Hi Yann,
For applications, you can rely on the built-in correlation mechanism.
You may run in the same issue, yes; your feedback would be valuable in
seeing how wide-spreaded is the issue. This used to work.
For interfaces, confirm such correlation is not currently supported; if
possible, could
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for the reply. I'm not doing anything too fancy, only
correlating two types of fields: Interfaces and Applications.
- For applications, I'm using the same fields than Gilad in the
GitHub issue, except that I'm doing the correlation in post
processing. Since we are both using Ci
Hi Yann,
Great point. There are a very few cases where pmacct does the magics of
correlating actual data to options on your behalf, ie. sampling rate and
application ID. So, given the current functionality, it sounds you are
doing the right thing saving both and correlating it afterwards as part
