Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
On 8 April 2018 at 21:31, Matthew Brincke wrote: > I mean the patches 04/13, 10/13 and 13/13 which I didn't review yet. > I think they are fine, Thank you for spotting these! Yes, those were small API additions and they weren't reviewed. I don't want to put any pressure at this stage: it's same for me if they are reviewed and included (if they are OK) after 0.9.6. Cheers, Francesco -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
Hello Francesco, hello all, > On 08 April 2018 at 21:16 Francesco Pretto wrote: > > > On 8 April 2018 at 21:06, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > > Could you please consider the following: I don't think the project should > > punish > > Francesco Pretto by rejection of his not-yet-reviewed patches submitted on > > February 22, > > > > Matthew, don't worry: I think I got enough review for the patches I > posted. Some were included but others won't be applied and on those I > got enough explanation (I already know some were possibly > controversial). If I think some of those patches still deserve to be > included, I will post them updated at a later stage. I mean the patches 04/13, 10/13 and 13/13 which I didn't review yet. I think they are fine, I just would have liked to commit a fix to the bug mentioned in the thread "[Podofo-users] BUG: Erase method from PdfOutlineItem sometimes segfaults" first, which I'm still having problems with ;-( (mainly with how I should test it and what should be done in release vs. debug mode). I certainly didn't intend to exclude these patches from the upcoming release by the passage of time until the release candidate comes out. I'm very sorry for that if they don't get an exception from the "only critical ones now" rule (as they're very simple I think). > > Cheers, > Francesco Best regards, mabri -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
Hi all! I definitly did not want punish Francesco or deliberately not include his patches! But I hope you all know this :-) The main goal of this long awaited release candidate was to get some more speed into PoDoFo again and think that was achieved. Today we found and fixed already an i386 compilation error and an error with doxygen documentation generation. I am also looking forward to the build results from debian experimental! Regarding the patches: If Matthew finds some time to review and include some more patches, which are considered important, I will happily prepare another release candidate. @Matthew, Francesco: Is there anything particular important which we should include into the release? Are you able to integrate some more stuff until next Friday? Then I would try to prepare 0.9.6-rc2 next Friday? Best regards, Dominik On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Francesco Pretto wrote: > On 8 April 2018 at 21:06, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > > > Could you please consider the following: I don't think the project > should punish > > Francesco Pretto by rejection of his not-yet-reviewed patches submitted > on February 22, > > > > Matthew, don't worry: I think I got enough review for the patches I > posted. Some were included but others won't be applied and on those I > got enough explanation (I already know some were possibly > controversial). If I think some of those patches still deserve to be > included, I will post them updated at a later stage. > > Cheers, > Francesco > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Podofo-users mailing list > Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
On 8 April 2018 at 21:06, Matthew Brincke wrote: > > Could you please consider the following: I don't think the project should > punish > Francesco Pretto by rejection of his not-yet-reviewed patches submitted on > February 22, > Matthew, don't worry: I think I got enough review for the patches I posted. Some were included but others won't be applied and on those I got enough explanation (I already know some were possibly controversial). If I think some of those patches still deserve to be included, I will post them updated at a later stage. Cheers, Francesco -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
Hello Dominik, hello all, > On 08 April 2018 at 14:12 Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users > wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6-rc1.tar.gz/download > thank you, Dominik, for preparing and uploading the release candidate tarball. > > Only critical patches will be integrated before release from now on. Could you please consider the following: I don't think the project should punish Francesco Pretto by rejection of his not-yet-reviewed patches submitted on February 22, for the project's inaction (including mine, which I beg your pardon for) in not reviewing and committing them (they're convenient API additions). I would commit and review them today. Can patches be committed now which aren't for the release? Thanks in advance. > > Best regards, > Dominik > Best regards, mabri -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 05:26:45PM +0200, Dominik Seichter wrote: > I committed a fix as revision 1915 to trunk. I hope this fixes the build > error. Could you please verify this? I do not have an i386 system arround. Yes, with that it builds correctly, thank you! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
Sure! Thanks, committed as revision 1916. Best regards, Dominik On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Dominik Seichter via > Podofo-users wrote: > > The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/ > 0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6-rc1.tar.gz/download > > > > Only critical patches will be integrated before release from now on. > > Not critical, but I'd fine nice if you could fix these last few spelling > errors :) > > Patch attached! > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
Hi,
I committed a fix as revision 1915 to trunk. I hope this fixes the build
error. Could you please verify this? I do not have an i386 system arround.
Thanks && Best regards,
Dominik
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Dominik Seichter via
> Podofo-users wrote:
> > The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here:
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/
> 0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6-rc1.tar.gz/download
> >
> > Only critical patches will be integrated before release from now on.
>
> Building it on i386 fails:
>
> [ 65%] Building CXX object test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-
> test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o
> cd "/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/obj-i686-linux-gnu/test/unit" &&
> /usr/lib/ccache/c++ -DPODOFO_HAVE_GCC_SYMBOL_VISIBILITY
> -I"/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/obj-i686-linux-gnu"
> -I"/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1" -I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu
> -I/usr/include/cppunit -I/usr/include/lua5.1
> -I"/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/src"
> -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/src -I/src/os -g -O2
> -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch-enum -Wcast-qual
> -Wwrite-strings -Wredundant-decls -Wreorder -Wno-deprecated-declarations
> -W -fvisibility=hidden -g -o CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o
> -c "/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp"
> /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp: In function 'void
> print(PoDoFo::pdf_utf16be*, PoDoFo::pdf_long)':
> /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:47:36: warning:
> format '%li' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 2 has type
> 'PoDoFo::pdf_long {aka int}' [-Wformat=]
> printf("start lLen=%li\n", lLen);
> ^
> In file included from /usr/include/cppunit/TestCase.h:6:0,
> from /usr/include/cppunit/TestCaller.h:5,
> from /usr/include/cppunit/extensions/HelperMacros.h:9,
> from /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/
> test/unit/StringTest.h:24,
> from /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/
> test/unit/StringTest.cpp:21:
> /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp: In member function
> 'void StringTest::TestLibUnistringInternal(const char*, long int, long
> int)':
> /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:73:5: error: no
> matching function for call to 'assertEquals(long int, PoDoFo::pdf_long&,
> CppUnit::SourceLine, const char [66])'
> CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer
> after utf8 -> utf16 conversion.", lLenUtf16 + 1, result1 );
> ^
> /usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: candidate: template T> void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, CppUnit::SourceLine,
> const string&)
> void assertEquals( const T& expected,
> ^~~~
> /usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: template argument
> deduction/substitution failed:
> /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:73:5: note: deduced
> conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('long int' and 'PoDoFo::pdf_long
> {aka int}')
> CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer
> after utf8 -> utf16 conversion.", lLenUtf16 + 1, result1 );
> ^
> /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:78:5: error: no
> matching function for call to 'assertEquals(long int, PoDoFo::pdf_long&,
> CppUnit::SourceLine, const char [74])'
> CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer
> after utf8 -> utf16 -> utf8 conversion.", lLenUtf8 + 1, result2 );
> ^
> /usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: candidate: template T> void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, CppUnit::SourceLine,
> const string&)
> void assertEquals( const T& expected,
> ^~~~
> /usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: template argument
> deduction/substitution failed:
> /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:78:5: note: deduced
> conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('long int' and 'PoDoFo::pdf_long
> {aka int}')
> CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer
> after utf8 -> utf16 -> utf8 conversion.", lLenUtf8 + 1, result2 );
> ^
> test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/build.make:377: recipe for target
> 'test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o' failed
> make[3]: *** [test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o]
> Error 1
>
>
> --
> regards,
> Mattia Rizzolo
>
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
> more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
> Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
>
--
Check out t
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users
wrote:
> The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6-rc1.tar.gz/download
>
> Only critical patches will be integrated before release from now on.
Not critical, but I'd fine nice if you could fix these last few spelling
errors :)
Patch attached!
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
--- a/src/doc/PdfAnnotation.cpp
+++ b/src/doc/PdfAnnotation.cpp
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
m_eAnnotation != ePdfAnnotation_Underline &&
m_eAnnotation != ePdfAnnotation_Squiggly &&
m_eAnnotation != ePdfAnnotation_StrikeOut )
-PODOFO_RAISE_ERROR_INFO( ePdfError_InternalLogic, "Must be a text markup annotation (hilight, underline, squiggly or strikeout) to set quad points" );
+PODOFO_RAISE_ERROR_INFO( ePdfError_InternalLogic, "Must be a text markup annotation (highlight, underline, squiggly or strikeout) to set quad points" );
this->GetObject()->GetDictionary().AddKey( "QuadPoints", rQuadPoints );
}
--- a/tools/podofoencrypt/podofoencrypt.cpp
+++ b/tools/podofoencrypt/podofoencrypt.cpp
@@ -92,9 +92,9 @@
printf(" -o The required owner password\n");
printf(" Permissions:\n");
printf(" --print Allow printing the document\n");
-printf(" --editAllow modifying the document besides annotations, form fields or chaning pages\n");
+printf(" --editAllow modifying the document besides annotations, form fields or changing pages\n");
printf(" --copyAllow text and graphic extraction\n");
-printf(" --editnotes Add or modify text annoations or form fields (if ePdfPermissions_Edit is set also allow to create interactive form fields including signature)\n");
+printf(" --editnotes Add or modify text annoations or form fields (if ePdfPermissions_Edit is set also allow the creation interactive form fields including signature)\n");
printf(" --fillandsign Fill in existing form or signature fields\n");
printf(" --accessible Extract text and graphics to support user with disabillities\n");
printf(" --assembleAssemble the document: insert, create, rotate delete pages or add bookmarks\n");
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
}
- printf("%s was sucessfully encrypted to: %s\n", pszInput, pszOutput );
+ printf("%s was successfully encrypted to: %s\n", pszInput, pszOutput );
return 0;
}
--- a/tools/podofoimgextract/podofoimgextract.cpp
+++ b/tools/podofoimgextract/podofoimgextract.cpp
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
nNum = extractor.GetNumImagesExtracted();
- printf("Extracted %i images sucessfully from the PDF file.\n", nNum );
+ printf("Extracted %i images successfully from the PDF file.\n", nNum );
return 0;
}
--- a/tools/podofopdfinfo/podofopdfinfo.cpp
+++ b/tools/podofopdfinfo/podofopdfinfo.cpp
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
}
-// std::cerr << "All information written sucessfully.\n" << std::endl << std::endl;
+// std::cerr << "All information written successfully.\n" << std::endl << std::endl;
return 0;
}
--- a/tools/podofouncompress/podofouncompress.cpp
+++ b/tools/podofouncompress/podofouncompress.cpp
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
*/
- printf("%s was sucessfully uncompressed to: %s\n", pszInput, pszOutput );
+ printf("%s was successfully uncompressed to: %s\n", pszInput, pszOutput );
return 0;
}
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users wrote: > The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6-rc1.tar.gz/download This tarball contains the following empty directories. Do you think it's feasible to not ship them? * doc/html/ * doc/latex/ * test/system/data/ -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
Re: [Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
[ Sorry Dominik for the double mail… used the wrong address for the ML ]
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Dominik Seichter via Podofo-users
wrote:
> The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6-rc1.tar.gz/download
Fails to build on i386:
[ 65%] Building CXX object test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o
cd "/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/obj-i686-linux-gnu/test/unit" &&
/usr/lib/ccache/c++ -DPODOFO_HAVE_GCC_SYMBOL_VISIBILITY
-I"/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/obj-i686-linux-gnu"
-I"/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1" -I/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu
-I/usr/include/cppunit -I/usr/include/lua5.1 -I"/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/src"
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/src -I/src/os -g -O2
-fdebug-prefix-map=/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1=. -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall
-Woverloaded-virtual -Wswitch-enum -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings
-Wredundant-decls -Wreorder -Wno-deprecated-declarations -W
-fvisibility=hidden -g -o CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o -c
"/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp"
/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp: In function 'void
print(PoDoFo::pdf_utf16be*, PoDoFo::pdf_long)':
/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:47:36: warning: format
'%li' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 2 has type
'PoDoFo::pdf_long {aka int}' [-Wformat=]
printf("start lLen=%li\n", lLen);
^
In file included from /usr/include/cppunit/TestCase.h:6:0,
from /usr/include/cppunit/TestCaller.h:5,
from /usr/include/cppunit/extensions/HelperMacros.h:9,
from /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.h:24,
from /build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:21:
/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp: In member function 'void
StringTest::TestLibUnistringInternal(const char*, long int, long int)':
/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:73:5: error: no matching
function for call to 'assertEquals(long int, PoDoFo::pdf_long&,
CppUnit::SourceLine, const char [66])'
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer after
utf8 -> utf16 conversion.", lLenUtf16 + 1, result1 );
^
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: candidate: template
void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, CppUnit::SourceLine, const
string&)
void assertEquals( const T& expected,
^~~~
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: template argument
deduction/substitution failed:
/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:73:5: note: deduced
conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('long int' and 'PoDoFo::pdf_long
{aka int}')
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer after
utf8 -> utf16 conversion.", lLenUtf16 + 1, result1 );
^
/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:78:5: error: no matching
function for call to 'assertEquals(long int, PoDoFo::pdf_long&,
CppUnit::SourceLine, const char [74])'
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer after
utf8 -> utf16 -> utf8 conversion.", lLenUtf8 + 1, result2 );
^
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: candidate: template
void CppUnit::assertEquals(const T&, const T&, CppUnit::SourceLine, const
string&)
void assertEquals( const T& expected,
^~~~
/usr/include/cppunit/TestAssert.h:127:6: note: template argument
deduction/substitution failed:
/build/libpodofo-0.9.6~rc1/test/unit/StringTest.cpp:78:5: note: deduced
conflicting types for parameter 'const T' ('long int' and 'PoDoFo::pdf_long
{aka int}')
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL_MESSAGE( "Comparing length of output buffer after
utf8 -> utf16 -> utf8 conversion.", lLenUtf8 + 1, result2 );
^
test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/build.make:377: recipe for target
'test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o' failed
make[3]: *** [test/unit/CMakeFiles/podofo-test.dir/StringTest.cpp.o] Error 1
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
[Podofo-users] PoDoFo 0.9.6-rc1 ready for download
Hi everybody, The first release candidate for PoDoFo 0.9.6 can be downloaded from here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/podofo/files/podofo/0.9.6/podofo-0.9.6-rc1.tar.gz/download Only critical patches will be integrated before release from now on. Best regards, Dominik -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
