Its not even clear if that is particularly useful. Its not difficult to match
similar browsing habits across multiple systems that don’t share login
information. Companies are interested in this so they can ensure they are
targeting the correct user when an IP address may not be specific enough
without knowing more about what makes him think his email is being given
out, it's hard to say what caused it, because theres lots of levels this,
or phenomena similar enough to be confused with actual distribution, can
happen on.
it could be someone licensing a third party mailing list, like a
On 02/03/2018 11:00 AM, plug-requ...@pdxlinux.org wrote:
He clarified a symptom I hadn't caught before.
He is getting his mail without signing in to his gmail account.
He is now using Windows 10. He did not have this problem when he was
using Windows 7.
I'm not sure if you've ever done paid
I'm not sure if I missed it, however am still struggling to understand his
email "publication" part.
We're somewhat veering towards privacy vs security and this will be indeed
an endless debate.
By viewing YouTube contents, you already have agreed to some level of use
of content terms.
You
On 02/02/2018 06:33 PM, plug-requ...@pdxlinux.org wrote:
If anyone can suggest how I could better handle this -- public or
private responses requested.
I'd tell you brother to start here =>
That separate accounts will work only until someone who knows him will
email him or view his FB page.
Real privacy online is probably possible for a limited time, but
extraordinarily difficult. It is definitely beyond keeping the private time
useful.
T
On Feb 2, 2018 6:06 PM, "Michael Barnes"
Clicking on a link in a YouTube video could get that type of information to
a source that could/would use it,
as the link could take you off the youtube site completely.
Any site that he connects can collect any information that the browser has
configured as to his identity.
Also without any
On 02/02/2018 08:06 PM, Michael Barnes wrote:
In short, there is no such thing as privacy on the internet, period. If he
wants to look at anything anywhere on the internet, any information on his
computer is subject to retrieval. I would suggest he acquire a separate
computer (preferably running
On 02/02/2018 07:36 PM, Dick Steffens wrote:
On 02/02/2018 05:11 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 02/02/2018 06:21 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
He suspects they have been publishing his email address.
Please elaborate.
I would if I could.
I b geek -- he not
He has associated the publication of
On 02/02/2018 05:11 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 02/02/2018 06:21 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
He suspects they have been publishing his email address.
Please elaborate.
I would if I could.
I b geek -- he not
He has associated the publication of his email address with videos he
has viewed.
On 02/02/2018 06:21 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
He suspects they have been publishing his email address.
Please elaborate.
I would if I could.
I b geek -- he not
He has associated the publication of his email address with videos he
has viewed.
I *EMPHATICALLY AVOID* social media
What
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore
> On Feb 2, 2018, at 6:21 PM, Carl Karsten wrote:
>
>> He suspects they have been publishing his email address.
>
> Please elaborate.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>>
Called my brother to wish him a "Happy Birthday".
As I'm the geek sibling, he asked a geek type question.
He has been viewing youtube(sp?) videos.
He suspects they have been publishing his email address.
He objects.
I asked about contact info in the "privacy" statement - he found none.
I have no
13 matches
Mail list logo