On 2011-02-02 22:35, Miguel Colon wrote:
So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust
ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of
this if agreed upon.
Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it.
Perhaps Alessio wants to pro
> So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust
> ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of
> this if agreed upon.
Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it.
> Perhaps Alessio wants to provide further clarification.
Last tim
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev,
> but this is not built by the
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html
> >
> > says:
> >
> >* Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to
> > libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy.
> >
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
>
> > Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but
> > this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides
> > libsoundtouch-dev but
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but
> this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides
> libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in
> soundtouch packaging,
