Re: [pmacct-discussion] aggregate-filter min packet count and bgp sql table questions

2010-03-11 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Brent, Thanks very much for the feedback. I've just corrected the issue and will commit it to the CVS shortly later today. Cheers, Paolo On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:26:57AM -0800, Brent Van Dussen wrote: Paolo - Just tried to build the latest CVS version and am getting compile errors

Re: [pmacct-discussion] aggregate-filter min packet count and bgp sql table questions

2010-03-11 Thread Brent Van Dussen
Thanks Paololooks like our dst_mask is showing up now in the memory tables! (sql way too slow and IO constrained) I wanted to ask about these messages we're getting in the logs now that we're using mem tables: WARN ( prefixes/memory ): Unable to allocate more memory pools, clear

Re: [pmacct-discussion] aggregate-filter min packet count and bgp sql table questions

2010-03-11 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Brent, On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:01:26AM -0800, Brent Van Dussen wrote: I wanted to ask about these messages we're getting in the logs now that we're using mem tables: WARN ( prefixes/memory ): Unable to allocate more memory pools, clear stats manually! WARN ( as_path/memory ):

Re: [pmacct-discussion] aggregate-filter min packet count and bgp sql table questions

2010-03-11 Thread Brent Van Dussen
Good news, no longer getting the errors and my system hasn't fallen on its face yet. Also have 2-3x more entries in the memory tables so that's excellent as well. My next question is regarding aging of entries in the memory table, how is this done? At first I checked one of the tables