On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 08:27:04PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:22:10PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 06:46:20PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Files: src/milky
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:22:10PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 06:46:20PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>>Files: src/milkyplay/drivers/generic/rtaudio/oss/soundcard.h
>>Copyright: *No copyright*
>>L
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 07:22:10PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > >>Files: resources/reference/xmeffects.html
> > >>Copyright: INTERNET ARCHIVE
> > >> 2006, Yury Aliaev 2006
> > >>License: GFDL and UNKNOWN
> > >> FIXME
> > >
> > >This has to be removed as well (GNU FDL is not DFSG-compatible)
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 06:46:20PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >I had a look at the FIXMEs and there are indeed some problems
> >(sorry, if I didn't notice that before):
> >
> >>Files: src/milkyplay/drivers/generic/rtaudio/a
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
I had a look at the FIXMEs and there are indeed some problems (sorry,
if I didn't notice that before):
Files: src/milkyplay/drivers/generic/rtaudio/asio/asio.cpp
Copyright: 1997, - 2005, Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
Licen
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 04:44:54PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:26:45PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:24:55PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >>Isn't this ready for upload now, since the switch to CDBS is
> >>completed?
> >
> >Sorry,
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:26:45PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:24:55PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Isn't this ready for upload now, since the switch to CDBS is
completed?
Sorry, I got distracted.
No, I want to finish a copyright-check I am conducting - there
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:24:55PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Isn't this ready for upload now, since the switch to CDBS is completed?
Sorry, I got distracted.
No, I want to finish a copyright-check I am conducting - there seem to
be some issues. More on that when I am done.
- Jonas
Isn't this ready for upload now, since the switch to CDBS is completed?
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;;eg;say~~reverse'
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:32:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Good. Then I assume it is ok I introduce the use of control.in
> then. Since indeed it is quite useful to me to help maintain
> accurate build-dependencies which vary with the features enabled in
> each package.
Not sure. Wouldn
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:14:57PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 11:36:56PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Was that the "many problems" or did you have other concerns regarding
CDBS?
Yep, that's all. Maybe the "many problems" was a bit too exaggerated :D
Good. The
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 11:36:56PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Was that the "many problems" or did you have other concerns
> regarding CDBS?
Yep, that's all. Maybe the "many problems" was a bit too exaggerated :D
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;;eg;say~~reverse'
___
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:48:23PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What "many problems" are you referring to?
I was reffering to the use of the auto-updating Build-Depends via
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL (and #311724), but I
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> What "many problems" are you referring to?
I was reffering to the use of the auto-updating Build-Depends via
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL (and #311724), but I noticed now that you
use @cdbs@ without the DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_* thing.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I am uncertain how happy others here are about other changes that I
would wanna do - starting with enabling build-dependency
auto-resolving a.k.a. that debian/co
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I am uncertain how happy others here are about other changes that I
> would wanna do - starting with enabling build-dependency
> auto-resolving a.k.a. that debian/control.in file discussed tonight
> regarding a PureData package. S
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 02:24:46PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:35:22PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I've pushed the basic switch (autotools + debhelper). Since you are
more familiar with the get-orig-source rule, please you do it.
The *.desktop file does not get
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:35:22PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I've pushed the basic switch (autotools + debhelper). Since you are
> more familiar with the get-orig-source rule, please you do it.
The *.desktop file does not get installed on my system.
I think that DEB_DH_INSTALL_ALL in debian/
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:35:22PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not pla
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:35:22PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not pla
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
>>> I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not plan to do regular work on this
>>> package (and you do),
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:54, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not plan to do regular work on this
>> package (and you do), I think your opinion on this matter weights more
>> than mine. I do volunteer
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not plan to do regular work on this
package (and you do), I think your opinion on this matter weights
more than mine. I do volunte
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:59:45AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I do prefer CDBS. But since I do not plan to do regular work on this
> package (and you do), I think your opinion on this matter weights more
> than mine. I do volunteer to do the switch to CDBS if that is your
> choice, though.
I d
Also, I just read bug 567319... is there a reason that work was not
incorporated here?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/li
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:47, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:22:00AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Would you mind if I try switching to CDBS? This should greatly
>> simplify debian/rules.
>
> I've already switched to short-form dh (patch attached). If you want to
> conve
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:22:00AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Would you mind if I try switching to CDBS? This should greatly
> simplify debian/rules.
I've already switched to short-form dh (patch attached). If you want to
convert it to use cdbs I don't mind (dh or cdbs are the same for me)...
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 08:38, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:05:11PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Is there a special reason this package does not use any packaging helper?
>
> Nope. I just kept the rules file from the previous version.
Would you mind if I try switching
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:05:11PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Is there a special reason this package does not use any packaging helper?
Nope. I just kept the rules file from the previous version.
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;;eg;say~~reverse'
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:07, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Hi all,
> in the last couple of days I worked to package the new upstream version
> of milkytracker.
>
> Can someone please test and review it? You can find everything on git [0].
Is there a special reason this package does not use any pa
30 matches
Mail list logo
