I wonder if someone could take a look at the API documentation for pllegend
which has some problems. For example, the parameter position is not described
at all, and the parameters bg_color, bb_style, nrow, ncolumn all have the same
description.
Also, the Ada bindings are sensitive to whether
Hi Alan,
I have tested example 27 on Windows and it is looking very nice now.
With and without -eofill.
The Tcl version is still a bit awkward - it produces a PostScript
file that is ten times too large - but it seems fine on the screen.
Regards,
Arjen
On 2011-03-04 22:30, Alan W. Irwin wrote
On 2011-03-08 13:09+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> I have tested example 27 on Windows and it is looking very nice now.
> With and without -eofill.
>
> The Tcl version is still a bit awkward - it produces a PostScript
> file that is ten times too large - but it seems fine on the screen.
On 2011-03-06 19:58-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Alan W. Irwin
> wrote:
>> Here is the latest (revision 11607) diff report that tracks how well
>> we have propagated C example changes to other languages.
>>
>
>>
>> I have excluded OCaml from the above because
In addition to the recent Tcl and OCaml progress, there has also been
some progress with D (revision 11612) to straighten out the
example 18 issue in that case. So here is the latest status report for
the remaining non-clean languages:
octave
Missing examples: 19
Differing posts
Hi Jerry:
I have changed the subject line because after giving the (short)
answer to your question I am evolving this discussion into a different
direction that deserves a separate subject line.
On 2011-03-08 02:51-0700 Jerry wrote:
> I wonder if someone could take a look at the API documentatio
On 2011-03-06 19:58-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> OCaml should be matching more closely now:
Hi Hez:
The C implementation of the range adjustment sucked in an obvious way
so I had to change it and all other implementations of example 27
including the OCaml one. Since I am floundering around w
On 2011-03-08 11:54-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I think cleaning up our libplplot interface by using the const
> modifier for arrays whenever appropriate would be a good idea.
> Obviously this change would require substantial propagation effort,
> and might even require a soversion bump (if it con
Hi Alan,
On 2011-03-08 19:07, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 13:09+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> I have tested example 27 on Windows and it is looking very nice now.
>> With and without -eofill.
>>
>> The Tcl version is still a bit awkward - it produces a PostScript
>> file t
On Tuesday, March 8, 2011 at 19:58:26 (-0800) Alan W. Irwin writes:
> I have already had one positive response off-list from Andrew on this
> question so I have decided to start the process to see how far I can
> get.
I just *have* to post the const-nazi bit here. Apologies to anyone who is
of
10 matches
Mail list logo
