On Do, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:33:35 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 10.12.2009 16:02, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:38 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> Rationale: switching to v3 at this point introduces even more
>>> inconsistency in our packaging and obviously our advocat
Am 10.12.2009 16:02, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:38 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Rationale: switching to v3 at this point introduces even more
inconsistency in our packaging and obviously our advocated tool
'git-buildpackage' doesn't cope with this new format properly yet.
Fabian Greffrath writes:
> Am 10.12.2009 17:10, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> I've readded quilt integration now. Next problem while trying to build:
>
> I am not sure if the order of arguments passed to the 'dh' command
> matters. Please try again with 'dh --with-quilt $@' and make sure that
> al
Am 10.12.2009 17:10, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I've readded quilt integration now. Next problem while trying to build:
I am not sure if the order of arguments passed to the 'dh' command
matters. Please try again with 'dh --with-quilt $@' and make sure that
all patches actually get applied.
Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> Please sponsor new revision of a52dec.
I've readded quilt integration now. Next problem while trying to build:
gcc -shared bitstream.lo imdct.lo bit_allocate.lo parse.lo downmix.lo
-lm -Wl,-soname -Wl,liba52.so.0 -o .libs/liba52.so.0.0.0
/usr/bin/ld: bitstream.lo: r
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:38 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Felipe Sateler writes:
>>
>> >> > Is this really the intended way? TBH, I have doubts, and would find it
>> >> > more natural if the patches would be applied to the debian branc
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 09:38 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Felipe Sateler writes:
>
> >> > Is this really the intended way? TBH, I have doubts, and would find it
> >> > more natural if the patches would be applied to the debian branch then,
> >> > as it would retain the invariant that a git che
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:38:59AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
[dpkg src fmt v3]
> While I am not opposed at all to the new format, and besides, I'm really
> looking forward using it, I don't think that our team is ready for it yet.
>
> what do you think?
ACK.
--
mail: a...@thur.de ht
Felipe Sateler writes:
>> > Is this really the intended way? TBH, I have doubts, and would find it
>> > more natural if the patches would be applied to the debian branch then,
>> > as it would retain the invariant that a git checkout produces a similar
>> > view of the source as a 'dpkg-source -x
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 07:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> 2009/12/10 Reinhard Tartler :
> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> >
> >> Hello DD's
> >>
> >> Please sponsor new revision of a52dec.
> >>
> >> 1) Hopefully I generated changelog with git-dch correctly
> >> 2) There is warning from lintian abo
2009/12/10 Reinhard Tartler :
> Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>
>> Hello DD's
>>
>> Please sponsor new revision of a52dec.
>>
>> 1) Hopefully I generated changelog with git-dch correctly
>> 2) There is warning from lintian about man pages. I cannot currently
>> reproduce it outside chroot and still loo
Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> Hello DD's
>
> Please sponsor new revision of a52dec.
>
> 1) Hopefully I generated changelog with git-dch correctly
> 2) There is warning from lintian about man pages. I cannot currently
> reproduce it outside chroot and still looking for ways to fix it.
>
> git clone g
Hello DD's
Please sponsor new revision of a52dec.
1) Hopefully I generated changelog with git-dch correctly
2) There is warning from lintian about man pages. I cannot currently
reproduce it outside chroot and still looking for ways to fix it.
git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia/a52dec.
13 matches
Mail list logo
