David Paleino <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > For the upcoming -5, I re-merged libgphoto2-doc into libgphoto2-2, and split > out localized messages into a libgphoto2-l10n, recommended by libgphoto2-2.
> I haven't uploaded this yet, but the changes have been pushed to the > repository, the most important being: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-phototools/libgphoto2.git;a=commitdiff;h=f16759822b7647f4162f87051e05f88cc08ced28 [...] Hello, libgphoto2-dev-doc installs apidocs.html to usr/share/doc/libgphoto2-2 while the old libgphoto2-2-dev used usr/share/doc/libgphoto2. Doesn't this make Breaks: libgphoto2-2-dev (<= 2.4.10.1-3) Replaces: libgphoto2-2-dev (<= 2.4.10.1-3) in libgphoto2-dev-doc unnecessary? ------------------ I think the relationship between libgphoto2-l10n and libgphoto2-2 should be a versioned one, like this: libgphoto2-2 (>= {source:Upstream-Version}) I would go for a dependency, instead of a recommends BTW, but I guess that is a matter of personal preference. (Unless the following suggestion is accepted.) ------------------ How about naming libgphoto2-l10n libgphoto2-data instead and adding both /usr/share/libgphoto2/ and /usr/share/doc/libgphoto2-2/ to it? hth, cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
