On 2011-03-20 18:00-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Alan W. Irwin
> wrote:
>> On 2011-03-06 19:58-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>>
>>> OCaml should be matching more closely now:
>>
>> Hi Hez:
>>
>> The C implementation of the range adjustment sucked in an obvious
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2011-03-06 19:58-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>
>> OCaml should be matching more closely now:
>
> Hi Hez:
>
> The C implementation of the range adjustment sucked in an obvious way
> so I had to change it and all other implementations of ex
On 2011-03-06 19:58-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> OCaml should be matching more closely now:
Hi Hez:
The C implementation of the range adjustment sucked in an obvious way
so I had to change it and all other implementations of example 27
including the OCaml one. Since I am floundering around w
On 2011-03-06 19:58-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Alan W. Irwin
> wrote:
>> Here is the latest (revision 11607) diff report that tracks how well
>> we have propagated C example changes to other languages.
>>
>
>>
>> I have excluded OCaml from the above because
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Here is the latest (revision 11607) diff report that tracks how well
> we have propagated C example changes to other languages.
>
>
> I have excluded OCaml from the above because that is still disabled by
> default while Hez works on those bi
Here is the latest (revision 11607) diff report that tracks how well
we have propagated C example changes to other languages.
c++
Missing examples:
Differing postscript output :
Missing stdout :
Differing stdout:
f77
Missing examples
