Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-24 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 10:43 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On May 24, 2011, at 4:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> > >> Would it make sense to also add the versions since

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-24 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 24, 2011, at 4:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Would it make sense to also add the versions since it won't build with the 'puredata' package 0.43 or newer, something like: puredata-d

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-24 10:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> Also about puredata-core, it has a menu item set by puredata-core.menu. >> That means that you could have puredata-core installed without the GU

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-23 00:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Would it make sense to also add the versions since it won't build with > the 'puredata' package 0.43 or newer, something like: > > puredata-dev | puredata << 0.43 i believe this is a bug in the

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-23 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Would it make sense to also add the versions since it won't build with the 'puredata' package 0.43 or newer, something like: puredata-dev | puredata << 0.43 Also about puredata-core, it has a menu item set by puredata- core.menu. That means that you could have puredata-core installed wit

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-11 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 11, 2011, at 4:55 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ola, given that i have done most of the packaging, i guess i'll try to answer the question :-) On 2011-05-09 06:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: There are a lot of changes, so I'm wond

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ola, given that i have done most of the packaging, i guess i'll try to answer the question :-) On 2011-05-09 06:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > There are a lot of changes, so I'm wondering if we could get a summary > of what we should do to up

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Brossier
indeed, you can loosen the Build-depends to be: puredata-dev | puredata | pd Hth, piem On 09/05/11 06:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > There are a lot of changes, so I'm wondering if we could get a summary > of what we should do to update our packages, and whether there might be > any pitf

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-08 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
There are a lot of changes, so I'm wondering if we could get a summary of what we should do to update our packages, and whether there might be any pitfalls. It seems that we should now build pd libs against puredata-dev instead of puredata, for example. .hc On May 8, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Pa

Re: puredata package changes

2011-05-08 Thread Paul Brossier
Hi Hans, I guess the 'git log' and debian/changelog are the best place to look at. Any specific questions about these changes? Cheers, piem On 08/05/11 18:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Hey IOhannes and piem, > > I wonder if you could update us on all the changes to the puredata > pack

Re: Puredata package

2010-09-15 Thread Fabian Greffrath
PS: in the meantime a rc-bug for the "puredata" packages has appeared [1], which i cannot reproduce at all; if someone here could have a look at it i would be thankful. On today's sid $ sudo apt-get install puredata --no-install-recommends $ puredata works. - Fabian

Re: Puredata package

2010-09-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-09-14 22:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > > Honestly, I think he's heard it enough about it from IOhannes and me. I > think it would be helpful if others could start the discussion with him. > even though paul is really not very responsive these days i would hate to do anything with

Re: Puredata package

2010-09-14 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/09/10 19:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/09/10 16:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Also, the lack of puredata-dev makes it a bit more complicated (its in collab-maint/pureda

Re: Puredata package

2010-09-13 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 13/09/10 19:59, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On 13/09/10 16:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>> Also, the lack of puredata-dev makes it a bit more complicated >>> (its in collab-maint/puredata.git awaiting attention from the >>> Ma

Re: Puredata package

2010-09-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 13/09/10 16:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Also, the lack of puredata-dev makes it a bit more complicated (its in collab-maint/puredata.git awaiting attention from the Maintainer). These two are quite important so I wanted to get them