Re: [Plplot-devel] #define PLD_* questions

2009-08-16 Thread Maurice LeBrun
Yeah, I have no recollection why either, but agree it was probably something like what you describe. On Friday, August 14, 2009 at 21:32:12 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes: > > Perhaps it was because config.h was only available on autoconf > generated builds in the past. The plDevs.h version must h

Re: [Plplot-devel] #define PLD_* questions

2009-08-15 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2009-08-14 21:32+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > Perhaps it was because config.h was only available on autoconf > generated builds in the past. The plDevs.h version must have > been useful for windows and other builds. There was a lot of > duplication like this in config.h and plConfig.h which I >

Re: [Plplot-devel] #define PLD_* questions

2009-08-14 Thread Andrew Ross
Perhaps it was because config.h was only available on autoconf generated builds in the past. The plDevs.h version must have been useful for windows and other builds. There was a lot of duplication like this in config.h and plConfig.h which I pruned out recently as well. With cmake the distinction

[Plplot-devel] #define PLD_* questions

2009-08-14 Thread Alan W. Irwin
To Maurice and Andrew: Since the earth was cooling we seemed to have been maintaining a list of configurable #define PLD_* macros in both include/plDevs.h.cmake and config.h.cmake, and I have a question about those configurable macros. Could one of you (or anybody else here) remind me why we main