Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> wrote: > David Paleino <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>>> (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc >>> (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel >>> (new) libgphoto2-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc >> Just for clarification, these are the NEW packages. The old libgphoto2-2-dev >> has been renamed to libgphoto2-dev, to ease transitions in case of a SONAME >> bump. > [...] > Afaiui this does not actually ease any transition, it just > makes it *now* instead of at some unknown point in the future. > Am I missing something? I am asking since there is a non-neglible cost of this transition, 15 rc-bugs, making backports harder, etc. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
