Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 7:08 PM > To: Arjen Markus > Cc: Greg Jung; PLplot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin >

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-24 10:22- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > > That certainly did the trick. See the attached list of packages after running > "pacman -Sy" Excellent news, and thanks for that list. If you look for "installed" in that list, you will find that (as you said before) you are out of

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Greg, From: Greg Jung [mailto:gvj...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:41 PM To: Alan W. Irwin Cc: Arjen Markus; PLplot development list Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin You may need to revise your list of mirrors, 3.4.1 is found on sourceforge

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

You may need to revise your list of mirrors, 3.4.1 is found on sourceforge but you may have installed msys when the mirrors were pointed at a temporary location. I believe repo.msys2.org/mingw/ is preferred these days but downloads ... sourceforge should be the same: greg@linux-gc09:/c/msys64/etc

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-23 08:19- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, Greg, > It looks like the whole list I get is out-of-date - several other packages in > my list that I checked have a lower version number too. The repositories that > seem to be checked (assuming the files "mirrorlist.* are indeed used fo

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

lot development list > Subject: RE: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin > > On 2016-03-23 07:40- Arjen Markus wrote: > > >> AM: Two odd things here: > >>> 1. You get a report on CMake 3.4.1, whereas I only got 3.3.1 (see > >>>

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-23 07:40- Arjen Markus wrote: >> AM: Two odd things here: >>> 1. You get a report on CMake 3.4.1, whereas I only got 3.3.1 (see the list >>> in my follow-up mail) @Arjen: Your 3.3.1 result is inconsistent with the raw list of packages that are available at

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Greg, From: Greg Jung [mailto:gvj...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:58 PM To: Arjen Markus Cc: Alan W. Irwin; PLplot development list Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin Hi Arjen, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Arjen Markus wrote: Hi Alan

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Arjen, On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > > (priority 1) I tried to install CMake for MinGW-w64/MSYS2, but that failed: > > -According to the package manager there is a version 3.3.1, but > on installing it naively (via pacman –S cmake), I got CMak

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, (priority 1) I tried to install CMake for MinGW-w64/MSYS2, but that failed: -According to the package manager there is a version 3.3.1, but on installing it naively (via pacman -S cmake), I got CMake 3.2.3. -Explicitly installing the package that seems to represent ve

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin --octave-4

On 2016-03-17 08:57- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> >> Ib. disabling octave >> >> There has been no recent PLplot work on the octave binding so you may have to >> keep that disabled. It appears th

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-17 14:30- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:03 PM >> To: Arjen Markus >> Cc: PLplot development list >> Subject: RE: comprehensive testing results on Cygwi

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin - Ada build errors

Hi Alan, Stupid mistake of mine: the current version of the GCC compiler is 4.9.3 and my script had a reference to 4.9.2. After correcting that the Ada binding could be enabled as far as that was concerned, however I get build errors: [ 39%] Linking Ada executable x00a.exe cd /cygdrive/d/

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > The current results do look good, but I would like to review again the > motivation for > the following constraints on this comprehensive test because it has been a > while > since you last made a

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin - Ada build errors

On 2016-03-17 09:13- Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > Stupid mistake of mine: the current version of the GCC compiler is 4.9.3 and my script had a reference to 4.9.2. After correcting that the Ada binding could be enabled as far as that was concerned, however I get build errors: [...] Please

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > I. --cmake_added_options "-DENABLE_ada=OFF -DENABLE_octave=OFF" > > Ia. disabling of Ada > > Please do not disable Ada. I worked hard on that language support during this > release cycle (see 2.2 i

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin - Ada build errors

Hi Alan, Arjen Markus Sr. Adviseur/Onderzoeker T +31(0)88335 8559 E arjen.mar...@deltares.nl [Logo] www.deltares.com Postbus 177 2600 MH Delft [Deltares Twitter] [Deltares LinkedIn]

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

And now with the tar file I promised. Regards, Arjen From: Arjen Markus [mailto:arjen.mar...@deltares.nl] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:58 AM To: Alan W. Irwin Cc: PLplot development list Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin Hi Alan, > -Origi

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > Ib. disabling octave > > There has been no recent PLplot work on the octave binding so you may have to > keep that disabled. It appears that the octave-devel-4.0.0-3 package is > available > for

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin

On 2016-03-16 11:45- Arjen Markus wrote: > In the attachment you'll find the results for the complete set of tests on > Cygwin. It is looking quite good now. Hi Arjen: The current results do look good, but I would like to review again the motivation for the following constraints on this com

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > Thanks for that explanation of the concise versus expanded error messages. > It still > leaves two big question though which is why the artificial error in > Tcl_GetMatrixPtr > generated by my l

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

On 2016-03-16 08:04- Arjen Markus wrote: >> So for this case it appears there are consistent >> >> Matrix operator "x" already in use >> >> basic error messages between the two methods. but that basic error message is >> not at all consistent with the above naive interpretation of what should

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] ... > > [...] > > *** PLPLOT WARNING *** > > plmaptex is a no-op because shapelib is not available. > > No matrix operator named "62" > > > > So from that last line I am pretty sure that the "62" in >

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

On 2016-03-14 17:34-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > [...] > *** PLPLOT WARNING *** > plmaptex is a no-op because shapelib is not available. > No matrix operator named "62" > > So from that last line I am pretty sure that the "62" in > > $w cmd plmaptex {} "ss/ss64ne_General_Text" 1.0 0.0 0.5 > "Caffy

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

Hi Alan, > -Original Message- > From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca] > > And after a lot of complaints about shapelib being missing I ran into the > following > peculiar matrix operator message: > > [...] > *** PLPLOT WARNING *** > plmaptex is a no-op because shapelib

Re: [Plplot-devel] comprehensive testing results on Cygwin [POSSIBLE SOLUTION?]

On 2016-03-14 14:58-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: > I am going to follow up by trying some valgrind runs on Linux for > example 19 without shapelib and for both Tcl and C to see if valgrind > can spot the fundamental memory management issue that is causing the > segfault for your particular (Cygwin) c