Re: [PLUG] Having trouble with MS-DFS still...

2018-04-04 Thread Tyrell Jentink
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 11:08 michael wrote: > I have one instance of Windows Server 2012 R2 180 day trial running in > Virtualbox > on top of CentOS 7. > That should work... Do I need two to three instances of Windows 2012 R2 to implement DFS > properly? Probably not for the tests you are runni

Re: [PLUG] Name resolution.

2018-04-04 Thread michael
On 2018-04-04 15:20, michael wrote: I have a private RFC1918 network with a private DNS server on it on a CentOS 7 based server that can resolve Internet names as well. There are a bunch of Windows machines and the server hooked to a Netgear Nighthawk wireless router. It points at nameservers o

Re: [PLUG] Name resolution.

2018-04-04 Thread Jim Garrison
On 4/4/2018 1:20 PM, michael wrote: > I have a private RFC1918 network with a private DNS server on it on a > CentOS 7 based server that can resolve Internet names as well. > > There are a bunch of Windows machines and the server hooked to a Netgear > Nighthawk wireless router.  It points at names

[PLUG] Name resolution.

2018-04-04 Thread michael
I have a private RFC1918 network with a private DNS server on it on a CentOS 7 based server that can resolve Internet names as well. There are a bunch of Windows machines and the server hooked to a Netgear Nighthawk wireless router. It points at nameservers out on the Internet that don't have

Re: [PLUG] Having trouble with MS-DFS still...

2018-04-04 Thread michael
I have one instance of Windows Server 2012 R2 180 day trial running in Virtualbox on top of CentOS 7. Do I need two to three instances of Windows 2012 R2 to implement DFS properly? There are plenty of Windows 10 computers in the office, can the DFS server reference a single share across two