Hi Brent,

Thanks very much for the feedback. I've just corrected the issue
and will commit it to the CVS shortly later today. 

Cheers,
Paolo


On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:26:57AM -0800, Brent Van Dussen wrote:
> Paolo -
>
> Just tried to build the latest CVS version and am getting compile errors 
> when configure option "--disable-l2" is used.  When I re-configured 
> without it everything builds fine.
>
> Here's the error I get:
>
> -bash-3.2$ make
> Making all in src
> gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/bvd/pmacct-cvs/pmacct/src'
> Making all in nfprobe_plugin
> gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/bvd/pmacct-cvs/pmacct/src/ 
> nfprobe_plugin'
> gcc -DPACKAGE=\"pmacctd\" -DVERSION=\"0.12.1-cvs\" -DPROGNAME=1 - 
> DIM_LITTLE_ENDIAN=1 -DHAVE_PCAP_H=1 -DHAVE_LIBPCAP=1 -DPCAP_7=1 - 
> DPCAP_TYPE_linux=1 -DHAVE_DLOPEN=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_WAIT_H=1 
> -DHAVE_GETOPT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 
> -DHAVE_U_INT64_T=1 -DHAVE_U_INT32_T=1 -DHAVE_U_INT16_T=1 
> -DHAVE_U_INT8_T=1 -DENABLE_THREADS=1 -DRETSIGTYPE=void -DHAVE_VSNPRINTF=1 
>  -I. -I.. -O2  -DFLOW_SPLAY            -DEXPIRY_RB               -c -o 
> nfprobe_plugin.o 
> nfprobe_plugin.c
> nfprobe_plugin.c: In function ???l2_to_flowrec???:
> nfprobe_plugin.c:312: error: ???p??? undeclared (first use in this  
> function)
> nfprobe_plugin.c:312: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported  
> only once
> nfprobe_plugin.c:312: error: for each function it appears in.)
> gmake[2]: *** [nfprobe_plugin.o] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bvd/pmacct-cvs/pmacct/src/ 
> nfprobe_plugin'
> gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bvd/pmacct-cvs/pmacct/src'
> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>
> Should be able to let you know shortly how the prefix length feature  
> works.
>
> Thanks,
> -Brent
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Brent Van Dussen wrote:
>
>> Thanks for getting this set up Paolo!
>>
>> We'll get the latest CVS version loaded and tested this week to  
>> provide feedback.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Brent
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2010, at 1:34 AM, Paolo Lucente wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Brent, All,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:05:20AM +0000, Paolo Lucente wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Would it also be possible to have the dst_net appended with mask  
>>>>> length
>>>>> and a slightly larger DB field to accomodate it?   
>>>>> 255.255.255.255/25
>>>>> would be a CHAR(18) instead of CHAR(15) but it would be really  
>>>>> nice to
>>>>> have this information from BGP or the sflow prefix field added in 
>>>>> so a
>>>>> network map isn't needed.
>>>>
>>>> Netmasks. They are not there but i've recently received two more
>>>> requests in a row for such a feature. All coming from people making
>>>> use of the BGP feature. Hence, this is on my todo list and will
>>>> appear very soon - would say roughly 3-4 weeks. Would such approx
>>>> timeline match your expectations?
>>>
>>> To say at this propo that network masks have now been implemented
>>> as aggregation primitives. It's all published in the CVS. Network
>>> masks lie in a different field from the IP prefix - so that this
>>> implementation can get handy for other, ie. statistical, purposes.
>>> Indeed, SQL language manipulation can be used to merge masks and
>>> IP prefixes together on output.
>>>
>>> Also, good property of this way of proceeding is that by keeping
>>> masks in a separate field, they can be defined as INT(1) which is
>>> space-savy compared to a string representation within the IP prefix
>>> field. I already see this argument will not particularly impress
>>> the PosgreSQL friends but it's done for the sake of selecting a
>>> generic approach (not all RDBMS packages have the luxury of 'inet'
>>> types ...).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pmacct-discussion mailing list
>>> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pmacct-discussion mailing list
>> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
>

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to