Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?
On 2011-02-02 22:35, Miguel Colon wrote: So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of this if agreed upon. Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it. Perhaps Alessio wants to provide further clarification. Last time I spoke with Alessio about it from what I understood and remember he was waiting for post-squeeze. But better to wait for an official response since I might have misunderstood. Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? The source packages affected are: Package: ardour Package: audacity Package: djplay Package: freecycle Package: gst-plugins-bad0.10 Package: ihu Package: ocaml-soundtouch Package: rezound Package: yatm In addition: - liquidsoap just needs to be rebuilt whenever ocaml-soundtouch get updated since it depends on libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev and not libsoundtouch directly. - mixx just needs to be rebuilt since it depends on libsoundtouch-dev so it should be fine after a binary upload or something. I basically got this information by adding sid/experimental source repos to the source.list and doing: grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends libsoundtouch -sPackage /var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources | sort | uniq and confirming with apt-cache rdepends (not sure if there was a better way or if doing it with these 2 commands is not exhaustive enough) I locally recompiled all the packages in a clean chroot when I made the initial rename and what I just posted are my notes from that time. Also, from what I wrote down, all packages except ocaml-soundtouch and liquidsoap worked with just renaming the build dependency but as luck would have it ardour is the only package that I forgot to document the changes I made to it so it would build. Finally I remember Alessio uploading a new version of audacity and freecycle to experimental using the renamed library so the transition on those 2 I assume is done or started. Hope I made some sense. Yes, thanks. I just wanted to raise the issue. I looked at djplay and ihu - should I just file FTBFS bugs against them to tell the maintainer to change the build-depend? Unstable seems to be unchanged, there is nothing in experimental (as of packages.debian.org), and it's not under pkg-multimedia's umbrella. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?
> So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust > ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of > this if agreed upon. Hello, yes it's a transition I was the one that made renamed it. > Perhaps Alessio wants to provide further clarification. Last time I spoke with Alessio about it from what I understood and remember he was waiting for post-squeeze. But better to wait for an official response since I might have misunderstood. >> Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but >> this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides >> libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in >> soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? The source packages affected are: Package: ardour Package: audacity Package: djplay Package: freecycle Package: gst-plugins-bad0.10 Package: ihu Package: ocaml-soundtouch Package: rezound Package: yatm In addition: - liquidsoap just needs to be rebuilt whenever ocaml-soundtouch get updated since it depends on libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev and not libsoundtouch directly. - mixx just needs to be rebuilt since it depends on libsoundtouch-dev so it should be fine after a binary upload or something. I basically got this information by adding sid/experimental source repos to the source.list and doing: grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends libsoundtouch -sPackage /var/lib/apt/lists/*Sources | sort | uniq and confirming with apt-cache rdepends (not sure if there was a better way or if doing it with these 2 commands is not exhaustive enough) I locally recompiled all the packages in a clean chroot when I made the initial rename and what I just posted are my notes from that time. Also, from what I wrote down, all packages except ocaml-soundtouch and liquidsoap worked with just renaming the build dependency but as luck would have it ardour is the only package that I forgot to document the changes I made to it so it would build. Finally I remember Alessio uploading a new version of audacity and freecycle to experimental using the renamed library so the transition on those 2 I assume is done or started. Hope I made some sense. Cheers, Miguel ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth: On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, > but this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides > libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo > in soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? The changelog in http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html says: * Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy. - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore. - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as mentioned in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004. So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of this if agreed upon. It's libsoundtouch0-dev. The question is: Why doesn't libsoundtouch-dev exist? Virtual unversioned -dev package names providing a corresponding versioned package is an optional convenience feature, not mandated. Also, it makes sense to use directly only if a single real package satisfies that virtual dependency at each distro suite. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html > > > > says: > > > >* Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to > > libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy. > > - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore. > > - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as > >mentioned > >in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004. > > > > So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust > > ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of > > this if agreed upon. > > It's libsoundtouch0-dev. The question is: Why doesn't libsoundtouch-dev > exist? It's just a Provides: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/soundtouch.git;a=blob;f=debian/control;h=64e2d9f736500c6eef76d1572d6ca9fe1d569b7f;hb=HEAD -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > > > Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but > > this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides > > libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in > > soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? > > The changelog in > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html > > says: > >* Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to > libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy. > - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore. > - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as >mentioned >in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004. > > So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust > ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of > this if agreed upon. It's libsoundtouch0-dev. The question is: Why doesn't libsoundtouch-dev exist? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but > this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides > libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in > soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem? The changelog in http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html says: * Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy. - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore. - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as mentioned in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004. So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of this if agreed upon. Perhaps Alessio wants to provide further clarification. Cheers -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
