Re: [Plplot-devel] gfortran problem

2007-09-09 Thread Arjen Markus
> > Thanks for that test, Andrew. > > Does anybody have access to Debian stable (etch)? It would be interesting > to see whether that version of gfortran (4.1.1) supports the intrinsic > transfer function as well so that it can build our f95 interface. > > As far as PLplot is concerned, I think a

Re: [Plplot-devel] gfortran problem

2007-09-08 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2007-09-08 22:49+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > Alan, > > Just to confirm that on Ubuntu feisty with gfortran 4.1.2 I get no > errors with the f95 bindings so it looks like this might be a problem > with your version of gfortran. Thanks for that test, Andrew. Does anybody have access to Debian s

Re: [Plplot-devel] gfortran problem

2007-09-08 Thread Andrew Ross
Alan, Just to confirm that on Ubuntu feisty with gfortran 4.1.2 I get no errors with the f95 bindings so it looks like this might be a problem with your version of gfortran. Andrew On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 08:03:46PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > gfortran has the following error as a result of Arj

[Plplot-devel] gfortran problem

2007-09-07 Thread Alan W. Irwin
gfortran has the following error as a result of Arjen's recent transfer1 change: /home/software/plplot_cvs/HEAD/plplot_cmake/bindings/f95/configurable.f90: In function รข: /home/software/plplot_cvs/HEAD/plplot_cmake/bindings/f95/configurable.f90:44: fatal error: gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Scalariza