[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#537616: [gphoto2] doesn't work as non-root

On 2009-07-19 Jürgen Richtsfeld wrote: > Package: gphoto2 > Version: 2.4.5-2 > Severity: normal > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > my current gphoto2 gives me: > $ gphoto2 -P > *** Error *** > An error occurred in the io-library ('Could not claim the USB device'): Could > not

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#436031: gphoto2 -L fails due to wrong owner/mode on /proc/bus/usb/004/018

On 2007-08-04 Marc Haber wrote: > Package: gphoto2 > Version: 2.3.1-5 > Severity: normal > Hi, > I do not have the slightest idea which package is real culprit here, > so I'll report the bug against the app which was most helpful in > finding the issue. > When I connect my Canon Ixus 50 to my s

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#604135: RM: libpano12 -- ROM; superseded by libpano13, orphaned

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove libpano12 (binaries libpano12-0 libpano12-bin libpano12-dev) from unstable. It has been superseded by libpano13, there are no reverse dependencies in sid. Technically I am not maintainer of libpano12, but: * libpano12 is orphaned #554056 * I

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#603772: previews seem not to do anything, as the preview is in fact the tiny square at the bottom of the screen

On 2010-11-17 jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Package: hugin-data > Version: 2010.0.0+dfsg-3 > Severity: wishlist > File: /usr/share/hugin/xrc/data/help_en_EN/Control_points.html > By the way, the preview buttons don't have any "OK" button on them, so > one will never get a preview, despite > http://

[Pkg-phototools-devel] 603768 - package description review

Hello, could somebody please check the changes to the short descriptions of the hugin packages quoted below? thanks in advance, cu andreas --- --- GIT/writing/hugin/debian/control2010-11-20 16:07:48.0 +0100 +++ /tmp/control2010-11-20 19:07:03.0

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#522550: libgphoto2-2: Error (-53: 'Could not claim the USB device')

On 2009-04-04 mitch wrote: > Package: libgphoto2-2 > Version: 2.4.4-1 > Severity: important > An error occurred in the io-library ('Could not claim the USB device'): > Could not claim interface 0 (Operation not permitted). Make sure no > other program or kernel module (such as sdc2xx, stv680, s

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] 603768 - package description review

Sebastian Harl wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> could somebody please check the changes to the short descriptions of >> the hugin packages quoted below? > Sounds good to me. thanks, commited. _

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#551006: hugin: Hugin crashes at startup with "segmentation fault"

On 2009-10-14 Stefano Bettelli wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 0.8.0.dfsg-2 > Severity: normal > As soon as I run the program "hugin", it displays the > main canvas then crashes. If "tip of the day" is enabled, > I can see the tip, but as soon as I close the info window > the program crashes.

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#608341: canon ixus 130 works here

On 2010-12-30 Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Hi, > what exactly fails? My canon ixus 130 seems to work just fine with > gphoto at least on amd64 sid: [...] > (sid)li...@sauna:~$ sudo gphoto2 -P > Downloading `IMG_0001.JPG' from folder `/store_00010001/DCIM/100___12## [...] You are using sudo. Gen

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#608341: [libgphoto2-2] please add support for Canon IXUS 130 (lsusb -v attached)

On 2010-12-30 Bastian Venthur wrote: > Package: libgphoto2-2 > Version: 2.4.10.1-3 > Severity: normal > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > Bus 002 Device 006: ID 04a9:31f3 Canon, Inc. > Device Descriptor: > bLength18 > bDescriptorType 1 > bcdUSB

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Unsubscribing from pkg-phototools lists

On 2011-01-03 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I haven't been active in the past months, and I'm afraid it won't > change in the near future so I'm going to unsubscribe from the > pkg-phototools lists. I'd appreciate if you could remove myself from > Uploaders while uploading new revisions of the packages

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#608341: [libgphoto2-2] please add support for Canon IXUS 130 (lsusb -v attached)

On 2011-01-02 Bastian Venthur wrote: > Thanks for your patch, it works. There are two things: > 1. With your patch I'm able to access the camera as Canon IXUS 130 in > KDE's filemanager, w/o your patch I'm only able to access it with > gphoto2 (Why?). W/o your patch the camera is also correctly r

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Request: Update OpenEXR from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0 (July 2010)

On 2011-02-10 Dorian Fevrier wrote: > Hi! I'm a CG artist working on mental ray shaders. :) > I just would like to ask you if it was possible to update the OpenEXR lib? > Currently OpenEXR is in version 1.6.1. But the last version on the > official page is 1.7.0 (July 2010): > http://www.openexr

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Team policy for repository layout?

David Paleino wrote: > while working on {lib,}gphoto2, I noticed I'm not really used to the > debian/-only layout with git. I'm rather more used to > git-buildpackage's layout (master+upstream+pristine-tar). > Is there a team policy or other forbidding/discouraging this? I'd > *really* like conve

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

David Paleino wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc >> (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel >> (new) libgphoto2-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc > Just for clarification, these a

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

Andreas Metzler wrote: > David Paleino wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >>> (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc >>> (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel >>> (new) libgphoto2

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

David Paleino wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc >> (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel >> (new) libgphoto2-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc > Just for clarification, these a

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

David Paleino wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:35:34 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Andreas Metzler wrote: >> > David Paleino wrote: >> >> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> >>> (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > There are (at least) three missing package relationships: > libgphoto2-dev Breaks: libgphoto2-2-dev > libgphoto2-dev-doc Breaks: libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-3) > libgphoto2-doc Breaks: libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-3) Sorry f

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

David Paleino wrote: [...] > For the upcoming -5, I re-merged libgphoto2-doc into libgphoto2-2, and split > out localized messages into a libgphoto2-l10n, recommended by libgphoto2-2. > I haven't uploaded this yet, but the changes have been pushed to the > repository, the most important being: >

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#615708: enblend-enfuse: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed

On 2011-02-28 Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: enblend-enfuse > Version: 4.0+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > Tags: sid > User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de > Usertags: no-add-needed > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > ld --no-add-needed. For details, please see: > ht

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#615708: enblend-enfuse: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed

On 2011-03-01 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2011-02-28 Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: enblend-enfuse [...] > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > > ld --no-add-needed. For details, please see: > > http://lists.debian.org/de

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#621619: libgphoto2: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs

# Add versioning info found 621619 2.4.6-3 tags 621619 pending thanks On 2011-04-07 codeh...@debian.org wrote: > Package: libgphoto2 > Severity: normal > User: codeh...@debian.org > Usertags: la-file-removal > To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy > 10.2 and to ease th

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#622390: hugin: does not find /usr/bin/autopano-noop.sh for creating control points

tags 622390 = unreproducible thanks On 2011-04-12 malenki wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2010.4.0+dfsg-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i patch > When clicking on "create control points" hugin complains about > "/usr/bin/autopano-noop.sh cannot be found" > (temporary) solution: link /usr/bin/a

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#622390: hugin: does not find /usr/bin/autopano-noop.sh for creating control points

On 2011-04-14 malenki wrote: > Am Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:29:23 +0200 > schrieb Andreas Metzler : >> On 2011-04-13 malenki wrote: >> [...] >>> Partly right :) >>> Loading defaults did not change the behaviour. >>> So I renamed ~/.hugin to ~/.hugin_

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#622390: hugin: does not find /usr/bin/autopano-noop.sh for creating control points

On 2011-04-16 malenki wrote: > Am Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:35:15 +0200 > schrieb Andreas Metzler : [...] >> Thanks. Just for completeness sake: Resetting the CP-Detector settings >> (Open File->Preferences, switch to the [Control Point Detectors] tab >> and activate the [Loa

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#625061: enblend-enfuse: FTBFS: ../../src/filenameparse.cc:53:9: error: 'basic_path' in namespace 'boost::filesystem' does not name a type

tags 625061 pending thanks On 2011-05-02 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: enblend-enfuse > Version: 4.0+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110502 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 [...] Hello, upstream has fixed this in

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Please reschedule enblend-enfuse 4.0+dfsg-3 for mipsel

Hello, afaict from the failed build log for enblend-enfuse on mipsel the build was killed, it did not fail. Please reschedule. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=enblend-enfuse&arch=mipsel&ver=4.0%2Bdfsg-3&stamp=1305423812 thanks, cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Please reschedule enblend-enfuse 4.0+dfsg-3 for mipsel

On 2011-06-04 Andreas Metzler wrote: > afaict from the failed build log for enblend-enfuse on mipsel the build > was killed, it did not fail. Please reschedule. > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=enblend-enfuse&arch=mipsel&ver=4.0%2Bdfsg-3&stamp=1305423812 Hel

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Please reschedule enblend-enfuse 4.0+dfsg-3 for mipsel

On 2011-06-19 Andreas Barth wrote: > * Andreas Metzler (ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org) [110619 14:36]: >> sorry to disturb you again, it looks like the second try on phrixos >> also failed. ("Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of >> inactivity".) Is it

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#633381: hugin-tools: nona doesn't work with OJPEG

On 2011-07-09 alberto wrote: > Package: hugin-tools > Version: 2011.0.0+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal [...] > hugin fails to make a panorama. Seems a problem with nona. Some log: [...] Could you make the image files and the hugin prohject file (*.pto) available? thanks, cu andreas __

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#633381: hugin-tools: nona doesn't work with OJPEG

On 2011-07-10 Alberto Hernando wrote: > 2011/7/10 Andreas Metzler >> On 2011-07-09 alberto wrote: >>> Package: hugin-tools >>> Version: 2011.0.0+dfsg-1 >>> Severity: normal >> [...] >>> hugin fails to make a panorama. Seems a problem with nona

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] hugin_2011.2.0+dfsg~rc2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Accepted: > hugin-data_2011.2.0+dfsg~rc2-1_all.deb > to main/h/hugin/hugin-data_2011.2.0+dfsg~rc2-1_all.deb [...] This package includes the python support, both a wrapper to access hugin function from python (hsi) and customizable python scripts executed from within t

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#638029: hugin: Segfault when trying to perform step 2 is assistant

On 2011-08-16 Alex Ankudinov wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2011.0.0+dfsg-2 > Severity: important > I have just installed hugin and tried to make first panorama with > hugin assistant. Step 1 is ok, I have downloaded 3 photoes. Then I > click on the second button. It does something and shows

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#638270: enblend-enfuse: FTBFS on armel

On 2011-08-18 Julien Cristau wrote: > Source: enblend-enfuse [...] > > arm-linux-gnueabi-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -D_GNU_SOURCE > > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I../include -DVIGRA_STATIC_LIB -pthread > > -I/usr/include/OpenEXR -g -O2 --param inline-unit-growth=60 -O2 -DNDEBUG > > -Wall -M

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#638029: hugin: Segfault when trying to perform step 2 is assistant

On 2011-08-18 Александр wrote: > 2011/8/17 Andreas Metzler >> On 2011-08-16 Alex Ankudinov wrote: >>> Package: hugin >>> Version: 2011.0.0+dfsg-2 >>> Severity: important >>> I have just installed hugin and tried to make first panorama with >>&

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#643747: hugin-tools: dependency problem with python version

On 2011-09-29 Albert Dengg wrote: > Package: hugin-tools > Version: 2011.2.0+dfsg~rc5-1 > Severity: normal > hi, > since the standard python version seems to have moved to 2.7, the > package is not installable any longer [...] Thanks for the hint, will fix soon. > ps: even though i have the exp

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#646315: RFA: qtpfsgui -- graphical user interface providing a workflow for HDR imaging

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the qtpfsgui package. The package description is: Features: * Create an HDR file from a set of images (formats: JPEG, TIFF 8bit and 16bit, RAW) of the same scene taken at different exposure setting. * Save and load HDR images. * R

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Move from qtpfsgui to luminance-hdr?

On 2011-10-22 Leonardo Montecchi wrote: > Hello Debian PhotoTools Maintaners, > as you may know, the Qtpfsgui package has changed name to > "luminance-hdr" ( see http://qtpfsgui.sourceforge.net/ ). The has now > reached version 2.1.0, which contains some nice improvements over the > old qtpfsgui

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#651426: RFA: libpuzzle

Package: wnpp Severity: normal libpuzzle is maintained in the pkg-phototools GIT repository. Cyril Brulebois who did all the maintainer uploads had to reshuffle his priorities in January: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-phototools-devel/2011-January/003289.html Up to this date no exis

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#655312: hugin: segfaults at startup

On 2012-01-10 Stefan Froehlich wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2010.0.0+dfsg-3+b1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > hugin segfaults right at startup due to an invalid free(). This bug differs > from 649171 and 551006, as no canvas is displayed at all. Below you can

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#655312: hugin: segfaults at startup

On 2012-01-11 Stefan Froehlich wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:17:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > hugin segfaults right at startup [...] > > would you mind checking whether 2011.4.0 works for you? It is > > available in sid/wheezy and squeeze-backports. >

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#655312: hugin: segfaults at startup

On 2012-01-17 Stefan Froehlich wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:18:17PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Does it also crash with software rendering? > > env LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 hugin > Unfortunately: yes. [...] Darn. Any chance the system binaries are corrupted (de

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#655312: hugin: segfaults at startup

On 2012-01-11 Stefan Froehlich wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:17:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > hugin segfaults right at startup [...] > > would you mind checking whether 2011.4.0 works for you? It is > > available in sid/wheezy and squeeze-backports. >

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#655312: hugin: segfaults at startup

On 2012-01-21 Stefan Froehlich wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:26:47PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Does glxgears (from mesa-utils) work for you? > Actually it does not: > | sfroehli@sokrates:~$ glxgears > | X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid reque

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#655312: hugin: segfaults at startup

On 2012-01-21 Stefan Froehlich wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Using the software renderer instead of DRI (apt-get --purge install > > libgl1-mesa-swx11) might work. > Unfortunately, this doesnt' work either :-( I am a lit

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#638029: Reproduced

On 2012-01-22 Asbj�rn S�b� wrote: [...] > Reproduce 2 > > * Start hugin from command line > * Load images (3 .jpgs from a Nikon D90) > * Try to open fast preview window > * hugin immediately crashes with a segfault as described above > (same output, same mess

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#666297: openexr: FTBFS: configure:1559: error: cannot run /bin/bash ./config.sub

On 2012-03-30 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: openexr > Version: 1.6.1-4.1 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > Hi, > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pac

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#666297: openexr: FTBFS: configure:1559: error: cannot run /bin/bash ./config.sub

On 2012-03-31 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2012-03-30 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [...] > > Relevant part: > > > make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' > > > dh_auto_configure -- --with-openexr-prefix=/usr > > > configure: error: cannot run /bin/bash ./c

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#586607: hugin: enblend default arguments do not seem to make it into the Makefile

On 2010-06-21 Michael Deegan wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2010.0.0+dfsg-3 > Severity: normal > The makefile generator does not seem to use the enblend arguments specified > in Hugin's preferences. It seems to always assume "-z". [...] The setting in the preferences is for *new* projects. S

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#666375: enblend-enfuse: FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: pdfetex exited with bad status, quitting.

See #666532. ___ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Is pfstools still maintained

On 2012-05-08 Thomas Weber wrote: > Hi, > I'm thinking about NMUing pfstools for the Octave transition. However, > looking at the PTS I see that there was no update in 2 years and that > the package is still using QT3 despite a QT4 upstream version being > available for a year: > http://sourcefo

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#671998: hugin: FTBFS with gcc 4.7 bug

Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (08/05/2012): >> Hi pkg-phototools guys, >> hugin was binNMUd for the exiv2 transition, and FTBFS due to the recent, >> insane switch to gcc 4.7; for whatever reason, no bugs were filed up to >> now, so here we go. [...] > A patch is attached for the incl

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#671998: hugin: FTBFS with gcc 4.7 bug

On 2012-05-10 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (09/05/2012): > > Looks good so far, except for s390 :/ > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=hugin&suite=experimental > FWIW I think we'll go with a temporary removal from testing to let exiv2 > migrate ASAP, given it would g

[Pkg-phototools-devel] GIT commit permissions without Debian account?

Hello, Leonardo Montecchi has offered to maintain luminance-hdr (aka qtpfgui) if I helped on the packaging side. We have made the thirst upload yesterday (curently in NEW) ;-) Now the question of commiting has come up: "I would like to be able to commit, if possible. But I'm also fine with commit

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#662314: enblend-enfuse: Please Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev

retitle 662314 enblend-enfuse: cannot be built against libpng-dev 1.5.11-1 forwarded 662314 https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/hugin-ptx/_AgBds0QjYM thanks On 2012-03-05 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Source: enblend-enfuse > Version: 4.0+dfsg-4 > Severity: important > User: lib...@p

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#666396: openexr: New upstream: 1.7.0

On 2012-03-30 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: libopenexr6 > Version: 1.6.1-4.1 > Severity: normal > File: openexr > There is a new upstream for openexr. It would be nice to update it > Thanks [...] Hello, Just to not have this sitting here uncommented: I actually had started packaging the n

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Bits from the Hugin PPA Packagers

2012.0.0~beta1+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream version. -- Andreas Metzler Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:13:30 +0200 hugin (2011.5.0.20120720+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low * Package HG 'default' branch, which is supposed to be released as 2012.0.0. * Drop patches pulled f

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Bits from the Hugin PPA Packagers

On 2012-07-28 Stefan Peter wrote: > On 27.07.2012 18:37, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > thanks for the heads-up, however I have got the strong feeling of > > duplicate work happening. > > We already have this in experimental (Includes your patches 1, 2): > Sorry,

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Bits from the Hugin PPA Packagers

On 2012-07-28 Stefan Peter wrote: > On 27.07.2012 18:37, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > We will need a equivalent of Patch 3 in experimental, though. > I will have a look at this. Hello Stefan, I have just made a new hugin upload to experimental, updating the source to tip of

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#542258: enblend-enfuse: embeds the VIGRA library

block 542258 with 587063 thanks On 2009-08-18 Jakub Wilk wrote: > Package: enblend-enfuse > Version: 3.2+dfsg-2 > Severity: normal > Enblend embeds a modified version of the VIGRA 1.4 library. However, > this library is already packaged for Debian[1]. It would be great if > the necessary changes

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#542258: enblend-enfuse: embeds the VIGRA library

On 2012-09-29 Andreas Metzler wrote: > OTOH libvigraimpex has been orphaned in Debian (#587063). There is some good news, though: An updated version (1.8.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2) has been uploaded to Ubuntu a couple of days ago. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His ot

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#685301: luminance-hdr description does not advertise CR2 support

On 2012-08-19 David Smith wrote: > Package: luminance-hdr > Version: 2.2.1-3 > Severity: wishlist > luminance-hdr does not say in it's description that it is capable of > opening raw CR2 files. Hello, FWIW the description does say that the software features RAW support ("Create an HDR file from

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Please retry openexr on beefy buildd

Hello, openexr 1.6.1-7 did not build on multiple buildds: armel/mips: killed after too long inactivity. Please retry on a faster machine or with a longer timeout. s390: Segfault in testsuite. However it is not reproducible in hercules. There are no source changes in openexr 1.6.1-7, and 1.6.1-6

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#696546: unblock: openexr/1.6.1-7

. ++ Use debhelper v9 compat, bump build-dep. Drop unneeded invocation of + dpkg-buildflags. ++ Update *.install. ++ Add Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}. ++ Runtime library is Multi-Arch: same, cmd-line utils Multi-Arch: foreign. + + -- Andreas Metzler Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:23:33 +010

[Pkg-phototools-devel] enblend-enfuse 4.1 for experimental

Hello, I have packaged enblend-enfuse 4.1 to distract myself from not being able to ride my snowboard currently. ;-) Code is in GIT (branch experimental), I will upload to experimental unless Sebastian would prefer to delay. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His oth

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#698561: libilmbase-dev: Typo in package description: "relesaed"

tags 698561 pending thanks On 2013-01-20 Pascal De Vuyst wrote: > Package: libilmbase-dev [...] > Dear Maintainer, > The package description contains a small typo: > a set of utility libraries relesaed by ILM and used by OpenEXR. > Should be: > a set of utility libraries released by ILM and us

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#701272: enblend-enfuse: ftbfs with GCC-4.8

On 2013-02-23 Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:enblend-enfuse > Version: 4.0+dfsg-4 > Severity: important > Tags: sid jessie > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.8 > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-4.8/g++-4.8, but succeeds to b

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#702805: hugin crashes on startup after showing the splashscreen

On 2013-03-11 kie wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2013.0.0~beta1+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > Dear Maintainer, > hugin crashes on startup after showing the splashscreen. > I used the version from testing and then tried the experimental version > with exactly the same result. [...] Can you suc

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Dependencies of hugin-2013.0

On 2013-03-13 Stefan Peter wrote: > Hi Debian PhotoTools Maintainers > Whilst trying to backport hugin-20130-beta1 to ubuntu Lucid Lynx, I > noticed that the new pto_vars tool in hugin-tools requires libboost >= > 1.41. The actual error message is > hugin-2013.0.0/src/tools/ParseExp.cpp:39:2: err

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#702805: hugin crashes on startup after showing the splashscreen

On 2013-03-11 kie wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2013.0.0~beta1+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > Dear Maintainer, > hugin crashes on startup after showing the splashscreen. > I used the version from testing and then tried the experimental version > with exactly the same result. [...] > The progra

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#707541: hugin: FTBFS: xtime.hpp:23:5: error: expected identifier before numeric constant

On 2013-05-09 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: hugin > Version: 2011.4.0+dfsg-5 [...] > > /usr/include/boost/thread/xtime.hpp: In function 'int xtime_get(xtime*, > > int)': > > /usr/include/boost/thread/xtime.hpp:73:40: error: 'get_system_time' was not > > declared in this scope [...] This is ca

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] failed (s390|mipsel) build of hugin 2013.0.0~beta1+dfsg-2

On 2013-05-20 Stefan Peter wrote: [...] > This is fixed in the 2013 branch for the upcoming beta2. Please see > http://sourceforge.net/p/hugin/hugin/ci/9928ad3bd9894ad9f7ce1adb1dab40050658f917/ > and > http://sourceforge.net/p/hugin/hugin/ci/d531b2083ca3d8d7105218410fc1e9e7614c05a0/ > It affects

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#711053: hugin: Hugin crashes X system and machine has to be rebooted to recover

reassign 711053 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau severity 711053 important thanks On 2013-06-04 "rowan.windwhist...@gmail.com" wrote: [...] >* What led up to the situation? Simply start hugin from a terminal and teh > whole X system crashes and cannot be started again till the sytem is rebooted.

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#711997: hugin: Hugin fails with segfault; program partially unusable

On 2013-06-11 charlie wrote: [...] > Started hugin, started loading photos as usual (bug repros with a single > photo). After loading images, clicking on Preview/Layout/Etc. tab causes > segfault. [...] Do you have working OpenGL support? Does 'glxgears -info'? Could you provide a backtrace?

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#711997: hugin: Hugin fails with segfault; program partially unusable

On 2013-06-14 Charlie Hagedorn wrote: > mesa-utils was not installed. After installing it (didn't pull in any other > packages), I get: > [:~]$ glxgears -info > Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0". > Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual > [:~]$ And at this point it sim

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#711997: hugin: Hugin fails with segfault; program partially unusable

On 2013-06-18 Charlie Hagedorn wrote: > > > [:~]$ glxgears -info > > > Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0". > > > Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual > > > [:~]$ > > > > And at this point it simply exits? > > > Yes. > > Do you have libgl1-mesa-dri or libgl1-mesa-swx1

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#712997: "Move/Drag" panel not "dragging"

On 2013-06-21 Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2013.0.0~beta1+dfsg-3 > Severity: normal > I can't seem to be able to drag any image in the Move/Drag panel in any mode > (normal, mosaic or the individual combinations). This used to work some time > ago, as I used this feature regular

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#712997: "Move/Drag" panel not "dragging"

On 2013-06-22 Yuri D'Elia wrote: > On 06/22/2013 02:10 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Can you please check which version of hugin broke for you? >> (http://snapshot.debian.org has got the old binaries.) > 2011.4.0+dfsg-5 was the lowest I could try without breaking other &g

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#711997: hugin: Hugin fails with segfault; program partially unusable

On 2013-07-03 Charlie Hagedorn wrote: > Restarted X (it had been up through a few updates), and the problem with > hugin persists. Xorg.0.log attached. [...] Hello, this looks broken: [2600271.575] (II) LoadModule: "glx" [2600271.575] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux/libglx.so [2600271.

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#666396: openexr: New upstream: 1.7.0

On 2013-06-29 IRIE Shinsuke wrote: > Hi, > I experienced the same error in testBox.cpp with libilmbase 2.0.0. > It seems that the error was caused by bad optimization, because the > build succeeds when changing the optimization level as follows: [...] > Anyway, please update openexr/ilmbase to v

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#722349: hugin crashes on picture load

On 2013-09-10 Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2013.0.0~rc1+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > hugin crashes when I try to load any image > these are the messages if I start it in a terminal: [...] > hugin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/hugin/libhuginbase.so.0.0: undefined > sy

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#723153: hugin: processing files in a mktemp -d directory fails

On 2013-09-16 Paul Seyfert wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2011.4.0+dfsg-5 [...] > I copied the files which I want to stitch to a panorama into a directory > created by "mktemp -d". > I start hugin, open the "add files" dialog, select all files in the newly > created directory (/tmp/tmp.ImRxo9j

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#723153: hugin: processing files in a mktemp -d directory fails

forwarded 723153 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1227813 thanks On 2013-09-19 Paul Seyfert wrote: > On 17.09.2013 19:18, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> Could you please retry with up to date hugin? - It is available in >> backports. > I upgraded hugin to the backports

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#727751: enblend-enfuse: FTBFS on mipsel but built there in the past

On 2013-10-26 Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: enblend-enfuse > Version: 4.0+dfsg-6 > Severity: serious > Hi, > Your package FTBFS on mipsel but built there in the past. It looks > like it is an ICE, so you may have to reassign the bug to the relevant > compiler/part of the toolchain. Hello, i

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#747021: hugin: crash with segfault on loading multiple pictures in step 1 of assistent

On 2014-05-04 Ingo wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2014.0.0~rc2+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > I just started Hugin and following the introduchtion hit I wanted to > load 3 photos. Clicking on the "step 1 button" opens the usual file > selection window and after marking/selecting 3 *.jpg pictu

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#753239: enblend-enfuse: FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: pdfetex exited with bad status, quitting.

Control: reassign 753239 texlive-latex-recommended 2014.20140626-1 On 2014-06-29 David Suárez wrote: > Source: enblend-enfuse [...] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > Relevant part (hopefully): > > /«BUILDDIR»/enblend-enfuse-4.1.2+dfsg/doc/enbl

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#759719: openexr FTBFS on ppc64el -> NMU pending

On 2014-08-29 Andreas Barth wrote: [...] > As openexr is required to build kde4libs (which is blocker for a bunch > of other packages) I intend to upload a fix for this issue tomorrow > evening unless there is a reason why not. I will take the opportunity and make an upload which a) fixes the bug

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Please restart hugin/powerpc

Hello, please restart the hugin build on PowerPC, it is stuck at "building" for 8 days. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' ___ Pkg-phot

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Outdeted toolchain on powerpc-unicamp-01.debian.org

Good Morning, Please update powerpc-unicamp-01.debian.org's buildd chroot. It is still using gcc-4.9 4.9.1-5, which is known to be affected by 752733, and therefore failed to build hugin yesterday.

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#765573: hugin: Creation timestamp metadata not set on created panorama (regression)

On 2014-10-16 Ayke van Laethem wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2014.0.0+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > When creating a panorama using "Create panorama" in the Assistant tab, > Hugin doesn't save the "Create Date" or "Date/Time Original" Exif > headers. This used to work previously for me. I'm not

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#765573: hugin: Creation timestamp metadata not set on created panorama (regression)

On 2014-10-16 Ayke van Laethem wrote: > I've seen this feature being referenced in a different bug, so it > really was there before: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/679932 >> were these two headers be copied from (one of) the input images or >> were they set by hugin (time of panorama gen

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#766093: Multiple assertion failures

On 2014-10-20 Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 2014.0.0+dfsg-1+b1 > Severity: important > Something seems to be broken in either hugin or wxgtk3 right now. > Starting hugin with no existing configuration gives me the following > startup assertion failures: > $ hugin > 10:22:20 PM:

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#766093:

On 2014-11-19 Ayke van Laethem wrote: > I still get an assertion failure, using hugin version 2014.0.0+dfsg-2 (the > system Debian jessie/testing, fully updated right now). > ASSERT INFO: > /usr/include/wx-3.0/wx/strvararg.h(456): assert "(argtype & > (wxFormatStringSpecifier::value)) == argtype"

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] hugin

Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/12/2007, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Hmm. Strange, I have been using a backport of Ubuntu's >> 0.7~beta4-0ubuntu3 on etch[1], built and linked against libpano12-dev >> 2.8.3, without any evidence of a failed dlopen

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491335: hugin: insufficient build-depends, seems to require libexiv2-dev 0.12

Package: hugin Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1 Severity: normal Hello, I have tried backporting hugin for etch. Ir FTBFS with etch's libexiv2-dev. From ./CMakeModules/FindExiv2.cmake it looks like 0.12 is required. I got a successful build against 0.15-1. For reference, these are the respective lines

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491539: enblend is required by the now, should be a dependency

Package: hugin-tools Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1 Severity: normal Hello, previously enblend was optional, the hugin GUI offered optons to stitch without it. Nowadays enblend is required. This is a limitation of the GUI, nona could still stitch without enblend. I would suggest dropping enblend from

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#491227: hugin-tools: Uses enblend 3.1's --compression option, currently Debian has enblend 3.0

On 2008-07-17 Steve Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: hugin-tools > Version: 0.7.0~svn3191-1 > Severity: important > When generating a blended panorama, hugin attempts to run enblend > with the option > --compression NONE > but enblend 3.0 (the one currently in Debian) doesn't rec

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#405862: hugin: configured to call autopano.exe, should be autopano (and needs dependency)

On 2007-01-06 Norman Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 0.6.1-1 > Severity: important > Clicking the 'create control points' button results in the following error > message: > command: autopanog.exe --output autopano_result_tempfile.pto --imagelist > /tmp/ap_imgnamesR

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#428295: hugin uninstallable in sid / missing libboost-thread

forcemerge 484754 428295 thanks On 2007-06-10 Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: hugin > Version: 0.6.1-1 > Hi, > hugin is currently uninstallable in pure SID as > libboost-thread1.33.1 does not exist anymore. 484754 and 428295 are the same bug. The issue is fixed in sid by h

  1   2   3   >