On 2008-10-09 23:47-0500 Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> To be clear, the latter statement means a primary goal of AT_BOP and AT_EOP
> was to suppress empty pages that crept into the plotting session by mistake
> or sloppy programming. That's not been changed overall, correct?
Correct. To see exactly w
On 2008-10-09 23:42-0500 Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> On Saturday, October 4, 2008 at 16:46:53 (-0700) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > I made the empty-page fix, and indeed that fixed the example 23 issue for
> > the pages which consisted just of text (see my recent post on the svg
> > status). However, in
On Thursday, October 9, 2008 at 23:42:11 (-0500) Maurice LeBrun writes:
> On Saturday, October 4, 2008 at 16:46:53 (-0700) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > On 2008-10-04 14:04-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Maurice:
> > >
> > > I have just committed my first attempt (see src/README.pag
On Saturday, October 4, 2008 at 16:46:53 (-0700) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> On 2008-10-04 14:04-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> > Hi Maurice:
> >
> > I have just committed my first attempt (see src/README.pages) to annotate
> > all the code fragments in our source code that affect paging and fami
On 2008-10-04 14:04-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Hi Maurice:
>
> I have just committed my first attempt (see src/README.pages) to annotate
> all the code fragments in our source code that affect paging and familying.
> Could you please give this a critical read? I am especially interested in
> the
Hi Maurice:
I have just committed my first attempt (see src/README.pages) to annotate
all the code fragments in our source code that affect paging and familying.
Could you please give this a critical read? I am especially interested in
the open question of whether plsc->page_status should be set
