Re: [Pool] Faster NTP Pool website

2012-06-16 Thread Shoppa, Tim
Chuck, You know ntpd (via ntpq -c peers) does a dang good job of monitoring the statistics of your time sources. ntpq -c peers shows the sort of statistics that a long-lived client expects to be of high quality. Offset, delay, and jitter are very important to the ntpd algorithms, and it

Re: [Pool] packet loss in IPv6 monitoring?

2012-06-16 Thread Wessel Nieboer
Op 16-6-2012 21:01, Maurice Janssen schreef: Hi, I have three servers in the pool, one of them can be reached over IPv4 and IPv6, the others only over IPv6. So on my manage servers page, four hosts are listed (1 x IPv4 and 3 x IPv6). The score for the IPv4 host is a steady 20, no packet

Re: [Pool] packet loss in IPv6 monitoring?

2012-06-16 Thread Svavar Kjarrval
I have a server in the UK which has both IPv4 and IPv6. There's not packet loss on IPv4 but there is with the IPv6 one. This is the same instance of NTPd so it's extremely unlikely it has anything to do with the server itself. - Svavar On 16/06/12 19:01, Maurice Janssen wrote: Hi, I have

Re: [Pool] Faster NTP Pool website

2012-06-16 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jun 16, 2012, at 18:07, Chuck wrote: Hi Chuck, Feedback is always welcome; I don't get a lot so it's easy for me to end up thinking that exposing the monitoring data that powers the system is just for my own amusement. Thanks! The same as the rest of you, I am with limited time and