:58, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 16:36:12 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>>>> Until we have a clear idea on how format 3.0 (quilt) should be used with
>>>> git-buildpackage, I'd suggest to revert this change.
>
Sorry for answering privately.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 22:20, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 02:48, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:28:25PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> I can't seem to update the repo. Is anyone else having
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 04:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 09:24:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for answering privately.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 22:20, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 02:
d.
Surely auto-updating debian/rules is insane? I think you are confusing
it with debian/control.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
501 - 600 of 1037 matches
Mail list logo
