[It's really difficult not to notice the core agenda driving Michael
Ledeen, is it -- he screams it at the world in a jumble of emotionally
excited and confused words. This guy is a militant ethnic nationalist,
promoting an ideology whose values, interests and objectives are
radically at odds with
[Notice the toilet imagery here, and check out recent posts on Little
Green Footballs and Atlas Shrugs angrily defending Stanislav
Shmulevich. Also check out Pamela Geller Oshry, with a stupid grin on
her face, giving Cindy Sheehan the finger in a photo she posts with
pride. There is a strong
[The neocon objective from the outset was to destroy Iraq, not to
bring democracy to the Middle East. The neocons despise democracy in
the United States and are working to destroy it -- why would they value
democracy in the Middle East or anywhere else in the world? They have
the mentality of KGB
[Follow the money; who benefits. Bloodletting in the Middle East is a
gold mine for the military-industrial complex -- blood translates to an
enormous transfer of wealth from the common wealth to the arms
manufacturers and dealers.]
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: U.S. announces
[Indispensable tool -- a Web-based Slickrun. The command line lives.]
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: YubNub via About Web
Search on Jul 30, 2007 YubNub is a treasury of user-submitted shortcuts
that enable you to search the Web more quickly and efficiently. I use
YubNub constantly
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: Was Pat Tillman
Murdered? Absulutely Yes, according to A Nam Vet via OpEdNews -
OpEdNews.Com Progressive, Tough Liberal News and Opinion on Jul 30,
2007 Bill Perry knows a lot about shooting people in the head. He did
it in Viet Nam, and he knows how
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: Coming of Age in Bush's
America! via TvNewsLIES.org by Reggie on Jul 30, 2007
By Reggie, Contributing Editor, TvNewsLIES.org
Imagine being on the brink of adolescence in the year 2000, - only
minimally aware of the world around you, and really not
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: Kombat Kagan via
ePluribus Media Community on Jul 30, 2007 Fred Kagan wants you to have
faith in the Iraq surge strategy. You might expect that he would.
Kagan is, after all, the strategy's chief architect. A darling of the
neoconservative elite,
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: Josh Marshall (Talking
Points Memo): As Bad as Bush via FAIR Media Views by Josh Marshall
(Talking Points Memo) on Jul 30, 2007 The blogger finds a
rare opportunit[y] for mirth in watching Fred Hiatt, czar of the
Washington Post editorial page, try
Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[The New York Times is an Israeli/neocon op, trying to pass itself off as a
liberal institution -- the algorithm couldn't be more simple.]
Elsewhere, Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, I never assert as fact that which isn't backed up by
I can think of six major items of proof off the top of my head:
1. A.M. Rosenthal
2. David Brooks
3. Judith Miller
4. Michael Gordon
5. Thomas Friedman
6. William Safire
The New York Times has prominently promoted the neoconservative agenda for
decades now, including most recently the Iraq War,
To understand just deep the anger against the New York Times runs in American
politics these days, follow the reaction in the blogosphere to the O'Hanlon and
Pollack article on Iraq:
Google Blog Search [New York Times Pollack]
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: The Sounds of Silence --
How Sweet It Would Be via Antiwar.com Blog by Justin Raimondo on Jul
30, 2007
Kenneth Pollack and Michael O'Hanlon, two top Democratic party foreign
policy mavens, were instrumental in bringing around the Democrats in
the
Sent to you by Sean McBride via Google Reader: Max Blumenthal via
Antiwar.com Blog by Scott Horton on Jul 30, 2007
Download audio file (07_07_30_blumenthal.mp3)
Max Blumenthal discusses the theology and politics of John Hagee's
Christians United for Israel as he documented for the Huffington
Still waiting for the irrefutable proof that The New York Times is an
Israeli/neocon op. I'm not sure how listing names amounts to irrefutable
proof that a major newspaper is an operation of a foreign government.
Sean McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can
Op doesn't mean a formal Israeli operation. What it means is that the New
York Times is obsessively preoccupied with the problems and interests of Israel
compared to those of other foreign governments around the world. This
obsession explains why it went along with neocon schemes for an Iraq
16 matches
Mail list logo