Hi Werner,
It's not a fundamental problem with gdc. As I say, the 4.3 version on my
updated Ubuntu lucid system works (albeit 32 bit).
gdc is the default d compiler on Debian and Ubuntu. If it turns out that
certain versions don't work then we should warn people and test for them.
I'd like
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Hazen, Andrew, and I have worked on this issue off list and
here is the current status:
Hazen gets inconsistently bad results for qt devices for Qt-4.5.1 and also
for Qt-4.6.2. The inconsistency is that the errors do not appear for the
same C
examples for repeat runs
On 2010-05-27 09:56- andrewr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 11026
http://plplot.svn.sourceforge.net/plplot/?rev=11026view=rev
Author: andrewross
Date: 2010-05-27 09:56:37 + (Thu, 27 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
A load of little changes to tcl
On 2010-05-27 14:21+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
Hi Werner,
It's not a fundamental problem with gdc. As I say, the 4.3 version on my
updated Ubuntu lucid system works (albeit 32 bit).
gdc is the default d compiler on Debian and Ubuntu. If it turns out that
certain versions don't work then we
On 2010-05-27 12:03-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
Following your suggestion I simplified the test to the following:
#!/bin/sh
LIMIT=2000
for((a=1; a= LIMIT; a++))
do
examples/c/x10c -dev pngqt -o test.png
#examples/c/x26c -dev pngqt -o test.png -fam
echo -n $a
done
For what it
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:06:35AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2010-05-27 09:56- andrewr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 11026
http://plplot.svn.sourceforge.net/plplot/?rev=11026view=rev
Author: andrewross
Date: 2010-05-27 09:56:37 + (Thu, 27 May 2010)
Log
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00:32PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2010-05-27 12:03-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
Following your suggestion I simplified the test to the following:
#!/bin/sh
LIMIT=2000
for((a=1; a= LIMIT; a++))
do
examples/c/x10c -dev pngqt -o test.png
#examples/c/x26c
On 2010-05-27 20:22+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:00:32PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
On 2010-05-27 12:03-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
Following your suggestion I simplified the test to the following:
#!/bin/sh
LIMIT=2000
for((a=1; a= LIMIT; a++))
do
examples/c/x10c
On 2010-05-27 20:29+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
Hi Andrew:
I do like this restoration of defaults, because the bad-looking results for
test_interactive (implemented in examples/tk/standard_examples(.in) were
annoying. But these changes will mess up the good agreement with the C
examples for
On 2010-05-27 15:49-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
1. test hangs at iteration 991
2. close Firefox
3. test finishes iteration 991 and now hangs at 992.
That is a most interesting result. The only way I can think of for
the two to interact that way is via consuming some X resource so I am glad
you
Andrew Ross wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:49:22PM -0400, Hazen Babcock wrote:
It really looks to me like it is consuming some finite system resource.
As I mentioned before the test will hang at the call to QApplication.
What I have now discovered however, is that if I close another GUI
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2010-05-27 20:22+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
That's a possibility, but it still seems quite unlikely. Qt is very
widely
used, even with GNOME and I've not seen any reports of this. By the way
I'm also using KDE though.
I agree. However, a much more likely possibility
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:39:55PM -0400, Hazen Babcock wrote:
Andrew Ross wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:49:22PM -0400, Hazen Babcock wrote:
Are we sure that we are closing the QApplication properly?
I think so, although most programs would only create a QApplication once
at the
Hi Andrew:
On 2010-05-27 21:11+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
While running test_interactive on my Ubuntu Lucid system I noticed that
for tk example xtk04 the colour contour fill plot does not display any
colour shading at all. This example uses itcl / itk and this is the
first time for a while
Bugs item #3008204, was opened at 2010-05-27 23:11
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by andrewross
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=102915aid=3008204group_id=2915
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
On 2010-05-27 22:58+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:39:55PM -0400, Hazen Babcock wrote:
Andrew Ross wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:49:22PM -0400, Hazen Babcock wrote:
Are we sure that we are closing the QApplication properly?
I think so, although most programs would
On 2010-05-27 16:59-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Hazen, have you double-checked yet that isGUI is false for your latest
tests? Of course, even if isGUI is false, QApplication may
partially or totally ignore that so it still may be using up some X resource
shared with firefox. Alternatively,
17 matches
Mail list logo
