mplayer in fullscreen blocks Xorg

2008-12-20 Thread Sebastian Rother
If you watch a movie with mplayer in fullscreen and you pause it (in fullcreen) for lets say 2 hours and you come back and simply press the spacebar I face the problem that the sounds goes on but the pictures don't. If I switch to console and back the whole screen (in Xorg) is black (sound still

License of installed ports

2008-12-20 Thread Sebastian Rother
Dear po...@-mailinglist, I noticed during using gentoo linux that gentoo (and some others) store a copy of the license file a programm refers to at the local HDD. By this I mean that if 30 packages are GPLed the GPL gets installed one time at the HDD. I am unsure about the OpenBSD Port-System

Re: License of installed ports

2008-12-20 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:48:06 +0100 Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de wrote: On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:46:46PM +0100, Sebastian Rother wrote: As I did find /usr -name *GPL* only one file was found (installed by qt3 in /usr/local/share/doc/qt3/LICENSE.GPL). $ find /usr/local -type f

db v4 Update: java-depency 1.4 - 1.7

2008-12-08 Thread Sebastian Rother
During the compilation of openoffice3 (wich still runs) I noticed that OpenOffice and db v4 still have a old Java depency. After installing jre 1.7 via packages I switched db v4 to jre 1.7 and it compiled fine and I noticed no issues yes. This was tested on -current using i386/mp. I applied the

transmission-1.22 on OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 fails to install (not build)

2008-09-09 Thread Sebastian Rother
Transmission fails to build (no matter if with or without X) on my OpenBSD 4.4-stable amd64. Compiling works but I get this error during the package installation. === Building package for transmission-gui-1.22 Create /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/transmission-gui-1.22.tgz Link to

Re: transmission-1.22 on OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 fails to install (not build)

2008-09-09 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:29:53 +0200 Sebastian Rother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Transmission fails to build (no matter if with or without X) on my OpenBSD 4.4-stable amd64. Compiling works but I get this error during the package installation. === Building package for transmission-gui-1.22

Re: transmission-1.22 on OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 fails to install (not build)

2008-09-09 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:14:36 +0200 viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:29:53PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote: Transmission fails to build (no matter if with or without X) on my OpenBSD 4.4-stable amd64. Compiling works but I get this error during the package

Re: transmission-1.22 on OpenBSD 4.4 amd64 fails to install (not build)

2008-09-09 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 23:59:52 +0100 Federico G. Schwindt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:50:31PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote: On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 22:29:53 +0200 Sebastian Rother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Transmission fails to build (no matter if with or without X

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Rother
Theo wrote: Yes, and sometimes tough love is required. Perhaps whoever the maintainer is will merge this in time. Perhaps not. Let me pose a question: Would you rather have a good release that has good quality integration between packages or One that has the latest python? Let

Re: only days left to ports lock (4.4 release)

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Rother
Look, I'm going to side with Theo on that one. There are lots of *big* issues to fix each release. It doesn't look like it from outside, but we have show-stoppers. Each release, we refine the process. This release, we cut down on the number of non-critical commits right up to the lock.

Re: kqemu unstable on current

2008-07-31 Thread Sebastian Rother
Hi, Gallon Sylvestre schrieb: I've got the same problem with a macbook and the current GENERIC.MP. Already had that issue with the 4.3 MP kernel. AFAIK it is not something new. At least I never managed to get qemu run stable with kqemu loaded when also using a MP kernel. Only works

FF 2 || FF 3?

2008-07-17 Thread Sebastian Rother
Hi everybody, this is no request nor bagging. I just read a lot about FF3 and the chance getting it imported. Still I'd like to point out that FF 2.0.16 is out and I'd like to know if FF2 gets updated or if the focus is on FF3 (wich also was updated by mozilla recently). If there are FF2 patches

Question related to the socks5-Port + fetchmail

2008-05-21 Thread sebastian . rother
I tried to compile fetchmail with socks5-support. During the FAQ it uses libsocks5 wich should ship with socks5 (I hope, dan't didn't shiped it or I was blind). Related to the Makefile of the socks5-Port it is commercial and I should fetch the source manualy. I tried but I can't reach NEC to

Re: Question related to the socks5-Port + fetchmail

2008-05-21 Thread sebastian . rother
On 2008/05/21 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has the same version-number and co and during SGI it's not commercial but Freeware. It is on a website named freeware.sgi.com, but that means nothing. Here's an excerpt from the license: 3. You may not copy and distribute the Software nor

Menpower/testing needed to update Ports for 4.2?

2007-11-16 Thread sebastian . rother
Hi everybody, Just wanna know if I could help out to get some ports updated. I just wanna name some Ports who are propably in use by many users out there (all Ports I list here do have sec. problems): - flac (1.2.1 is avaiable for current and fixes the Bufferoverflows) - xvid (well 1.0.3 is in

nmap in 4.1 is brocken: no route to host if sudo is used

2007-04-22 Thread Sebastian Rother
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-04-22 15:30 CEST caught SIGINT signal, cleaning up $ sudo nmap -P0 -sV 192.136.34.41 Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-04-22 15:30 CEST WARNING: Unable to find appropriate interface for system route to

Re: nmap in 4.1 is brocken: no route to host if sudo is used

2007-04-22 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:32:45 +0200 Sebastian Rother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-04-22 15:30 CEST caught SIGINT signal, cleaning up $ sudo nmap -P0 -sV 192.136.34.41 Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-04-22

Re: VLC coredumps on OpenBSD 4.1-Beta

2007-03-27 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:35:57 +0100 Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could send ports@ the output from this: gdb vlc vlc.core bt it's possibly a problem with VLC rather than the port, though, and if it can't be reproduced I'm not sure if you'll find somebody to look at it, I

Ports freezed but what`s about sec. updates?

2007-02-26 Thread Sebastian Rother
Is it the normal procedure that even security updates are delayed during the ports freeze for 4.1? I`ve PHP (5.2 already), Firefox (1.5.0.10) and ClamAV (0.90) in mind wich do fix security bugs. I just asked myself if those updates get delayed as well just because of the Ports-Freeze? Kind

Re: Ports freezed but what`s about sec. updates?

2007-02-26 Thread Sebastian Rother
If you look at the cvs tree you'll find Firefox is at version 2.0.0.1 and there's no tag for 4.1 yet. Didn't bother to check the others, figured you can look if your interested. While not answering your question directly, I think it points in the direction you should look. Jim Well that`s

oBSD 4.0 Ports are older then those for 3.9

2006-10-31 Thread sebastian . rother
Just an Example is Mozilla-Firefox!: For 4.0 the port is 3 months old. http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/www/mozilla-firefox/?only_with_tag=OPENBSD_4_0 Security update to mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.5. This update fixes multiple security... compared to 3.9 wich is 5 weeks old:

Re: OpenOffice source - Humppa.hu not avaiable

2006-10-27 Thread sebastian . rother
You are such a dumb cunt that I actually feel sorry for you. You and your retarded opinions are ready for some MirBSD usage. Haven't you figured out yet that the reason that no one likes you might be because of you? It is time for you to move on, really. Just fuck off, don't return and

Re: OpenOffice source - Humppa.hu not avaiable

2006-10-26 Thread sebastian . rother
On 25/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not avaiable (not even a mirror works here). I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had problems with screen on the other hand... -- viq

Re: OpenOffice source - Humppa.hu not avaiable

2006-10-26 Thread sebastian . rother
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not avaiable (not even a mirror works here). I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had problems with screen on the other hand... If you are going to have any luck with

Re: OpenOffice source - Humppa.hu not avaiable

2006-10-26 Thread sebastian . rother
Well right me if I`m wrong but OpenOffice IS in the Ports for OpenBSD 4.0 (i386 only). So shouldn`t I exspect a working port then?! No, but it's a bit out of the ordinary. In 4.0 the port was in the ports tree but NOT connected to the build. That is, in 4.0 the ports/editors/Makefile did

Re: OpenOffice source - Humppa.hu not avaiable

2006-10-26 Thread sebastian . rother
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0... Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0. Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree. -d Damien, briefly.. you`re talking junk. What did I do? I tried a Port of

Re: OpenOffice source - Humppa.hu not avaiable

2006-10-26 Thread sebastian . rother
You are the ignorant asshole, that's clear to everyone. I wonde rhow people do think about you then... ;] Why don't you just PLEASE LEAVE and find a project that will listen to you. NOONE here will ever do anything that you want, because there is a fundamental LACK OF RESPECT for ANYTHING

OpenOffice source - Humppa.hu not avaiable

2006-10-25 Thread sebastian . rother
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not avaiable (not even a mirror works here). It would be neat if that could get fixed. Btw: What about other update slike Firefox for 4.0?? Kind regards, Sebastian -- Don't buy anything from YeongYang. Their Computercases are

Re: obsulete ports.....?

2006-10-25 Thread sebastian . rother
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just wondered who`s still using PGP except of GnuPG wich is compatible (nd yupp, idea is free now...). So (because the ports hackatron is still n action (?)) I asked myself if some obsulate ports may could get kicked out. maybe we should get rid of some

Firefox - still 1.5.0.5 for 4.0

2006-10-01 Thread sebastian . rother
I justed wanted to point out that the firefox-port for 3.9 is updated but the port for 4.0 isn`t. It would be neat (because 4.0 is beta) if this would change. Kind regards, Sebastian

Why was the Openoffice-port dropped?!

2006-09-07 Thread Sebastian Rother
Hi everybody, I`ve installed OpenBSD 4.0 (snapshot) and searched in my Ports to find the Openoffice Port but I wasn`t able to find it even I`ve seen some commits some weks ago and even undeadly reported about it. Why was the port dropped?! Kind regards, Sebastian

/sysutils/daemontools - Empty

2006-09-07 Thread Sebastian Rother
If this port isn`t maintained then the directory should get removed. ports/sysutils/daemontools is Empty (has no Makefile nor distfile) Kind regards, Sebastian

Re: Why was the Openoffice-port dropped?!

2006-09-07 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:08:50 +0100 Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006/09/08 00:50, Sebastian Rother wrote: I`ve installed OpenBSD 4.0 (snapshot) and searched in my Ports to find the Openoffice Port but I wasn`t able to find it editors/openoffice. Thanks! cd usr/ports make

Re: rrdtool on a Server? :(

2006-06-29 Thread Sebastian Rother
You forgot the 'p' flag. After that I tried to install it again and I had succes but I got this error-message: server12 $ rrdtool rrdtool: can't load library 'libfreetype.so.13.1' Maybe you need to rerun ldconfig (which is executed at boot from /etc/rc). Yes that was the case.. I

rrdtool on a Server? :(

2006-06-28 Thread Sebastian Rother
Hello everybody, I tried to install rrdtools on a Server but I may failed (for sure). The Server ist a x86 (i386) with NO X-Server... As I noticed rrdtool needs X (wich is crazy, it does NOT need X on Linux nor fBSD). Well I fetched the x*-files and made a dirty install using: cd / tar xvfz

Re: Moz-Firefox-Update 1.5.0.4 for 3.9-STABLE (not just current?!)

2006-06-19 Thread sebastian . rother
Ups, forgot to commit the update. The package was already available, however. thanks, Nikolay Thanks for the fast correction Nikolay! :) Kind regards, Sebastian -- Don't buy anything from YeongYang. Their Computercases are expensiv, they WTX-powersuplies start burning and their support refuse

Moz-Firefox-Update 1.5.0.4 for 3.9-STABLE (not just current?!)

2006-06-18 Thread sebastian . rother
That`s a little request for anybody who has commit-access. Please release the Mozilla-Update (1.5.0.3 - 1.5.0.4) wich is in the Portstree for nearly 2 weeks (just for current) also for 3.9-STABLE. Thanks and kind regards, Sebastian

Re: [UPDATE] php5 to version 5.1.2 (IMPORTANT)

2006-05-04 Thread sebastian . rother
5.1.3 eerr. Meeep... 5.1.4. http://de2.php.net/get/php-5.1.4.tar.gz/from/a/mirror Will PHP become stable? Will any Portupdate ever get include the Ports-Tree before a new Update comes out? This any MANY other stuff you`ll see in the next episode of: Patchbusters Myth of the week: The

Re: Hm... nmap and foo - no_x11 wont work anyway with ports..?

2006-05-03 Thread sebastian . rother
there is no dependency mechanism for the base system, including X; it's assumed to be installed. That's not quite true any longer. These days, we do check WANTLIB at extract time too, and most ports depending on X11 also need some libraries from X Windows... That`s what I thought too and

Re: update: net/nmap

2006-05-03 Thread sebastian . rother
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:25:08AM -0400, Okan Demirmen wrote: tested on i386/amd64 only - needs at least a test on a big endian arch (my sparc64 is dead) As mentioned in a private e-mail: This seams to fix the confusion related to localhost. Tested on OpenBSD 3.9-stable (backported, *roftl*),

Can't get gettext installed via package on 3.9.

2006-05-02 Thread sebastian . rother
pkg_delete .libs-gettext-0.10.40p3 then try to install it. I had a familiar problem with a partitial installed package. Sebastian

Hm... nmap and foo - no_x11 wont work anyway with ports..?

2006-05-02 Thread sebastian . rother
I notice dit already in 3.7 and 3.8. if you`ve a Port (f.e. nmap) and you select the no_x11 FLavor then a depency wich needs X11 will get installed (at least the Portsystem tries to do so) anyway and breaks with the message that X isn`t installed. Is there any plan to respect (and fix?) this

Re: Hm... nmap and foo - no_x11 wont work anyway with ports..?

2006-05-02 Thread sebastian . rother
It must be the dsniff-Port I guess (I ran a script wich installs a lot tools). steven: Prebuild packages could contain maybe modified code... maybe. But if I use no_x11 I wonder why dsniff (I suspect it, db3-depency?!)) does not warn if you tell the ports-system that you wanna have the

Re: nmap - dev/bpf10 - How to add more /dev/bpf?

2006-04-30 Thread sebastian . rother
Not only are you stupid enough to actually do this, you share this information? I hope you do know that port scanning in some countries is illegal without prior written permission from the owner of the network. Marco: 1st: get a clue about laws BEFORE you blame me 2nd: Yes the question

Re: nmap - dev/bpf10 - How to add more /dev/bpf?

2006-04-30 Thread sebastian . rother
Maybe, as I asked, 'ping localhost' and 'route show' will shed some light on this. (The first, notably, will tell you what localhost resolves too; it seems that isn't 127.0.0.1/::1, or your routing table is busted, or something is really wrong...) Joachim Well everythign is

nmap - dev/bpf10 - How to add more /dev/bpf?

2006-04-29 Thread sebastian . rother
Well I seam to run too much scans so I get this error (btw: I just took the us-embassy for fun ;)) ) godfather $ sudo nmap -P0 -sV -sS -vvv berlin.usembassy.gov Starting Nmap 3.95 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-04-30 07:40 CEST Initiating SYN Stealth Scan against 212.243.221.223 [1670

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2006-02-10 Thread Sebastian Rother
Seams version 4.01 of nmap fixes some bugy related to DNS and co. Maybe, because nmap is widely used, it could be the only exception and get integrated into 3.9. And here are the changes since 4.00: o Fixed a bug that would cause bogus reverse-DNS resolution on big-endian machines. Thanks to

Sylpheed: bind: Permission denied

2006-01-01 Thread Sebastian Rother
Sorry for the post. A Script I wrote hat a wrong chmod so the permissions for /tmp where wrong. Sorry.. Kind regards, Sebastian

Requested: John-Update to 1.6.40

2005-12-18 Thread Sebastian Rother
Hello everybody, Solar told me that a Portmaintainer helped him too to improve JtR. 1.6.40 is out now so I would request a Port-Update. I don#t know who should have helped him because the JtR-Port has no maintainer so if this anonymous reads this list: Please commit the Port. The announcement

update: net/nmap

2005-12-16 Thread Sebastian Rother
takes nmap to 3.95. notable updates: - nmap goes on a diet - completely new manpage/help screen (plus translations) - nmapfe moves from gtk1 to gtk2 full changelog in source or http://www.insecure.org/nmap/changelog.html Seems to work OK for me, i386-current as of December

Question related to mozilla-firebird in www

2005-12-14 Thread Sebastian Rother
Why is there still an entry for Mozilla-Firebird in www? godfather $ less /usr/ports/www/mozilla-fire[tab] mozilla-firebird/ mozilla-firefox/ Is that entry still needed or could it get wiped out? Firefox is the name of an OpenSource-DB so the Mozilla-Project droped this name long time ago.

Re: makeg install wont work for ports

2005-11-13 Thread Sebastian Rother
Nikolay: In the ports tree use 'env COPTS=-g make' instead. But again, it We actually prefer DEBUG=-g, that way many ports do not strip their binaries at install time. Nikolay Well thanks for the answers. So I've a change-request (or two): Please enable the possibility to build a software

nmap ftp-bounce- and zombie-scanning wont work

2005-11-12 Thread Sebastian Rother
Nmap will crash (amd64/i386, oBSD current and 3.8) if you're using the -b option. Example: nmap -P0 -sV -T5 -b [EMAIL PROTECTED] 141.20.15.92 Starting nmap 3.93 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2005-11-13 06:01 CET Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. The -sI options seams

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-06 Thread Sebastian Rother
*snip* Perl and is still buggy. So if you wanna change something then please take your time...! WHAT is buggy about it ? I haven't seen any recent bug-report. I'm not aware of issues with it. Dear Marc, 1st: Please send a mail just to me if you've an Off-topic question 2nd: The answer:

OpenBSD AMD64 current: Firefox - Coredump (possible also in 3.8)

2005-10-10 Thread sebastian . rother
Firefox seams to crash if you paste some big textblock e.g. into a web-Frontend. What did I? I tried to blame SAMSUNG because I bought a SAMSUNG ML-1610 and I can't print (I just don#t get it, if somebody had a familiar device and likes to help me: THanks...). So I tried to mail the 2nd time to

Dsniff coredump OpenBSD-Current, AMD64 (SMP)

2005-10-07 Thread sebastian . rother
Tkae ya prefered 40MB wordlist, a neat TelnetD somewhere and use Hydra to bruteforce any account. Then switch to another console and run dsniff ($ dsniff). Dsniff will coredump after some seconds. Example (dsniff ran 90-110 seconds): - 10/08/05 07:07:29 tcp some.where.int.19574 -

Porting Hydra - Help request (because I ran out of knowledge :) )

2005-10-06 Thread sebastian . rother
Hello everybody, I tried to port Hydra 5.0 to OpenBSD because in the ports there's still Version 4.6. It works as long as every SIP specific stuff gets excluded. As far as I noticed tha GTK-Patch is obsolate. Could somebody with more experience take a look at this software because I've no

[Fwd: Missing Libary and request for uptaring the Port to 5.0]

2005-09-30 Thread sebastian . rother
-- Original e-Mail was send to the Portmaintainer wich droped his portmaintainership 3 hours ago (and I got no answer). So I guess ports@ is responseable now

John-Bug ?

2005-09-28 Thread sebastian . rother
Hello everybody, I noticed something using John: 1. Get some DES-Encrypted Passwords 2. john -i --session=test DESFILE 3. john --status=test 4. john --status I noticed that the output is not the same: home/somebody $ john --status=test guesses: 0 time: 994:21:40:42 c/s: 431 /home/rembrandt

VLC - Coredump and/or Seg-Faults on AMD64

2005-09-28 Thread sebastian . rother
Hello everybody, I've just an 8MB VideoChip (ATI XL) so it realy sucks to view Videos with mplayer because it hangs (even Windows plays them fluidly). So I tried to use VCL to see if it performs better. If I wanna start vcl (it compiles frine from the ports) it coredumps (tested with KDE3) or

XFCE, 3.8, AMD64 - Hangs

2005-09-28 Thread sebastian . rother
XFCE build from Src on a OpenBSD 3.8 (-rOPENBSD_3_8) hangs sometimes on a AMD64. It totaly freeze. You've to switch to a console (ctrl-alt-f2) and kill it (or X using ctrl-c). I noticed it serval times as I just used Firefox. The same browser works well on e.g. FVWM (shiped with openBSD). Kind

GPDF - 3.8, AMD64 - X hangs until gPDF get killed from console

2005-09-28 Thread sebastian . rother
After I tried xPDF wich didn't worked I tried gPDF. I've nearly the same result. X hangs until gPDF gets killed from the console. OS: 3.8 (-rOPENBSD_3_8) ARCH: AMD64 Kind regards Sebastian -- Don't buy anything from YeongYang. Their Computercases are expensiv, they WTX-powersuplies start

thcrut Update - 0.1 up to 1.2.5

2005-07-18 Thread sebastian . rother
I tested the THCRUT-Port and noticed that it was a littlebit 'old'. During efforts in 1.2.4 years ago it runs without patches. So I modified the Makefile and the distinfo. PLease test the Port and integrate the Update into current *please*. I guess there will be no new release so it's the latest

Re: ettercap/bsd-airtools-Port - Request for removing....

2005-06-19 Thread sebastian . rother
blah blah blah blah just stop it Does your ettercap-port work? My copy of the port dosn't (i386 and amd64 (both: stable and current)...). work != compiles fine... I just noticed: Critic: The port dosn't work (well) Solution: none (or include and own tool into OpenBSD (like tcpdump,

ettercap/bsd-airtools-Port - Request for removing.... and...critic

2005-06-18 Thread sebastian . rother
To make it as short as possible... Nobody cares for the ettercap port and nobody updates it. And I noticed today again that the port builds fine but that the software WONT run on i386/amd64... Nothings changed for nearly a year... But now ettercap wont even start and isn't even useable in the